Extracellular α‐synuclein (α‐syn) assemblies can be up‐taken by neurons; however, their interaction with the plasma membrane and proteins has not been studied specifically. Here we demonstrate that α‐syn assemblies form clusters within the plasma membrane of neurons. Using a proteomic‐based approach, we identify the α3‐subunit of Na+/K+‐ATPase (NKA) as a cell surface partner of α‐syn assemblies. The interaction strength depended on the state of α‐syn, fibrils being the strongest, oligomers weak, and monomers none. Mutations within the neuron‐specific α3‐subunit are linked to rapid‐onset dystonia Parkinsonism (RDP) and alternating hemiplegia of childhood (AHC). We show that freely diffusing α3‐NKA are trapped within α‐syn clusters resulting in α3‐NKA redistribution and formation of larger nanoclusters. This creates regions within the plasma membrane with reduced local densities of α3‐NKA, thereby decreasing the efficiency of Na+ extrusion following stimulus. Thus, interactions of α3‐NKA with extracellular α‐syn assemblies reduce its pumping activity as its mutations in RDP/AHC.
See also: PJ Kahle et al (October 2015)
The α3‐Na+/K+‐ATPase (NKA) pump is uniformly distributed on the plasma membrane and maintains Na+ gradient in neurons. Exogenous α‐synuclein assemblies interact with the plasma membrane, diffuse and form clusters. The α3‐NKA pumps get trapped within these clusters altering their spatial organization and ultimately reducing the Na+ extrusion efficiency.
α‐synuclein clusters within neuronal plasma membrane.
The sodium pump α3‐Na+/K+‐ATPase is trapped within α‐synuclein clusters.
α‐synuclein reduces α3‐NKA‐dependent Na+ extrusion from neurons.
Reduced Na+ extrusion may contribute to Parkinson associated symptoms and dystonia/hemiplegia.
Observations that embryonic dopamine neurons transplanted in PD patients developed α‐syn‐positive Lewy bodies 11–16 years after surgery (Kordower et al, 2008; Li et al, 2008) have led to the notion that α‐syn assemblies released from neurons can propagate in a prion‐like manner by seeding the assembly of endogenous α‐syn (reviewed in Brettschneider et al, 2015). Several in vitro experiments (exposure to α‐syn) and animal models (injection of α‐syn) support the seeded aggregation and transmission of α‐syn (Desplats et al, 2009; Hansen et al, 2011; Volpicelli‐Daley et al, 2011; Luk et al, 2012; Mougenot et al, 2012; Rey et al, 2013; Holmqvist et al, 2014; Sacino et al, 2014; Peelaerts et al, 2015). The docking of infectious protein assemblies and binding to membrane proteins is critical for prion (Büeler et al, 1993) or amyloid beta (Aβ) oligomer (Renner et al, 2010)‐mediated neurotoxicity. However, the interaction of exogenous α‐syn with the plasma membrane and neuron‐specific membrane proteins is not well documented.
In this study, we show that exogenously applied α‐syn assemblies form clusters following lateral diffusion both in and outside synapses. In order to identify neuronal proteins that interact with exogenous α‐syn, we exposed pure neuronal cultures to oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn for 10 min, pulled down the complex, and identified the associated proteins using a proteomic‐based approach. Neuron‐specific α3‐subunit of plasma membrane‐enriched enzyme Na+/K+‐ATPase (NKA) or sodium pump (Azarias et al, 2013) was the only transmembrane protein identified to interact with both oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn. Interestingly, several mutations in the gene encoding α3‐subunit of NKA (ATP1A3) are linked to rapid‐onset dystonia Parkinsonism (RDP) (de Carvalho Aguiar et al, 2004; Rodacker et al, 2006; Clapcote et al, 2009; Kirshenbaum et al, 2011), alternating hemiplegia of childhood (AHC) (Heinzen et al, 2012; Rosewich et al, 2012) and cerebellar ataxia, areflexia, pes cavus, optic atrophy, and sensorineural hearing loss (CAPOS) syndrome (Demos et al, 2014), all of which are associated with motor dysfunction. Failure or reduction in pump activity leading to an increase in Na+ levels has been proposed to contribute to these diseases (Benarroch, 2011). In addition, reduced global expression (Ellis et al, 2003) and aggregation (Martin et al, 2007) of α3‐NKA have been observed in mouse models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
We postulate that alteration in the pumping activity of α3‐NKA upon α‐syn assemblies binding impairs the maintenance of Na+ gradient, thus disrupting neuronal function and initiating a detrimental signaling cascade. Using single particle tracking (SPT) in cultured neurons, we demonstrate that the otherwise freely diffusing α3‐NKA were trapped within α‐syn clusters and thus exhibit reduced mobility on the plasma membrane resulting from direct interaction involving the extracellular domain of α3‐NKA. Quantitative super‐resolution STORM (stochastic optical resolution microscopy) shows that α3‐NKA exists as nanoclusters and that exposure to α‐syn increases their size by recruiting additional α3‐NKA molecules. We further demonstrate that rapid Na+ extrusion from neurons, an α3‐NKA‐specific function, is reduced upon interaction with α‐syn.
α‐syn assemblies form clusters on the plasma membrane following lateral diffusion
All α‐syn assemblies used in the study were characterized as in Pieri et al (2012), Bousset et al (2013), and Peelaerts et al (2015). We monitored in particular their assembly kinetics, their shape by using electron microscopy, and their composition by mass spectrometry (Appendix Fig S1). We assessed the distribution and localization of exogenously applied oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn assemblies on cultured striatal neurons. We observed that exogenous ATTO‐550‐labeled oligomeric (25 nM) or fibrillar (0.03 nM) α‐syn form clusters on neuronal membranes (Fig 1A). The fluorescence intensities of the clusters increased with the number of days neurons were maintained in culture (DIV: days in vitro) (Fig 1A and B; Appendix Table S1). For oligomeric assemblies, clustering increased between DIV 14 and DIV 21, following neuronal maturation and an observed increase in number of synapses as reported previously (Weiss et al, 1986). α‐syn clustering was observed on axons (tau immunoreactivity, Fig 1C), dendrites (MAP2 immunoreactivity, Fig 1C), and the cell body of neurons indicating that α‐syn binds to the plasma membrane irrespective of the compartment.
The location of oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn assemblies relative to the plasma membrane was assessed after transfection with TMD‐Dendra plasmid (transmembrane domain of syntaxin protein) and two‐color PALM (Dendra)/STORM (Alexa 647) super‐resolution imaging (photoactivated localization microscopy/stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy). TMD‐Dendra translocate to the plasma membrane, thus allowing a direct visualization of the neuronal silhouette (Ribrault et al, 2011). Neurons were then exposed to oligomeric (25 nM) or fibrillar (0.03 nM) Alexa 647‐labeled α‐syn. After exposure (1 h, Fig 1D), both oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn clusters were detected along the plasma membrane. Overlay of the images showed that α‐syn assemblies formed clusters adjacent to the plasma membrane. This was confirmed using immunolabeling with α‐syn antibody on neurons pre‐exposed to α‐syn‐Alexa 647 (Appendix Fig S2).
The amount of bound α‐syn and the number of α‐syn clusters exhibited concentration dependence (Appendix Fig S3). Notably, the binding and clustering of oligomeric α‐syn was more pronounced than that of fibrillar α‐syn (Appendix Fig S3, Appendix Table S2). More importantly, the fluorescence intensity of clusters (Fig 2A) and the number of the clusters (Fig 2B) depended also on the exposure time of oligomeric (25 nM) or fibrillar (0.03 nM) α‐syn assemblies (also see Appendix Table S3). α‐syn clusters could already be detected 5 min after exposure suggesting rapid kinetics of α‐syn binding and clustering. The proportion of α‐syn clusters associated with synapses (synapsin immunoreactivity) also increased with time (Fig 2C and D). α‐syn clustering was independent of synapse type and showed no preferential accumulation at excitatory (homer) or inhibitory (gephyrin) synapses (Appendix Table S4).
The rapid binding on the plasma membrane and time‐dependent increase in the clustering suggests a mechanism compatible with the recruitment of α‐syn assemblies via lateral diffusion. To determine whether this is the case, 16–18 DIV old neurons were exposed (60 min) to biotin and ATTO550 dual‐labeled oligomeric (25 nM) α‐syn (Fig 2E). Single molecules (white trajectories, Fig 2E, left) were visualized together with α‐syn clusters (red, ATTO‐550 fluorescence, Fig 2E, left). α‐syn‐QD displayed free Brownian diffusion outside clusters and confined diffusion over clusters characterized by respective linear or bent MSD (mean square displacement) versus time plot (Fig 2E, right). This demonstrates that freely diffusing single molecules of α‐syn are trapped within self‐composed clusters on the neuronal plasma membrane.
Next, we assessed whether lateral diffusion accounts for time‐dependent synaptic clustering as observed above (Fig 2C and D). We performed SPT‐QD studies on neurons exposed to biotin‐labeled oligomeric (25 nM) or fibrillar (0.03 nM) α‐syn for 5 min or 60 min (Fig 2F and G). Cell surface‐bound biotin‐α‐syn assemblies were then tracked following their labeling with streptavidin‐QD‐605 nm (Fig 2F, trajectories: red), and the synapses were identified using FM4‐64 dye (Fig 2F, blue) labeling. Single‐molecule trajectories overlapping with FM4‐64 labeling were considered as synaptic. A global slowdown in the diffusion coefficient of α‐syn assemblies was observed between 5 and 60 min after exposure (Fig 2G). These data favor the notion that α‐syn assemblies form clusters on plasma membrane following lateral diffusion and that they experience molecular interactions within clusters.
Identification of proteins that interact with extracellularly applied oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn assemblies
A proteomic screening was performed to identify membrane proteins interacting with extracellularly applied α‐syn assemblies. Recombinant α‐syn (oligomeric and fibrillar forms) with a C‐terminal S‐tag (Appendix Fig S1) that binds with high affinity to ribonuclease S‐protein (Raines et al, 2000) were used to identify specific partners of extracellularly applied α‐syn in neurons as illustrated (Fig 3A). Pure cultures of cortical neurons were exposed to oligomeric or fibrillar S‐tagged α‐syn for 10 min. α‐syn‐S‐tag and associated proteins were pulled down from whole‐cell lysates using S‐protein agarose beads, trypsin digested, and the resulting peptides were identified by nanoLC‐MS/MS (LC: liquid chromatography; MS: mass spectrometry). Control samples were prepared from neurons unexposed to α‐syn. Protein abundance was assessed by a label‐free quantitative proteomic method using spectral counting. We identified 32 and 178 neuronal protein partners for oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn, respectively (Appendix Tables S5 and S6, column 1–4). Several intracellular proteins were identified in the screen due to the interaction following endocytosis of α‐syn (Hansen et al, 2011; Volpicelli‐Daley et al, 2011; Holmes et al, 2013) and/or interaction following cell disruption during protein extraction. Among the identified candidates, α3‐subunit of NKA was picked for further study because of the confirmatory results of a hypothesis‐driven approach: the pull‐down data indicate that α3‐NKA is the only transmembrane protein of our list with extracellularly exposed domains and was identified both with oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn. The mass spectrometry spectra of α3‐NKA peptides are shown in Appendix Fig S4. In addition to α3‐subunit of NKA, fibrillar α‐syn also pulled down the β1‐subunit of NKA (Appendix Table S6) that co‐assembles with α‐subunit to form a functional pump. Pull‐down/MS studies were also performed on pure astrocytes culture following exposure (10 min) to α‐syn assemblies (Appendix Table S7A and B). Astrocyte‐specific α2‐NKA was not identified as α‐syn interacting partner.
The interaction between α3‐NKA and α‐syn was confirmed using chemical cross‐linking/MS (Appendix Tables S5 and S6, column 5). For this, membrane proteins were cross‐linked using the cleavable cross‐linker DTSSP (3,3′‐dithiobis(sulfosuccinimidylpropionate)) in neurons exposed (10 min) to fibrillar α‐syn‐S‐tag. Proteins interacting with α‐syn‐S‐tag were pulled down, reduced, alkylated, cleaved with trypsin, and subjected to MS as described above. We performed a α3‐NKA‐specific peptide targeted identification strategy using SEQUEST search engine. This allowed us to identify nine peptides (Fig EV1A) from α3‐NKA as exemplified by the MS spectra for two of them (884–901 and 903–928, Fig EV1B and C). One of these peptides spanning α3‐NKA residues 903–928 was cross‐linked through K928 or S915 to α‐syn. Thus, cross‐link/MS (Fig EV1C) confirms the pull‐down/MS results that α3‐NKA binds α‐syn assemblies. The interaction between α‐syn and α3‐NKA was further confirmed using co‐immunoprecipitation experiments (Fig 3B). When α3‐NKA was immunoprecipitated using a specific antibody, α‐syn was found associated. Fibrillar α‐syn co‐precipitated more than oligomeric isoforms, while monomeric α‐syn was not co‐precipitated suggesting conformation specificity. This experiment mirrors α3‐NKA pull‐down with S‐tagged α‐syn and clearly demonstrates that the two proteins interact.
Trapping of α3‐NKA within α‐syn clusters
In order to probe the interaction between α‐syn assemblies and α3‐subunit containing Na+ pump, we performed live‐cell single particle tracking experiments using quantum dots (SPT‐QD) (Triller & Choquet, 2008). Indeed, SPT‐QD allows probing of transient and local protein–protein interaction in non‐invasive imaging conditions (Ribrault et al, 2011; Specht et al, 2011). First, the diffusion dynamics of α3‐NKA over (inside) or outside (outside) α‐syn clusters were analyzed using SPT‐QD. Experiments were performed on DIV 16 neurons expressing pHluorin‐α3‐NKA and following 10 min exposure to ATTO‐550‐labeled oligomeric (25 nM) or fibrillar (0.03 nM) α‐syn. pHluorin‐α3‐NKA molecules were labeled using a GFP antibody pre‐coupled to QDs (see experimental procedures). Trapping of a freely diffusing α3‐NKA single QD over fibrillar α‐syn cluster can be seen (Fig 4A; Movie EV1). The diffusion coefficients of pHluorin‐α3‐NKA over α‐syn clusters (inside, dashed lines) were slower than outside clusters (outside, solid lines) (Fig 4B; Appendix Table S8). These results suggest that free‐diffusing α3‐NKA were trapped within α‐syn clusters and evident from the downward bent of MSD plots (Fig 4C). Notably, pHluorin‐α3‐NKA molecules not diffusing over α‐syn clusters (outside, Fig 4B) exhibited slower diffusion coefficients for fibrillar (orange, solid line) than oligomeric α‐syn (blue, solid line). This suggests that freely diffusing trajectories are already bound to α‐syn and that they may be affected by the quaternary structure or the molecular weight of non‐clustered α‐syn molecules.
The synaptic and extra‐synaptic α3‐NKA diffusion parameters were affected in a time‐dependent manner (Fig 4D and E). pHluorin‐α3‐NKA‐transfected neurons were exposed to unlabeled oligomeric (25 nM) or fibrillar (0.03 nM) α‐syn for 5 or 60 min and synapses identified using FM4‐64 uptake. A global time‐dependent slowdown in diffusion coefficient of α3‐NKA was observed following exposure of neurons to oligomeric (blue) or fibrillar (orange) α‐syn as compared to control neurons (Fig 4D; Appendix Table S9). To determine the relative change in confinement, the area explored by α3‐NKA trajectories was computed within a given time period (extracted from MSD, see Materials and Methods) (Fig 4E; Appendix Table S9). A time‐dependent reduction in average synaptic and extra‐synaptic surface area explored by α3‐NKA trajectories was observed, thus confirming an increased confinement. Thus, the concomitant slowdown of α‐syn (Fig 2G) and α3‐NKA (Fig 4) suggested a diffusion‐trap mechanism resulting from their interactions. As a control of specificity, monomeric α‐syn (50 nM) exposure (60 min) led to no or very subtle changes (see Fig EV2A), suggesting that the interaction and slowdown is specific to higher‐order α‐syn assemblies. In addition, the diffusion of α3‐NKA was not modified following exposure (60 min) to amyloid‐β (Aβ) oligomers (200 nM, Fig EV2B) that form clusters on the neuronal plasma membrane (Renner et al, 2010).
Selective interaction of α3‐NKA and α‐syn assemblies
In order to identify the α3‐NKA extracellular binding site for α‐syn, we took advantage of the fact that the α3‐subunit but not the α1‐subunit of NKA was identified in our MS experiments. The α‐subunit of NKA has 10 transmembrane regions (TM1–TM10) and 5 extracellular loops of which four domains are short (Kaplan, 2002). Based on structural data, we focused on the 52 amino acid long extracellular loop between TM7 and TM8. It is ~80% homologous between α3‐ and α1‐NKA (Fig 5A, blue and red). In fact, the central part of the TM7–TM8 loop harbors eight out of 11 primary sequence mismatches between α3‐ and α1‐subunit. This region may thus contribute to α3‐NKA but not α1‐NKA interaction with α‐syn assemblies. Three chimeric α3‐/α1‐NKA (boxed region, Fig 5A), referred to as α3/α1‐NKA‐a, b, and c, were prepared by replacing α3‐specific amino acids (blue) with the corresponding α1‐specific amino acids (red) and SPT performed following exposure of cells expressing chimeric α3/α1‐NKA to fibrillar α‐syn. The three chimeric constructs had membrane expression similar to that of non‐chimeric α3‐NKA (Appendix Fig S5). As observed previously (Fig 4D), the median diffusion coefficient of wild‐type α3‐NKA was reduced by 43% (Fig 5B) upon addition of fibrillar α‐syn. Chimeric constructs α3/α1‐NKA‐a (Fig 5C) and α3/α1‐NKA‐c (Fig 5E) showed a reduction of 35 and 28% in diffusion coefficient, respectively. In contrast, no reduction of the median diffusion coefficient of α3/α1‐NKA‐b (Fig 5D) was observed in the presence of α‐syn fibrils, suggesting that the interaction between chimeric α3/α1‐NKA and fibrillar α‐syn was abolished. Thus, amino acid Leu(L)878 and Asn(N)879 in the loop between TM7 and TM8 of α3‐subunit of NKA (Fig 5A) are likely to play a key role in α3‐NKA interaction with α‐syn assemblies.
Redistribution of α3‐NKA and co‐clustering with α‐syn assemblies
The trapping of cell surface α3‐NKA within α‐syn clusters may alter their organization and localization. In order to examine this possibility, striatal neurons were exposed (5 or 60 min) to oligomeric (25 nM) or fibrillar (0.03 nM) ATTO‐550‐α‐syn and immunolabeled with α3‐NKA and synapsin antibodies (Fig 6A). α3‐NKA‐associated immunoreactivity was evenly distributed over the surface of the neurons along with more fluorescent closely spaced clusters (Fig 6A, green). Following exposure, several oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn clusters (red) were associated with α3‐NKA clusters and their proportion increased with exposure time (38 and 47% association with oligomers after 5 and 60 min exposure respectively; 32 and 52% association with fibrils after 5 and 60 min, respectively; four experiments). Quantification of the α3‐NKA fluorescence intensity revealed an increase in synaptic enrichment following exposure to α‐syn (Fig 6B; Appendix Table S10). For α3‐NKA clusters not associated with synapses, fluorescence intensity was not modified (see Appendix Table S10). The level of association between α3‐NKA and α‐syn was assessed using the intensity correlation quotient (ICQ, Li et al, 2004). Variation of this parameter between −0.5 and 0 or between 0 and +0.5 indicates the respective absence or presence of association of the fluorophores over given pixels. ICQ gives an estimate of dependent staining, and is filtering or threshold independent. Using this non‐biased quantification, α3‐NKA and α‐syn association increased with exposure time (Fig 6C). Two‐color STORM imaging was performed to visualize the co‐localization between α3‐NKA and α‐syn at high resolution (Fig 6D, see also Materials and Methods). High‐resolution images (Fig 6D, green) showed spatially distributed α3‐NKA nanoclusters of variable sizes on the plasma membrane in agreement with a previous study (Blom et al, 2012). Large‐sized nanoclusters of α3‐NKA (Fig 6D, green) were present where α‐syn aggregated (Fig 6D, red, arrows). The increased clustering and co‐localization of α3‐NKA was more prominent with fibrillar α‐syn clusters than with oligomeric α‐syn, thus being in line with results obtained with other methods (mass spectrometry and co‐immunoprecipitation, Fig 3).
The α3‐NKA clusters packaging and organization following exposure to α‐syn were studied using super‐resolution STORM (Fig 7). Neurons were exposed to α‐syn (unlabeled, oligomeric: 25 nM; fibrillar: 0.03 nM; 1 h) and were subsequently immunolabeled (Alexa 647) for α3‐NKA. STORM images allowed the detection of single events corresponding to the detection of α3‐NKA during the imaging period (Fig 7A; see Appendix Supplementary Materials and Methods). Under control condition (unexposed), clustered and non‐clustered α3‐NKA could be detected (Fig 7A). Following α‐syn exposure, the distribution of detections was more clustered (Fig 7A). The number of detection events per cluster (Fig 7B) and inter‐cluster distance (Fig 7F) was estimated using intensity‐based thresholding (see Materials and Methods). The number of detections of α3‐NKA per cluster increased when neurons were exposed to α‐syn (Fig 7B). The inter‐cluster distance (distance between centroid of two clusters) also increased (Fig 7C) indicative of a spatial reorganization resulting from the recruitment of small nanoclusters or non‐clustered α3‐NKA to larger nanoclusters, thus leading to the formation of regions with reduced α3‐NKA surface density on the plasma membrane.
Intensity‐based threshold analysis is biased toward the center of highly dense clusters, and thus, no information is obtained from sparse regions. Therefore, we performed an unbiased cluster analysis on all detections to quantify the distribution of detections in and out of nanoclusters (Ester et al, 1996). This method organizes the detections based on a density‐based clustering structure where the clustering parameter is defined by a minimal density, ρ0. Thus, objects with local density ρ0 or above are considered clustered. The plot shows the percentage of non‐clustered detections (y‐axis) versus density threshold (ρ0, x‐axis). A lower value for a given density (ρ0) threshold implies a higher packing of detections (Fig 7D). This unbiased approach confirms that α‐syn assemblies mediate a tighter packing of α3‐NKA by recruitment of additional non‐clustered molecules. Altogether, these results demonstrate that exogenous α‐syn assemblies impact the distribution of α3‐NKA, with the formation of large α3‐NKA nanoclusters.
Synaptic clustering and association with α3‐NKA following in vivo injection of fluorescent α‐syn
Prion‐like propagation of α‐syn has been studied following intra‐striatal injection of α‐syn (Luk et al, 2012; Mougenot et al, 2012; Sacino et al, 2014). It recapitulates PD pathology leading to Lewy body deposits (~30 days), dopaminergic neuron loss (~90–180 days), and impaired motor coordination (~90–180 days). The observed pathological changes are likely to be a combination of several deleterious pathways during the course of 0–180 days. Thus, this model allowed us to investigate whether injected α‐syn forms clusters on the plasma membrane and interacts with α3‐NKA in vivo at an early time point post injection as observed in vitro.
Exogenous oligomeric or fibrillar α‐syn assemblies (labeled with ATTO‐550) were injected in one striatum of 10‐week‐old rats (as previously described in Luk et al, 2012; Rey et al, 2013). Eight hours after injection, oligomeric α‐syn was widespread throughout the striatum (Fig 8A) and clusters were seen at higher magnification (Fig 8Ba‐b). α‐syn clusters were frequently associated with MAP2 (microtubule‐associated protein 2)‐positive processes thus identified as dendrites (Fig 8C, green). Homer and gephyrin immunoreactivities identified excitatory and inhibitory synapses, respectively (Fig 8Da‐b). Several α‐syn clusters were associated with these synaptic markers (Fig 8Da‐b, arrow): Nearly 50% of oligomeric α‐syn clusters were associated with homer or gephyrin immunoreactivities (median: homer positive: 31%; gephyrin positive: 16%; n = 19 randomly selected regions around site of injection) (Fig 8Dc).
We also examined the fate of injected fibrillar α‐syn in rat striatum after different time intervals (8 and 24 h). No spread could be detected after 8 h: Fibrillar α‐syn remained at the site of injection (observation). After 24 h, very few small clusters of fibrillar α‐syn were detected adjacent to the site of injection (see Fig EV3A and B). Nearly 20% of these clusters were at synapses (Fig EV3C) (median: homer positive: 12% (n = 21); gephyrin positive: 7% (n = 20)).
We then assessed α‐syn assemblies and α3‐NKA association. Following injection of oligomeric (Fig 8E) or fibrillar (Fig EV3D) α‐syn (red) in the rat striatum, α3‐NKA (green) was immunolabeled. Synapses were identified by synapsin (blue) immunoreactivities. α3‐NKA showed an uneven distribution with a diffuse labeling and several enriched spots/clusters (Fig 8Ea, green). Few oligomeric (Fig 8Eb‐c) and fibrillar (Fig EV3Db) α‐syn clusters were associated with α3‐NKA clusters; some of them localized at synapses (Fig 8Ec, arrowheads). The fluorescence intensities of α3‐NKA clusters were measured (Fig 8Ed, n = 103 randomly selected regions around the site of injection). The higher fluorescence intensity of α3‐NKA spots over synapses (n = 102) or α‐syn clusters (n = 103) suggests α3‐NKA enrichment. Notably, an even stronger enrichment of α3‐NKA was observed at synapses where α‐syn clustered (n = 53). Thus, α‐syn injected in the striatum forms clusters where α3‐NKA molecules are enriched as observed in the in vitro experiments.
α‐syn assemblies reduce α3‐NKA‐dependent Na+ efflux from neurons and increase glutamate‐induced Ca2+ influx
α3‐NKA subunit is responsible for the restoration of Na+ level in neurons after depolarization, while α1‐NKA subunit maintains basal Na+ level (Azarias et al, 2013). Thus, the recovery rate of Na+ concentration following depolarization provides a specific quantification of α3‐NKA subunit activity (Azarias et al, 2013). The basal Na+ level, which can be estimated using a calibration plot, allows the quantification of the α1‐NKA subunit activity (Azarias et al, 2013). Neurons (DIV 16–20) were exposed or not (control) to α‐syn assemblies (oligomer: 25 nM; fibril: 0.03 nM) and loaded with Na+ dye, ANG‐2 (Asante NaTRIUM Green 2) (see Materials and Methods and Appendix Fig S6 for experimental design and calibrations). The basal level was monitored for 2–3 min; then, 0 mM K+ recording solution (~10 ml) was added to mimic transient increase in Na+ reached during supra‐threshold neuronal activity (Fig 9A, red arrow). Subsequently, the 0 mM K+ recording solution was replaced with normal recording solution, thus allowing the visualization of Na+ efflux (Fig 9A, green arrow). A representative control trace is shown in black. Calibration plot (Appendix Fig S6) was used to estimate the basal Na+ concentration in dendrites. α‐syn assemblies did not modify the basal level of Na+ after 1 h exposure (~20 mM Na+) suggesting no alteration in the overall α1‐NKA activity. However, after 24 h of exposure, a higher basal Na+ level was observed (~30 mM) suggesting large‐scale perturbation in Na+ gradient. Following the 0 mM K+ recording solution depolarization, the Na+ concentration failed to recover to the basal level (Fig 9A, black dashed lines) in neurons exposed 1 or 24 h to α‐syn assemblies. A larger Na+ influx was observed after 24‐h exposure to α‐syn assemblies (Fig 9B). Exposure to α‐syn (fibrils or oligomers) reduced the recovery of Na+ to basal level (Fig 9C) suggesting a decrease in α3‐NKA activity. α3‐NKA is responsible for the clearance of Na+ from neurons following depolarization (Azarias et al, 2013). In the presence of α‐syn assemblies, we observed a decreased rate of the Na+ extrusion (Fig 9D, see Materials and Methods), indicating a reduction of the α3‐NKA‐dependent Na+ efflux. Notably, monomeric α‐syn had no effect on recovery of Na+ to basal level (Fig EV4A) or rate of Na+ extrusion (Fig EV4B).
We next performed experiments in the presence of ouabain to (i) quantify the extent of α3‐NKA inhibition by α‐syn and (ii) ascertain whether the reduced recovery of Na+ level from neurons in the presence of α‐syn is due to α3‐NKA and not other Na+ transporters. Nearly 3–5 min before depolarization, ouabain (1 μM) was added to completely inhibit α3‐NKA (Azarias et al, 2013). As above, oligomeric α‐syn (column 2) exposed (1 h) cells showed a reduction in recovery to basal level (53%, Fig EV4C) and pumping rate (47%, Fig EV4D) compared to control cells. Ouabain‐treated cells (column 3) also showed a reduction in recovery to basal level (81%, Fig EV4C) and pumping rate (57%, Fig EV4D). These data show that α‐syn partially suppresses α3‐NKA‐dependent Na+ efflux from neurons (recovery, 60%; pumping rate, 21%). No additive effect of ouabain was observed in neurons that were pre‐exposed to oligomeric α‐syn (column 4) compared to control neurons (column 3) (Fig EV4C and D). This favors the notion that the reduction in the recovery of Na+ level in neurons following α‐syn exposure is due to α3‐NKA and not other Na+ transporters.
The activity of neuronal NKA may also have an effect on the Ca2+ response to glutamate release, because of its interaction with the NMDA receptor (Akkuratov et al, 2014) and/or the Na+/Ca2+ exchangers (Blaustein & Lederer, 1999). We observed a significantly larger Ca2+ influx in α‐syn assembly‐exposed neurons compared to unexposed neurons (Fig EV5A and B). Thus, α‐syn clustering and α3‐NKA redistribution do not only compromise Na+ gradient in neurons, but may also make them more vulnerable to glutamate excitotoxicity.
We demonstrate that both oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn assemblies rapidly bind to the plasma membrane, laterally diffuse, and form clusters at synaptic as well as extra‐synaptic locations. Using pull‐down and MS on pure neuronal cultures, we identified α‐syn interacting membrane proteins with extracellular domains. Among them, only the α3‐subunit of NKA which is enriched in the plasma membrane directly interacts with both oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn assemblies and thus further studied here. The β1‐subunit, which forms α3β1‐NKA complex, was also identified in our fibrillar α‐syn pull‐down MS proteomic screen. In addition, several heparan sulfate proteoglycans, namely agrin, glypican, and testican, were present in the interactome of fibrillar α‐syn assemblies. They may assist in the endocytosis of exogenous α‐syn molecules as recently proposed (Holmes et al, 2013). A second transmembrane protein, neurexin (1α and 2α), involved in autism spectrum disorders (Etherton et al, 2009) was also pulled down as a fibrillar α‐syn partner and needs further evaluation.
Clustering of α‐syn assemblies within neuronal plasma membrane
The rapid binding of exogenous α‐syn assemblies to neuronal membranes is consistent with what was described for Aβ oligomers (Renner et al, 2010) and prion proteins (Goold et al, 2011). Following binding and lateral diffusion on the neuronal plasma membranes, α‐syn assemblies formed clusters in a time‐ and concentration‐dependent manner. The fast diffusion (10−1 μm2/s) of oligomeric α‐syn suggests that α‐syn may be lipid‐bound (Renner et al, 2009). The link between the size of α‐syn clusters and the days the neurons were cultured is likely due to maturation‐dependent changes in neuronal plasma membrane proteins and lipids composition. Unlike Aβ oligomers, which are primarily enriched at excitatory synapse (Renner et al, 2010), α‐syn molecules clustered both at excitatory and inhibitory synapses and may also form clusters on the extra‐synaptic membrane including axonal and dendritic membrane. Since α‐syn diffusion was not significantly different in and out of synapse, it favors the notion that α‐syn confinement and clustering is not dependent on the compartment where it occurs. The fast time dependence of cluster formation supports the notion that the plasma membrane serves as a biochemical reactor favoring α‐syn inter‐molecular interactions by reducing the diffusion space from 3D to 2D by increasing the confinement of the molecules.
Interaction between α3‐NKA and α‐syn assemblies
We show that α‐syn clustering within the membrane leads to the redistribution of α3‐NKA by diffusional trapping with a reduction of its ability to pump out Na+ from neurons, thus leading to an accumulation of Na+. The strength of the interaction between α3‐NKA and α‐syn likely depends on the type of assembly of α‐syn rather than number of monomeric equivalents. This observation comes from the fact that fibrils exhibit much stronger association with α3‐NKA (MS, co‐immunoprecipitation, co‐localization and SPT studies) as compared to their oligomeric counterparts. α‐syn monomers did not interact with α3‐NKA as indicated by co‐immunoprecipitation, SPT, and Na+ imaging experiments.
Neurons express α1‐ and α3‐subunit of NKA, α1‐subunit is responsible for the maintenance of basal Na+ level and α3‐subunit is involved in rapid Na+ extrusion after supra‐threshold stimulus (Azarias et al, 2013). The basal Na+ level is unaltered after exposure of neurons to α‐syn assemblies for 1 h, indicating that α1‐NKA activity is unaffected within this time frame. The specificity of α‐syn assemblies and α3‐NKA interaction is further confirmed by the fact that only the α3, not the α1‐ or astrocyte‐specific α2‐subunit of NKA, was identified as partner of α‐syn assemblies. This observation is important since several of the mutations within the α3‐subunit of NKA, that lead to motor and cognitive disabilities, such as RDP and AHC, are associated with a reduction of Na+ affinity (Toustrup‐Jensen et al, 2014). Alterations in Na+ affinity following α3‐NKA interaction with α‐syn should have profound effects on recovery after high neuronal activity, membrane potential, and hyperpolarization (Pulver & Griffith, 2010).
We found that α‐syn led to α3‐NKA redistribution and ultimately to α‐syn‐α3‐NKA co‐clustering in and outside synapses. Using super‐resolution STED (simulated emission depletion) microscopy, it was recently shown that α3‐NKA exist as nanoclusters on neuronal dendrites and spines (Blom et al, 2012). Reorganization and redistribution of α3‐NKA bound to α‐syn assemblies resulted in the formation of larger clusters by recruitment of non‐clustered α3‐NKA molecules. Trapping within α‐syn clusters generates a non‐uniform gradient with high and low density of α3‐NKA molecules. This spatial redistribution of α3‐NKA may contribute to the reduction in the capacity of neurons to rapidly pump out Na+ following supra‐threshold stimulus. In addition, the binding of α‐syn to the extracellular loop of α3‐NKA may interfere with its turnover and transition between E1 and E2 forms, thus reducing pumping activity.
Restoration of intracellular Na+ concentration after high neuronal activity is an essential function for the α3‐NKA, and recent studies have indicated a two‐way interaction between NKA and the NMDA receptor (Akkuratov et al, 2014). Here we found that the Ca2+ response to glutamate was enhanced in α‐syn assembly‐exposed neurons, suggesting that the α‐syn pathology may also result in an increased excitotoxicity. The mechanisms behind the increased calcium response remain to be elucidated, but might be explained by a change in the state of Src‐mediated NMDA receptor phosphorylation. Src kinase is a hub for NMDA receptors signaling (Salter & Kalia, 2004), and NKA is a regulator of Src activity (Li & Xie, 2009). The reduced capacity of neurons to restore Na+ level in the α‐syn‐exposed neurons might also contribute to the enhanced Ca2+ response, since it would decrease and maybe revert the transport via the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (Kiedrowski et al, 2004), the high capacity system for Ca2+ efflux.
Postsynaptic NKA also regulates NF‐κB/CREB signaling (Desfrere et al, 2009; De Sá Lima et al, 2013) and AMPA receptor turnover (Zhang et al, 2009). In addition, α3‐NKA is also enriched at presynaptic terminals where it controls the probability and precision of firing following post‐tetanic hyperpolarization (Kim et al, 2007) as well as the availability of readily releasable pool of vesicles (Taruno et al, 2012). α3‐NKA also putatively interacts with the glycine transporter (GlyT2) regulating the surface expression of the latter (De Juan‐Sanz et al, 2013). Thus, an alteration in α3‐NKA distribution and pumping activity will not only affect the ionic gradient in neurons, but also a plethora of other pre‐ and postsynaptic pathways in neurons. This is supported by our observation that α‐syn binds and clusters on both axons and dendrites and also synaptic and extra‐synaptic sites. Due to ubiquitous expression of α3‐NKA on the plasma membrane, α‐syn‐α3‐NKA co‐clustering will not only alter local ion gradient but also NKA‐dependent signaling pathways. Given that α3‐NKA is more enriched at synapses (Figs 6B and 8Ed), the effect will be important on synaptic ion concentration.
The most documented pathophysiological consequence of reduced/loss of NKA activity comes from studies on dystonia disease models resulting in hyperactivity, memory, and motor deficits (Clapcote et al, 2009; Kirshenbaum et al, 2011). Moreover, perfusion of ouabain, inhibiting α3‐NKA, in the striatum leads to Parkinson‐like dystonia (Calderon et al, 2011). Similarly, the interaction of α‐syn assemblies with α3‐NKA interfering with Na+ pumping out of neurons may contribute to α‐synucleinopathies such as Parkinson's disease.
Materials and Methods
An elaborated version of Materials and Methods is provided in the Appendix section.
Preparation and characterization of α‐syn assemblies
Preparation and characterization of recombinant wild‐type (WT) and C‐terminally S‐tagged (α‐syn‐S‐tag) human α‐syn is described in Appendix Supplementary Materials and Methods. For our preparation, the average number of constituting molecules measured for oligomeric and fibrillar α‐syn was 40 and 8,333, respectively. The concentration of oligomeric α‐syn was 25 nM and that of fibrillar α‐syn was 0.03 nM, unless otherwise specified, corresponding to 1 or 0.25 μM monomeric α‐syn, respectively.
Exposure to α‐syn, single particle tracking, and analysis
For SPT of α‐syn assemblies, biotin‐labeled α‐syn was used and identified by streptavidin‐QD‐605 nm. Following exposure to α‐syn assemblies, cells were incubated with streptavidin‐QD‐605 nm (1:5,000, 2 min). For SPT of α3‐NKA, cells transfected with pHluorin‐α3‐NKA plasmid were labeled using GFP antibody pre‐coupled with QD‐Fab‐605 nm (Invitrogen). The center of the QD fluorescence spot was determined by Gaussian fitting, and maximum‐likelihood approach was used to obtain trajectories. The mean square displacement (MSD) was calculated using MSD(ndt) = , where xi and yi are the coordinates of an object on frame I, N is the total number of steps in the trajectory, dt is the time between two successive frames, and ndt is the time interval over which displacement is averaged (Saxton & Jacobson, 1997). The diffusion coefficient D was calculated by fitting the first two to five points of the MSD plot versus time with the equation , with σx is the spot localization accuracy in one direction.
Pull‐down of α‐syn‐S‐tag‐bound protein complexes and mass spectrometry (MS)
A detailed protocol is described in Appendix Supplementary Materials and Methods. Rat pure cortical neuron cultures were exposed (10 min) to α‐syn‐S‐tag assemblies (40 μM monomer concentration). Unexposed neurons were used as control. Purified protein extracts were subjected to MS by nanoLC‐MS/MS. Only proteins identified with at least two unique peptides in at least two replicates were quantified. Only proteins with a spectral count ratio, between the cells exposed to α‐syn (either oligomeric or fibrillar) and the control cells, above 1.6 and a P‐value < 0.05 were considered as significantly increased in the pull‐down and thus considered as α‐syn interacting proteins.
Proteomics data deposition
The mass spectrometry proteomics data (neurons and astrocytes) have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (Vizcaíno et al, 2014) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifiers PXD002256 through PXD002263 and DOI 10.6019/PXD002256 through 10.6019/PXD002263.
Sodium dye loading, imaging and analysis
Sodium imaging was performed following loading of neurons with Na+‐sensitive cytosolic ANG2 (Asante NaTRIUM Green 2) dye. The fluorescence intensity (F) of ANG2 on dendrites was normalized to the fluorescence levels of the calibration solutions containing 10 mM Na+ (F10 mM). The increase in fluorescence from basal level, the recovery to basal level after depolarization, and Na+ extrusion rate were measured as depicted in Appendix Fig S6.
ANS, AT, RM, and AA designed the research. ANS, VR, NF, and LP performed experiments. LB generated α‐syn assemblies and characterized them. TL generated pHluorin‐α3‐NKA plasmid and optimized sodium imaging approach. MS and CL performed in vivo injections. LGA and MR developed new tools for image analysis. ANS, AT and RM wrote the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Expanded View Figures PDF
We thank Karine Madiona for expert assistance with the analytical ultracentrifugation measurements. This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐09‐MNPS‐013‐01 and ANR‐11‐BSV8‐021‐01), the ERC advanced research grant “PlasltInhib,” program “Investissements d'Avenir” (ANR‐10‐LABX‐54 MEMO LIFE and ANR‐11‐IDEX‐0001‐02 PSL* Research University), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France Alzheimer (Project R12035JJ), “Coup d'Elan a la Recherche Francaise” award from Fondation Bettencourt Schueller and Swedish Research Council. We thank Prof. Stuart J. Edelstein for carefully reading the manuscript. R.M. dedicates this work to late Prof. Paul Cohen.
FundingAgence Nationale de la RechercheANR‐09‐MNPS‐013‐01ANR‐11‐BSV8‐021‐01
- © 2015 The Authors