We stated in several places in our article that our work is the first to describe glycylation in primary cilia. We realized that this is not entirely correct since a previous publication reported on the use of the glycylation‐specific antibody TAP952 to recognize primary cilia (Davenport et al, 2007). This had unfortunately escaped our attention, presumably due to the fact that there is no comment on glycylated primary cilia in the article text; TAP952 is only referred to as ‘ciliary marker’ in the figure. We apologize for this oversight and any inconvenience caused.
- © 2014 The Authors