Dimerisation‐dependent GTPase reaction of MnmE: how potassium acts as GTPase‐activating element

Andrea Scrima, Alfred Wittinghofer

Author Affiliations

  1. Andrea Scrima and
  2. Alfred Wittinghofer*,1
  1. 1 Max‐Planck‐Institut für Molekulare Physiologie, Dortmund, Germany
  1. *Corresponding author. Department of Structural Biology, Max‐Plank‐Institut Für Molekulare Physologie, Otto‐Hahn‐Strasse 11, Dortmund 44227, Germany. Tel.: +49 231 133 2100; Fax: +49 231 133 2199; E-mail: alfred.wittinghofer{at}
View Full Text


MnmE, a Guanine nucleotide‐binding protein conserved between bacteria and man, is involved in the modification of tRNAs. Here we provide biochemical and X‐ray structural evidence for a new GTP‐hydrolysis mechanism, where the G‐domains of MnmE dimerise in a potassium‐dependent manner and induce GTP hydrolysis. The structure in the presence of GDP‐AlFx and potassium shows how juxtaposition of the subunits induces a conformational change around the nucleotide which reorients the catalytic machinery. A critical glutamate is positioned such as to stabilise or activate the attacking water. Potassium provides a positive charge into the catalytic site in a position analogous to the arginine finger in the Ras‐RasGAP system. Mutational studies show that potassium‐dependent dimerisation and GTP hydrolysis can be uncoupled and that interaction between the G‐domains is a prerequisite for subsequent phosphoryl transfer. We propose a model for the juxtaposition of G‐domains in the full‐length protein and how it induces conformational changes in the putative tRNA‐modification centre.


MnmE (formerly TrmE) is a Guanine nucleotide‐binding protein (GNBP) that is conserved in all three kingdoms of life. Unlike Ras‐like proteins, which cycle between a GDP bound inactive and a GTP bound active state, in which they interact with effector proteins (Vetter and Wittinghofer, 2001), MnmE is apparently directly involved in an enzymatic reaction, the modification of the wobble uridine (U34) in tRNAs in bacteria, yeast and mammalia (i.e. tRNALys, tRNAGlu, tRNA4Leu, tRNA4Arg and probably tRNAGln). The modification to the hypermodified U34 involves several proteins performing different steps of the reaction. MnmE together with the protein MnmG, formerly GidA (Elseviers et al, 1984; Brégeon et al, 2001), catalyses the formation of the carboxymethylaminomethyl group at the 5 position (cmnm5U), although the precise role of either protein in the reaction is unknown. Final modification to 5‐methylaminomethyl‐uridine in bacteria, 5‐carboxymethylaminomethyl‐uridine in yeast and 5‐taurinomethyl‐uridine in human allows interaction with G and A, but restricts base‐pairing with C and U (Yokoyama et al, 1979; Yokoyama et al, 1985; Yokoyama and Nishimura, 1995), thereby avoiding misincorporation of amino acids in mixed codon box families (Lys, Glu, Leu, Arg and Gln). Furthermore, the hypermodified U34 influences frame shifting during the translation process (Brierley et al, 1997; Hagervall et al, 1998; Bjork et al, 1999; Urbonavicius et al, 2001).

Mutant alleles of the MnmG and MnmE homologues Mto1 and MSS1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveal a respiratory‐deficient phenotype (Decoster et al, 1993; Colby et al, 1998). Recent studies on GTPBP3 and Mto1, the human homologues of MnmE and MnmG, lead to the suggestion that those proteins may also be involved in several human diseases like the nonsyndromic‐deafness or different clinical forms of myofibrillar myopathy (MERRF: myoclonic epilepsy; ragged red fibres/MELAS: mitochondrial encephalomyopathy; lactic acidosis; stroke), which are based on mutations in mitochondrial tRNA genes (Suzuki et al, 2001; Li and Guan, 2002; Li et al, 2002).

Several mechanisms for the stimulation of the intrinsically slow GTPase reaction of GNBPs have so far been discovered. Ras proteins interact with a GAP specific for each subfamily. RasGAPs and RhoGAPs stimulate hydrolysis by supplying a catalytic residue, an ‘arginine finger’, into the active site. This stabilises the endogenous glutamine residue which in turn stabilises the water molecule for the in‐line attack while the arginine neutralises negative charge of β‐ and γ‐phosphate oxygens in the transition state, and a similar mechanism is likely to hold for RabGAPs also. RanGAPs act by merely stabilising the catalytic machinery of Ran without using an arginine, similar to RGS proteins (regulator of G protein signalling) which stabilise the crucial endogenous Gln and Arg residues in the catalytically relevant conformation of Gα‐proteins (Vetter and Wittinghofer, 2001; Seewald et al, 2002; Rehmann and Bos, 2004). Rap proteins do not have a glutamine residue corresponding to Gln61, and Rap1GAP provides an essential Asn residue, called ‘asparagine thumb’ in analogy to the ‘arginine finger’ to accelerate hydrolysis, presumably by stabilising the nucleophilic water (Daumke et al, 2004).

Stimulation of the GTPase reaction can also be achieved by dimer (or higher oligomer) formation. The large GTP‐binding proteins dynamin and human guanylate‐binding protein 1 (hGBP1) show a concentration‐dependent hydrolysis reaction (Praefcke and McMahon, 2004). In hGBP1, a cis‐Arg is relocated into the active site by dimerisation (Ghosh et al, 2006). The bacterial homologues of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the signal recognition particle receptor (SR) form a heterodimeric complex by which they stimulate each others GTPase reaction. Structural analysis has shown that this is achieved by complementing each others active site, especially a mutual hydrogen bond between the ribose of one with the γ‐phosphate of the other partner (Focia et al, 2004; Egea et al, 2004). GTPase stimulation by dimerisation is also known for the chloroplast translocon factor Toc34 (Sun et al, 2002).

Previously we showed that MnmE is a three‐domain protein (Scrima et al, 2005). The N‐terminal α/β‐domain (1–118) induces dimerisation and binding of 5‐formyl‐tetrahydrofolate (5‐formyl‐THF). The central helical domain, which is only poorly conserved except for the C‐terminal motif C(I/L/V)GK, forms a four‐helix bundle. As shown by Yim et al (2003), Cys447 (Cys451 in MnmE from Escherichia coli) in this motif is essential for the tRNA modification activity of MnmE. The G‐domain of MnmE (211–380) is inserted into the two halves of the central helical subdomain. It conserves the canonical Ras‐like fold, with no insertion or deletion of secondary structural elements. In the structure, the G‐domain is only loosely connected to the residual domains of MnmE, which may explain why the G‐domain alone can be expressed and exhibits a GTPase activity similar to that of the full‐length protein (Cabedo et al, 1999). The G‐domain contains all canonical sequence elements, GxxxxGKS/T or P‐loop (Saraste et al, 1990), T, DxxG, NKxD and SAK (Bourne et al, 1990, 1991) and exhibits a comparatively high hydrolysis rate, although it carries a hydrophobic residue at the position of the catalytic Q61 present in Ras. Previously, Yamanaka et al (2000) have shown that the hydrolysis reaction by MnmE from Thermotoga maritima is stimulated by potassium ions, although the mechanistic basis of this effect is unknown. We thus analysed the role of the G‐domain and potassium in the function of MnmE.


Potassium accelerates the GTPase by binding to the G‐domain of MnmE

The GTPase reaction rate of full‐length MnmE from E. coli (MnmE from now) is strongly accelerated in the presence of potassium ions, whereas sodium ions have no effect (Figure 1A), as shown previously for the T. maritima protein (Yamanaka et al, 2000). To analyse this selectivity for the cation in more detail and to confine the region in MnmE that is responsible for this selectivity, we used a deletion mutant of MnmE lacking the N‐terminal dimerisation domain (ΔN‐MnmE) and a construct encompassing the isolated G‐domain of MnmE.

Figure 1.

Biochemical characterisation of potassium effects. (A) GTPase activity of full‐length (M1‐K454), ΔN‐MnmE (G102–K454) and the isolated G‐domain (G216–G384) determined under multiturnover conditions in the presence of 100 mM NaCl or KCl, 1 μM protein, 200 μM GTP and analysing samples by HPLC. (B) Multiturnover analysis of the hydrolysis activity of the G‐domain as in (A), in the presence of the indicated salts. (C) Stopped‐flow analysis of mGDP‐AlFx binding to full‐length MnmE in the presence of different salts. Preformed mGDP–protein complex (10 μM mGDP/60 μM MnmE) was mixed with 5 mM AlFx. The mant‐group was excited at 360 nm and fluorescence change was monitored through a 408 nm cutoff filter. (D) Gel filtration analysis of the multimerisation behavior of ΔN‐MnmE and the G‐domain. The protein (270 μM G‐domain or 120 μM ΔN‐MnmE) was incubated with 200 μM GDP±1 mM AlFx and with 100 mM Na+ or K+ as indicated. Apparent molecular masses corresponding to elution volumes are indicated.

The deletion mutant ΔN‐MnmE (residues G102 to K454) elutes in gel filtration experiments as a monomer due to the lack of the N‐terminal dimerisation domain, whereas full‐length MnmE elutes as a dimer (Scrima et al, 2005). This N‐terminally truncated protein retained the fast, potassium ion‐dependent reaction (Figure 1A), indicating that the N‐terminal dimerisation domain of MnmE is not involved in the selectivity for potassium. Supporting earlier observations, the G‐domain alone (residues G216 to G384) can be stably expressed. It also shows a fast, KCl‐dependent GTPase reaction (Figure 1A), indicating that the binding site for potassium is located in the G‐domain of MnmE.

To narrow down the requirement for GTPase stimulation, we analysed the effect of the alkali metals rubidium and caesium on the hydrolysis activity of the isolated G‐domain. While Rb+ has a similar activating effect as K+, Cs+ only showed a slight activation over control or the reaction in the presence of sodium (Figure 1B).

Potassium does not affect nucleotide binding

Considering the strong effect of potassium and as the GTPase reaction has an almost millimolar Km for GTP as compared to a micromolar affinity (KD), we asked whether potassium modulates the affinity towards guanine nucleotides. We analysed the effect of the cation on nucleotide binding by using fluorescent mant‐nucleotides as described previously (Scrima et al, 2005). MnmE binds GDP with affinities of 570 nM in Na+‐ and 620 nM in K+‐containing buffer. Binding affinity towards the GTP‐analogue GppNHp is 5.82 and 5.83 μM in Na+ and K+ buffer, respectively. The N‐terminally truncated construct and the G‐domain bind the di‐ and triphosphate with an affinity in the range of 1–2 μM. The results of the equilibrium titration are summarised in Table I. Again, no significant difference can be detected in binding affinity in the presence or absence of potassium, independent of the length of the construct.

View this table:
Table 1. Affinities of MnmE constructs to mGDP/mGppNHp in presence of Na+ or K+

AlFx binding is dependent on potassium ions

Aluminum fluoride binds to the γ‐phosphate‐binding site of hydrolysis competent ATP‐ and GTP‐hydrolysing proteins (Wittinghofer, 1997). For the small GTP‐binding proteins of the Ras superfamily, AlFx binding is only realised in the presence of their respective GAPs. Structural analysis of Ras, RhoA and heterotrimeric Gα‐proteins has shown that AlFx binding mimics the transition state of phosphoryl transfer, and that in these cases an ‘arginine finger’, supplied in trans by GAP and in cis by Gα‐proteins, stabilises the transition state by neutralising the negative charges of the β‐ and γ‐phosphate oxygen groups (Vetter and Wittinghofer, 2001).

To show whether acceleration of MnmE‐mediated GTPase is also due to stabilisation of the transition state by potassium, interaction of an MnmE·mGDP complex with aluminium fluoride was monitored by stopped‐flow. We observe a 37% fluorescence increase (Figure 1C) in the presence of KCl, but not NaCl (3%). The fluorescence signal reaches a plateau after approximately 500 s leading to the conclusion that a stable complex of MnmE, K+ and mGDP‐AlFx is formed. An increase of fluorescence by 24% is detectable in the presence of Rb+ and by 9% with Cs+. These results fairly well match with the hydrolysis data and show that the catalytic activity correlates with the signal intensity detected in the AlFx‐binding assay.

As the G‐domain of MnmE is sufficient for potassium‐dependent GTP hydrolysis, we tested both the ΔN‐MnmE and the G‐domain constructs for AlFx binding in the presence of potassium. Both the truncated construct and the isolated G‐domain showed an increase in fluorescence as well (see Figure 5A for ΔN‐MnmE and Supplementary Figure 1 for G‐domain) in line with the conclusion that the G‐domain is required and sufficient for stabilisation of the transition state by potassium.

AlFx induces dimerisation of the G‐domain

In the X‐ray structure of the MnmE dimer model (Scrima et al, 2005), the nucleotide‐binding sites of the G‐domains face each other, but are not in close proximity. The magnitude of the fluorescence change of mGDP after AlFx addition suggested a major conformational change such as a close juxtaposition of the G‐domains. We thus measured the nucleotide‐dependent oligomerisation state of the latter in presence of various ions. As MnmE is stably dimerised due to the N‐terminal domain, it shows no significant shift in the elution profile when using GDP or GDP+AlFx in NaCl and KCl‐containing buffers (not shown). Furthermore, when using NaCl, ΔN‐MnmE elutes as a monomer with an apparent molecular mass of 69 kDa in the presence of GDP or GDP‐AlFx (Figure 1D). With KCl, however, ΔN‐MnmE forms a dimer (115 kDa apparent molecular mass) in the presence of GDP‐AlFx (Figure 1D), but not with GDP alone. This property is retained for the isolated G‐domain, demonstrating that the G‐domains form a stable, potassium‐dependent dimer (38 kDa) in the presence of GDP‐AlFx, but not GDP (24 kDa). We additionally analysed the dimerisation behaviour for the isolated G‐domain in the presence of potassium using the triphosphate analogue GTPγS (see Supplementary Figure 2). These studies suggest that GTP‐ and potassium‐dependent dimerisation is required for efficient GTP hydrolysis. As GTP and GTPγS (rate constant: 0.42/min) are hydrolysed during gel filtration, we used a mutant E282A that shows a strongly reduced hydrolysis activity (see below). As expected, GTP but not GDP induces dimerisation of ΔN‐MnmE in the presence of potassium (Supplementary Figure 3). Summarising, GTP as well as the transition state mimic GDP‐AlFx induce a potassium‐dependent dimerisation via the G‐domain of MnmE.

X‐ray structure of the G‐domain dimer

To get structural insights into the mechanism by which oligomerisation and catalysis of MnmE are mediated by potassium, we crystallised the G‐domain of MnmE of E. coli in the presence of potassium, GDP and AlFx. As, surprisingly, molecular replacement using the G‐domain of the apo‐structure of full‐length MnmE did not allow phasing, phase determination was performed by single‐wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) after incorporation of seleno‐methionine. A resolution of 1.7 Å obtained with those crystals in combination with the phase information allowed model building (Table II).

View this table:
Table 2. Data collection, phasing and refinement statistics

The asymmetric unit of the crystals contains four molecules organised as two identical homodimers (Figure 2A) with GDP, aluminium fluoride and potassium in the nucleotide‐binding site. G‐proteins contain two regions called switch I and II that sense the nucleotide state of the protein by forming two invariant main chain hydrogen bonds to the γ‐phosphate. As expected, the switch regions of MnmE, which were highly flexible in the apo‐form, are now fixed and restructured (Figure 2B). The protein shows a seven‐stranded β‐sheet with four α‐helices, as compared to the canonical six β‐strands and five α‐helices in the apo‐form. This is due to a remarkable conformational change whereby helix Gα4 is converted into a β‐strand (Gβcon). Owing to the rearrangement of switch II, there is a large change in Gβ2/3 and an even larger one in Gα2, which is elongated by two additional turns and tilted by approximately 33 degree compared to the apo‐form (Figure 2B). The large conformational changes thus provide an explanation for the inability to solve the structure by molecular replacement.

Figure 2.

MnmE G‐domain dimer structure. (A) Ribbon presentation of the MnmE G‐domain dimer (G216–G384), with molecules A and B in green and cyan, respectively, with switch I and II (yellow), P‐loop (red) and K‐loop (purple) highlighted, and GDP, AlF4, Mg2+ and K+ as ball‐and‐stick models. (B) Stereo view of the superimposition of the nucleotide‐free and GDP‐AlFx‐bound structures of the G‐domain, highlighting potassium‐induced conformational changes in helix Gα2, the switches and Gα4 (purple), which is converted into a β‐strand Gβcon (blue).

The dimer interface

The buried interface (probe radius 1.5 Å) of 1790 Å2 is composed of three highly conserved patches of polar and hydrophobic contacts (Figure 3A) formed by switch I and II. Residues from the first (E240, A241, I243, T245) and second patch (T250 to R256) from switch I are involved in several main‐chain/main‐chain and main‐chain/side‐chain interactions with patch II, and mostly hydrophobic interactions with patch III residues (V281, I284, R288) from switch II in the second molecule. Most of the interactions are mediated by patch II including the 249GTTRD253 motif conserved in all MnmE homologues (Figure 3B). Of these, T251, R252 and D253 have a large number of polar interactions with the symmetry‐related patch II. D253 contacts four counter‐residues (A241 and I243 directly, R252 and D253 via a bridging water) via its side chain and D253 via the main chain. L255 make symmetric hydrophobic contacts with each other and additionally position the important D253. G249 is not involved in contacting the second molecule, but appears essential for the conformation of the loop as its torsion angles are unfavoured for non‐glycine residues. Residues of the third patch (V281, I284) contribute to the interface via hydrophobic interaction and R288 by a main‐chain interaction (Figure 3A).

Figure 3.

The dimer interface. (A) Schematic representation of the three interaction patches in the dimer interface. Polar interactions are indicated by a red line, hydrophobic interactions by a green line. Water molecules involved in the polar interactions are shown as red dots. The labels N and O indicate main‐chain interactions. (B) Secondary structure assignment as deduced from the GDP‐AlFx structure and sequence conservation of the MnmE G‐domain, with degree of conservation as indicated by the coloured bar. Sequence conservation has been calculated with ConSeq (Berezin et al, 2004) based on 50 sequences. The flexible region at the C‐terminus with weak electron density is depicted as a dashed line.

Nucleotide binding and active site

The active site contains GDP and aluminium fluoride, which from the electron density we identify as AlF4. The nucleotide is bound in a way typical for G‐proteins (summarised in Figure 4A). The base is contacted by the NKxD motif of which N335 contacts the N7 position of the base, the specificity residue D338 forms a double hydrogen bond with the N1 hydrogen and 2‐amino‐group of the guanine base. The base is further stabilised by K336 on one and R360 of the SAR motif on the other side. S358 contacts the 6‐oxygen of the base and additionally positions the D338 side chain. The hydrogen bond between the main chain NH of A359 and the O6‐oxygen is the second major specificity determinant that excludes adenine binding.

Figure 4.

Nucleotide binding and catalysis. (A) Schematic representation of the binding site of GDP‐AlF4 and potassium. (B) The catalytic centre as viewed from the in‐line attacking water towards AlF4. The K‐loop together with the phosphates, the AlF4 and Asn226 coordinates the potassium ion and shields it from the surrounding solvent. The three positive charges of the P‐loop Lys229, Mg2+ and K+ form a triangle around what represents the β–γ‐bridging oxygen of GTP. (C) Structural analysis with RbCl. The anomalous density (contoured at 2σ) of the Rb+ position is shown in red, the 2FOFC map surrounding the GDP‐AlFx and Mg2+ (contoured at 2σ) in green. (D) Superimposition of the Ras‐RasGAP (Ras: blue; RasGAP: green) structure and the GDP‐AlF4‐bound G‐domain (cyan). Red and yellow water molecules belong to MnmE and Ras‐RasGAP, respectively. Note the close juxtaposition of the Gln61 side‐chain oxygen and the bridging water (b.w.) from MnmE, and the superimposition of the guanidinium group from the Arg‐finger (Arg789) of RasGAP and the potassium ion from MnmE.

Mg2+ is hexa‐coordinated by the β‐phosphate oxygen and a fluoride, the side‐chain OH of S230 (P‐loop) and T251 (switch I) and two water molecules, one of which is coordinated by D270 from the DTxG motif. Residues from the P‐loop contact the phosphate oxygens by main‐ and side‐chain interactions in the conventional way. Fluorides from AlF4 are bound by main chain hydrogen bonds from G249, T250 and T251 from the 249GTTRD253 motif.

As in most other triphosphate structures or AlFx mimics thereof, there is a water molecule in a position suitable for in‐line attack on the γ‐phosphate. It is stabilised by a main‐chain interaction of G249 from the P‐loop. Unlike in Ras proteins (except Rap), where the attacking water is stabilised by a Gln, in MnmE this water is contacted by another water molecule, which in turn is hydrogen bonded by G273 from the DTxG motif and E282. The latter residue is totally conserved and could potentially activate the nucleophilic water in a way similar to the mechanism suggested for F1‐ATPase (see discussion).

Potassium as a GTPase‐activating element

There is an additional strong electron density peak located between the β‐phosphate and the AlF4, which we assign to a potassium ion (see below). It is coordinated to the main‐chain CO of T245 and I247 that are located in switch I and precede the 249GTTRD253 motif. We named this region (245–248) of switch I the K‐loop. It contacts potassium and forms a cap that shields the ion from solvent. The hexagonal coordination of potassium is complemented by the side‐chain CO of Asn226 (P‐loop), the α‐ and β‐phosphate oxygens of GDP, where the latter represents the former β−γ‐bridging oxygen of GTP and a fluoride ion (Figure 4A and B). The coordination bond lengths of the potassium ion to MnmE and the phosphates of GDP are between 2.67 and 2.99 Å, typical for the coordination of potassium (Supplementary Figure 4). The coordination to AlF4 is weaker with a distance of 3.34 Å. To further confirm the position of the potassium ion, we crystallised the G‐domain by replacing KCl with RbCl, which has similar biochemical effects. The incorporation of Rb+ allowed collection of an anomalous data set owing to the anomalous scattering behaviour of Rb+. The anomalous density of the cation is shown in Figure 4C, contoured at 2σ, with a 2FOFC map surrounding the GDP‐AlFx and Mg2+. As expected, the anomalous signal overlaps the position assigned to the potassium‐binding site.

The active site structure of MnmE in the transition state provides an explanation for the potassium‐induced increase of activity. By adding another positive charge to the active site, the β‐phosphate is surrounded by a total of three positively charged moieties: Lys229 from the P‐loop, the bivalent magnesium and the monovalent potassium ion (Figure 4B). When viewed along the axis from the attacking water to the AlF4, the positive charges form a planar triangle around what represents the former β−γ‐bridging oxygen of GTP. Mg2+ and Lys neutralise the negative charges of phosphates in the ground state, whereas potassium, which is not required for binding of GTP, additionally reduces the developing negative charge in a presumed associative transition state. The GTPase‐activating function of potassium is further supported by the superimposition with the Ras‐RasGAP‐structure (1WQ1; Scheffzek et al, 1997; Figure 4D), where the potassium ion is located at the position of the ‘arginine finger’ (Arg789) guanidinium group in RasGAP, shown to be responsible for a 2000‐fold acceleration of the Ras GTPase.

Potassium binding also stabilises the dimer of the G‐domains by inducing a number of conformational changes. The most relevant is the rearrangement of helix Gα2, the first turn of which contains the conserved residue Glu282 implicated in catalysis by a proton relay system. In the superimposition (Figure 4D), the side‐chain oxygen of Gln61 in Ras is very close to the bridging water in MnmE (1.3 Å). Thus, the function of Gln61 to orient the nucleophilic water is taken over by Glu282 and the bridging water in MnmE. As GAPs like RasGAP and RhoGAP also act by repositioning and/or stabilising the crucial catalytic glutamine in Ras/Rho, this argues for potassium being the major GTPase‐activating element for MnmE, although the details of mechanism are profoundly different.

Dissecting the dimerisation and GTPase reactions

In order to get more insight into the mechanism and to see whether it is possible to uncouple dimer formation and GTPase activation, we used the X‐ray structure to design two types of mutants: those aiming to disrupt the dimerisation, and those that should not interfere with the dimerisation but should affect the GTPase activity. The first class of mutants concerns mutations of residues forming the dimer interface such as I243, D253, L255, the second E282, which is assumed to be involved in catalysis and seems to have no function in dimer formation. As N226 in the P‐loop contacts potassium, its mutation should disrupt ion binding and thus affect both dimerisation and catalytic activity. We obtained crystals of a different space group in (NH4)2SO4 that contained an ammonium ion instead of a potassium ion in the active site, but showed the same dimeric structure as the potassium ion bound form. As ammonium shows comparable GTP hydrolysis and mGDP‐AlFx‐binding activity (results not shown), we reasoned that an N226K mutant might position its N‐ε ammonium group into the active site and show a potassium‐independent fast GTPase activity.

To rule out any appreciable effect of the mutations on nucleotide binding, we determined the affinities to mGDP and mGppNHp for the mutants, in the background of ΔN‐MnmE (Table III). The affinity to mGDP was only reduced maximally approximately five‐fold in the case of the N226A mutant. In general, the affinity was in the range of 0.38–2.59 μM compared to 0.92 μM for wt. For mGppNHp, the maximum effect due to the mutations was not larger than six‐fold, except for L255D, which showed a 15‐fold decrease in affinity.

View this table:
Table 3. Affinities of wt and mutant ΔN‐MnmE to mGDP/mGppNHp

We then analysed the effect of mutations on AlFx‐induced dimerisation of the G‐domains by the mGDP‐AlFx assay, under saturating conditions. As shown in Figure 5A, none of the mutants was able to induce dimerisation in the presence of mGDP, AlFx and potassium, as evident from the absence of fluorescence increase. These results are confirmed by analytical gel filtration (Figure 5B), where none of the mutants elutes as a dimer in the presence of potassium and GDP‐AlFx. The conclusion would therefore be that the mutants either cannot dimerise or that they dimerise but can no longer stabilise the transition state.

To find out, GTP hydrolysis was monitored by fluorescence using mGTP and stopped‐flow kinetics (Figure 5C). Rapid mixing with mGTP leads to an initial increase in fluorescence due to binding of the labelled nucleotide to the protein, with a signal increase from approximately 0.6 to 1.0 relative fluorescence. For wt ΔN‐MnmE (black), besides the signal due to nucleotide binding we monitor an additional fluorescence increase correlated with dimerisation and an amplitude change from 1.0 to 1.4 (compare Figure 5A and C), and a slower decay after hydrolysis due to dissociation of the G‐domains. The N226A mutant, where potassium binding should be compromised, shows no additional fluorescence increase beyond that for nucleotide binding, whereas the E282A and E282Q mutants (cyan) show both fast fluorescence changes, confirming that dimerisation is not influenced, but only a very slow decay. The interface mutants (and N226K) show behaviours between that of wild‐type and the E282 mutants. The studies show that dimerisation precedes catalysis and that dimerisation and hydrolysis can be uncoupled by appropriate mutations.

To verify that the fluorescence decay really monitors the chemical step, we analysed the single turnover GTPase reaction directly by monitoring the decay of GTP and/or the increase of GDP. For wild‐type protein, the reaction is too fast to be measured by HPLC and was analysed by quench‐flow with radioactive GTP. The reaction is complete after 6–8 s (rate constant 47.4/min), well in line with the fluorescence data (compare Figure 5C and D). The E282A and Q mutants were analysed with HPLC and show a 1925‐ and 371‐fold reduction in kcat, respectively, whereas the other mutants show an intermediate phenotype (Table IV). As neither potassium binding nor dimerisation in the presence of GTP is influenced by these mutations, whereas AlFx‐mediated transition state formation is (Figure 5A and B), we conclude that E282 has an important purely catalytic function, such as that of a general base that acts to activate or stabilise the nucleophilic water via an intermediate water molecule. According to this, mutation of E282 to Q should be less drastic than the alanine mutation as it should still be able to stabilise the hydrogen‐bonding network. In the GAP catalysed reaction of Ras and Rho, a catalytic glutamine stabilises the position of the attacking water directly, and its mutation drastically reduces the reaction rate.

View this table:
Table 4. GTPase activities of wt and mutant ΔN‐MnmE

Mutation of N226 is expected to interfere with potassium binding. Correspondingly, N226A shows no fluorescence increase and a reduced hydrolysis rate of 0.484/min, corresponding to a 98‐fold reduction compared to wt. Contrary to expectation, the N226K mutant shows a strong decrease in activity comparable to the N226A mutation (72‐fold reduction). Mutations in the dimer interface (I243D, D253A, L255D) do inhibit the dimerisation in presence of GDP‐AlFx and potassium (Figure 5A and B) and also show a reduced dimerisation in presence of GTP, as deduced from the lower amplitude of fluorescence increase as compared to wt (Figure 5C). As described by Martinez‐Vicente et al (2005), the two arginine residues R252 and R275 are not directly involved in catalysis, which is supported by our data. In the structure, R252 is located in the dimer interface, responsible for part of the binding specificity, whereas R275 stabilises the position of the catalytic E282 by polar interactions. These mutants are unable to stabilise the GDP‐AlFx transition state and show a lower amplitude and slower decay of the fluorescence signal in the stopped‐flow GTPase reaction.


Phosphoryl transfer reactions are most frequently used in biology. This is due to the fact that phosphate monoesters or phospho‐anhydrides are kinetically stable due to high‐energy barriers, which require a delicate enzymatic machinery to achieve fast reaction rates. GTP‐binding proteins have been shown to adopt a variety of mechanisms to accelerate cleavage of GTP, which is intrinsically very slow and is stimulated in a variety of ways. Here, we show that a potassium ion is a central element required for a stable dimerisation of the G‐domains of MnmE and its stimulated hydrolysis. Dimerisation stabilises the switch region and reorients the catalytic Glu282, which in turn positions and/or stabilises the attacking water. As mutation of Glu282 to alanine reduces the hydrolysis rate by 2000‐fold as compared to the 370‐fold reduction of E282Q, we conclude that Glu282 may act as general base or to just stabilise the attacking water. A similar mechanism of water‐mediated proton transfer to an acidic side chain has been proposed for the F1‐ATPase using computational simulation (Dittrich et al, 2004). In that scenario, the proton is eventually transferred to the γ‐phosphate similar to what has also been discussed as substrate‐assisted catalysis for Ras and Rab (Wittinghofer, 2006). General base catalysed proton transfer is also proposed for other phosphoryl transfer reactions such as those of protein kinases, where the mutation of an invariant Asp completely inactivates the enzyme (Gibbs and Zoller, 1991; Johnson et al, 1996).

In previously analysed GTPase reactions, there are two positive charges that are absolutely required for the reaction, the Mg2+ ion forming a bi‐dentate coordination with the β‐γ‐phosphate oxygens and the totally conserved lysine residue from the P‐loop. The GTPase‐activating factor for the MnmE‐mediated GTP hydrolysis is a suitably positioned potassium ion, which is hexa‐coordinated by the nucleotide and residues from the P‐loop and K‐loop. Our experiments show that the binding site is suitable for monovalent cations with an ionic radius in the range of 138 to 152 pm (K+: 138 pm; NH4+: 144 pm; Rb+: 152 pm). Cations smaller or larger in size (Na+: 99 pm; Cs+: 169 pm) do either not bind or do not have the effects described for potassium.

The potassium as a GTPase‐activating element has so far never been described for any GTP‐binding protein. It has however been observed in the structures of the ATPase domain of the Hsc70 and GroEL chaperones. For many small molecule kinases, an influence of monovalent cations on the enzymatic activity was shown biochemically (reviewed in Suelter, 1970). The ATPase of Hsc70 is stimulated 5–10‐fold by potassium and the structure of the N‐terminal ATPase‐fragment of Hsc70 (Wilbanks and McKay, 1995; Sousa and McKay, 1998) shows two potassium‐binding sites close to the phosphates. One of these is coordinated by the β‐phosphate, whereas the second is located close to the free‐phosphate/γ‐phosphate. Interestingly, the site 1 potassium in Hsc70 replaces a conserved lysine residue in actin that contacts the α‐β‐phosphates comparable to the P‐loop lysine in GNBPs that coordinates the β‐γ‐phosphates. The closest structural match to the potassium of MnmE is found in the ADP‐AlFx structure of GroE (1PCQ, Chaudhry et al, 2003; 1KP8, Wang and Boisvert, 2003). In GroE, the monovalent cation induces a 104‐fold increase in ATP hydrolysis.

The GTP‐binding proteins Era and EngA that belong to the same protein family as MnmE (Caldon et al, 2001) show a high degree of similarity in the G1 and G2 motif. To Era, a function as cell‐cycle regulator and translation factor has been assigned and the protein EngA, which contains two G‐domains in a tandem organisation, is essential for growth of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Both proteins contain the conserved G1 motif GRPNxGKS and the GTTRD motif (Era: QTTRH, EngA1: GLTRD, EngA2: GTTRD; Caldon et al, 2001), suggesting that they also show potassium‐dependent GTPase activation.

Recently Martinez‐Vicente et al (2005) have extensively analysed the MnmE‐specific motif 249GTTRD253 in switch I. Alanine mutation of the 249GTTRD253 affected the GTPase, AlFx‐induced complex formation and tRNA modification activity of MnmE, although dimerisation of the G‐domains was not described. Considering the central role of the 249GTTRD253 motif for the dimerisation interface as deduced from the structure (Figure 3A), it becomes obvious that mutations of these and neighbouring residues have an indirect effect on the GTPase activity (Figure 5). Structural analysis also suggests why the G249A (20‐fold) and T251A (92‐fold) mutations have the most drastic effect on GTPase activity. Gly249 assumes the role of the canonical Gly residue from the DxxG motif. It is bound to the γ‐phosphate (here AlF4) via a main‐chain H‐bond and is additionally involved in orienting the attacking water (Wat2). Gly273 from the switch II DxxG motif in turn orients the bridging water molecule (Wat1, Figure 4A). As proposed by Martinez‐Vicente et al, Thr251 (and not Thr250) does indeed correspond to the canonical threonine from switch I and contacts Mg2+ and AlF4 (corresponding to the γ‐phosphate).

We have shown here that potassium induces GTP hydrolysis not only in the G‐domain but also in the full‐length protein. This would require the G‐domains of native MnmE to come closer to each other than observed in the structural model of nucleotide‐free full‐length MnmE (Scrima et al, 2005; 1XZP/1XZQ), with a distance of 54 Å between glycines (G223) in the P‐loop, which is reduced to 32 Å in the GDP‐AlFx structure (Figure 6B). In order for the G‐domains to move into place, one would have to propose a major conformational change. This could be mediated by rigid body movements of the domains relative to each other using the linker between the domains as hinges (Figure 6A, black arrows). Structural independence of the domains is supported by the fact that the ΔN‐MnmE and the G‐domain can be isolated and retain the enzymatic properties of the full‐length protein. Proteolytic digestion of MnmE (Yim et al, 2003) results in fragments of approximately 39 and 36 kDa that could correspond to MnmE molecules lacking most (residues 1–102) or all (1–118) of the N‐terminal fragment, and has also been found in proteolysed crystals of MnmE (Scrima et al, 2005). Proteolysis in the presence of GTP leads to additional proteolytic fragments, supporting a nucleotide‐dependent conformational reorientation between the domains.

Figure 5.

Mutational analysis. (A) mGDP‐AlFx‐induced dimerisation. Preformed complex of wild‐type/mutant ΔN‐MnmE (60 μM) and mGDP (10 μM) was mixed in a 1:1 ratio with 5 mM AlFx in a stopped‐flow apparatus. Mant fluorescence, excited at 360 nm and monitored through a 408 nm cutoff filter, was followed with time. (B) Analysis of dimerisation by gel filtration. ΔN‐MnmE (120 μM) was incubated with 1 mM of GDP, 1 mM AlFx, and Na+ or K+ as indicated, and eluted from a gel filtration column. (C) Stopped‐flow analysis of mGTP binding and hydrolysis. ΔN‐MnmE (60 μM) was mixed with 10 μM of mGTP and the mant fluorescence emission was followed in real time. (D) GTPase activity of the wt and mutant ΔN‐MnmE determined under single‐turnover conditions in the presence of potassium (100 μM ΔN‐MnmE+80 μM GTP), using quench‐flow for analysis of the wild‐type, and HPLC of mutant reactions, as described in Materials and methods.

Figure 6.

Conformational changes in MnmE upon juxtaposition of G‐domains. (A) The homodimer model of full‐length MnmE (orange/purple) in the apo‐form. The catalytic Cys and 5‐formyl‐THF are shown as ball‐and‐stick model. Putative hinge regions for the conformational change induced by the G‐domain dimerisation are marked by arrows. The box depicts the region shown in (C). (B) Model of the G‐domain dimer (green/cyan) in the context of full‐length MnmE, showing that the G‐domains have to move by 22 Å, from 54 to 32 Å, as measured for the Cα‐positions of G223. (C) Detailed view onto the putative tRNA modification centre harbouring the catalytic Cys and the C1‐group donor 5‐formyl‐THF, which are 11 Å apart in the full‐length MnmE structure (1XZQ). (D, E) Proposed model for the activation of MnmE. The potassium‐dependent dimerisation of the G‐domains during GTP hydrolysis (represented by GTP* in E) could lead to an upward movement of the helical domains (D, red arrows), thereby bringing the C‐terminal catalytic cysteine (represented as a thiolate‐anion S in yellow) and the C1‐group donor 5‐formyl‐THF (magenta) in juxtaposition allowing the activation of the uridine base (U) and the formyl transfer.

We have previously shown that the putative active site cysteine of MnmE and the C1 donor group of methylene tetrahydrofolate (5‐formyl‐THF) are 11 Å apart in the structure of THF‐bound nucleotide‐free MnmE (Figure 6C) and could therefore not be simultaneously bound to the same uridine base as required for the proposed tRNA modification scheme (Scrima et al, 2005). The conformational change induced by the dimerisation could close the active site, bringing Cys and the formyl group in juxtaposition to allow the modification reaction to take place (Figure 6C–E). Further structural and biochemical studies on the complete modification reaction with full‐length protein, tRNA and MnmG/GidA are required to support such a model.

Materials and methods

Plasmids and proteins

MnmE E.coli was expressed from plasmid pIC933, a kind gift of ME Armengod. The expression constructs for ΔN‐MnmE (G102–K454) and the G‐domain (G216–G384) were made by PCR using pIC933 as template and cloned into a pET14b plasmid. Mutagenesis was performed using the Quik‐Change method by Stratagene or by the method of overlapping PCR. Overexpression and purification of MnmE full‐length, His6‐tagged ΔN‐MnmE and the mutants have been performed as described in Scrima et al (2005), the G‐domain was prepared as described for His6‐tagged ΔN‐MnmE.


Crystals of G‐domain dimer were obtained using the hanging drop/vapour diffusion method. The protein was incubated in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTE and additionally 1 mM of GDP, 1 mM AlCl3 and 10 mM of NaF. Drops (1 μl) of 10 mg/ml MnmE solution were mixed with 1 μl of reservoir solution (16–19% PEG 3350, 100 mM MES pH 6.0, 200 mM MgCl2 at 20°C). Crystals with ammonium sulphate at 20°C had 1.5 M ammonium sulphate and 100 mM HEPES pH 7.0 in the reservoir. Crystals obtained from the PEG condition were cryoprotected in reservoir solution with 30% PEG 3350. Cryoprotection for ammonium sulphate crystals was obtained with 25% glycerol. For the Rb+‐bound structure, buffers contained RbCl instead of KCl.

Collected data were processed with XDS (Kabsch, 1993). Initial heavy atom sites for SAD phasing were identified with SHELXD (Usón and Sheldrick, 1999). The heavy atom sites were completed using CNS (Brunger et al, 1998). Refinement of the initial sites, phase determination and density modification with SHARP (de La Fortelle and Bricogne, 1997) led to an interpretable density map. The atomic model was built using XtalView/Xfit (McRee, 1999); refinement was carried out with REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al, 1997). Figures were generated using MolScript (Kraulis, 1991) and POV‐Ray (

Preparation of nucleotide‐free protein

For the removal of nucleotide from His6‐tagged MnmE, 20 mg of protein were incubated at 4°C in 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl and 5 mM DTE with 40 U of calf intestine alkaline phosphatase (Roche Diagnostics). Nucleotide degradation to GMP or Guanosine was monitored by HPLC, after which the protein was applied to an Ni‐NTA column and washed with 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM Imidazol and 3 mM β‐ME to remove the GMP/Guanosine and alkaline phosphatase. The protein was eluted with 20 ml 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 250 mM Imidazol and 3 mM β‐ME, concentrated and buffer was exchanged to 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl and 5 mM DTE. Aliquots of the protein were flash‐frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.

Fluorimetry/equilibrium titration

Determination of the equilibrium dissociation constant Kd was performed as described in Scrima et al (2005). Experiments were carried out at 20°C in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTE and 100 mM NaCl or KCl.

Stopped‐flow kinetics

In stopped‐flow experiments to analyse AlFx‐binding, 60 μM protein was preincubated with 10 μM of mGDP. This preformed protein–mant–nucleotide complex was mixed in the stopped‐flow apparatus in a 1:1 ratio with 5 mM AlFx (5 mM AlCl3 plus 50 mM NaF). Hydrolysis of mGTP was analysed by mixing 10 μM of mGTP with 60 μM of protein. The mant‐fluorophor was excited at 360 nm and change in fluorescence was monitored through a 408 nm cutoff filter (SM‐17; Applied Photophysics). Experiments were carried out at 20°C in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTE and 100 mM of the respective alkali salt.

Analytical gel filtration

All analytical gel filtration experiments were performed in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTE and 100 mM NaCl or KCl, and, as indicated, the respective nucleotide and 1 mM of AlFx (1 mM AlCl3 plus 10 mM NaF). In all, 1 mg of protein (corresponding to 270 μM of the G‐domain or 120 μM of ΔN‐MnmE) was incubated for 15 min on ice with nucleotide as stated in the figure legend (and 1 mM AlFx) before application onto the Superdex 75 10/30 or 200 10/30 columns.

Quench‐flow experiment with γ32P‐labelled GTP

For measuring the single‐turnover GTPase of wild‐type ΔN‐MnmE, 200 μM of protein was mixed in a quench‐flow apparatus with 160 μM of GTP containing 20 nCu of γ32P‐labelled GTP (Amersham Biosciences) per μl of nucleotide solution. The experiment was carried out at 20°C (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTE), stopped at various time points with 1 M perchloric acid and neutralised with 8 M potassium‐acetate. Precipitated protein and salt was removed by centrifugation and a volume of 0.6 μl of the supernatant was applied to a silica thin‐layer‐chromatography plate. The mobile phase was 0.65 M KH2PO4 pH 6.5. Free 32P‐phosphate and uncleaved γ32P‐labelled GTP were monitored using a FLA‐3000 PhosphoImager‐System (Fuji, Kanasawa, Japan). Determination of spot intensity was performed with the Software Aida (Raytest GmbH). After background correction, percentage of uncleaved GTP was calculated using the intensity of γ32P‐GTP divided by the intensity of γ32P‐GTP plus the intensity of free 32P‐phosphate (corresponding to GDP).

HPLC analysis of GTPase and nucleotide content

GTP hydrolysis of mutants was analysed by HPLC (Beckman‐Coulter, System Gold). Nucleotides were separated on a hydrophobic C18‐column (Beckman‐Coulter) with 100 mM potassium‐phosphate pH 6.5, 10 mM tert‐butyl‐ammonium‐bromide and 7.5% acetonitril as polar, mobile phase. Reaction conditions for the single‐turnover conditions were analogous to the quench‐flow experiment. In total, 100 μM of protein was incubated with 80 μM of nucleotide in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTE at 20°C. At various time points, 30 μl aliquots were flash‐frozen in liquid nitrogen to stop the reaction. Aliquots were incubated at 95°C for 2 min, denatured protein was removed by centrifugation (1 min, 13000 r.p.m.) and the supernatant applied to the HPLC. For multi‐turnover analysis, 1 μM of protein was incubated with 200 μM GTP in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTE at 20°C containing 100 mM of the respective salt. Further treatment of the samples was analogous to the single‐turnover experiment.


Atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited at the Protein Data Bank.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at The EMBO Journal Online.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure 1 [emboj7601171-sup-0001.pdf]

Supplementary Figure 2 [emboj7601171-sup-0002.pdf]

Supplementary Figure 3 [emboj7601171-sup-0003.pdf]

Supplementary Figure 4 [emboj7601171-sup-0004.pdf]


This work was performed at the Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland. We also gratefully acknowledge the use of beamline ID14‐3 at the ESRF Grenoble. We thank the beamline staff for professional support. We thank Ilme Schlichting, Eckhard Hofmann, Michael Weyand, Olena Pylypenko and Karin Kühnel for data collection; Michael Weyand and Ingrid R Vetter for crystallographic assistance and Simone Kunzelmann for assistance with quench‐flow. We thank Dorothee Kühlmann for technical assistance.


View Abstract