The Escherichia coli disulfide bond isomerase DsbC rearranges incorrect disulfide bonds during oxidative protein folding. It is specifically activated by the periplasmic N‐terminal domain (DsbDα) of the transmembrane electron transporter DsbD. An intermediate of the electron transport reaction was trapped, yielding a covalent DsbC–DsbDα complex. The 2.3 Å crystal structure of the complex shows for the first time the specific interactions between two thiol oxidoreductases. DsbDα is a novel thiol oxidoreductase with the active site cysteines embedded in an immunoglobulin fold. It binds into the central cleft of the V‐shaped DsbC dimer, which assumes a closed conformation on complex formation. Comparison of the complex with oxidized DsbDα reveals major conformational changes in a cap structure that regulates the accessibility of the DsbDα active site. Our results explain how DsbC is selectively activated by DsbD using electrons derived from the cytoplasm.
The correct formation of disulfide bonds is important for the folding and function of many secretory and membrane proteins. Organisms from all kingdoms of life have evolved a diverse range of thiol oxidoreductases that efficiently promote the formation of disulfide bonds (Kadokura and Beckwith, 2001). Membrane‐embedded electron transport pathways have recently been identified in eukaryotes and bacteria that are essential to maintain the oxidoreductases in the correct active redox state (Frand et al., 2000).
The periplasm of Gram‐negative bacteria contains two complementary pathways that catalyze the formation of disulfide bonds (Debarbieux and Beckwith, 1999; Fabianek et al., 2000). The disulfide bond formation pathway adds new disulfide bonds to folding proteins and the disulfide bond isomerization pathway rearranges existing disulfide bonds between incorrectly paired cysteines. The components of the two pathways are termed disulfide bond formation proteins (Dsb proteins) (Fabianek et al., 2000; Ritz and Beckwith, 2001).
The disulfide bond formation pathway catalyzes the formation of new disulfide bonds in folding proteins. DsbA (Bardwell et al., 1991; Akiyama et al., 1992) functions by transferring its active site disulfide bond to folding substrate proteins. The electrons DsbA acquires in the process are passed to the inner membrane protein DsbB (Bardwell et al., 1993; Missiakas et al., 1993; Guilhot et al., 1995; Kishigami et al., 1995), which transfers them to the respiratory chain via a quinone cofactor (Kobayashi et al., 1997; Bader et al., 1999).
The catalyzed formation of disulfides is a rapid non‐specific process and may result in the formation of incorrect disulfide bonds that trap substrate proteins in non‐native conformations (Rietsch et al., 1996; Bader et al., 2000). The disulfide bond isomerization pathway facilitates the rearrangement of these incorrect disulfide bonds, allowing non‐native substrates to refold. DsbC (Missiakas et al., 1994; Shevchik et al., 1994; Zapun et al., 1995; Sone et al., 1997) and its homolog DsbG (Andersen et al., 1997; Bessette et al., 1999) are the primary catalysts of disulfide bond rearrangement.
DsbC is a V‐shaped homodimeric molecule (McCarthy et al., 2000) with a large uncharged cleft, which is the likely binding site for unfolded substrates. The dimer contains two thioredoxin‐fold domains with active site Cys‐Gly‐Tyr‐Cys motifs. The ability of DsbC to rearrange incorrect disulfide bonds requires that the active site cysteines are maintained in the reduced dithiol form, allowing them to attack substrate disulfide bonds. DsbC is exclusively found in the reduced form in vivo (Joly and Swartz, 1997; Rietsch et al., 1997).
The transmembrane electron transporter DsbD (Missiakas et al., 1995) activates oxidized DsbC by reducing the active site cysteines (Rietsch et al., 1997; Stewart et al., 1999) using electrons transported from the cytoplasm. DsbD also reduces the isomerase DsbG and CcmG, a protein involved in the reduction of heme‐binding cysteines in c‐type apocytochromes (Sambongi and Ferguson, 1994; Crooke and Cole, 1995; Fabianek et al., 1998, 1999). The rearrangement and removal of incorrect disulfide bonds consequently depend on the transport of electrons from the cytoplasm into the periplasm by DsbD.
DsbD is an inner membrane protein with a three‐domain structure (Stewart et al., 1999; Chung et al., 2000; Gordon et al., 2000), consisting of an N‐terminal periplasmic domain DsbDα, a central transmembrane domain DsbDβ and a C‐terminal periplasmic domain DsbDγ. DsbD function can be reconstituted by coexpression of the separate domains, α + β + γ (Katzen and Beckwith, 2000). The domains have been proposed to transport electrons sequentially by a cascade of thiol–disulfide exchange reactions. On the cytoplasmic side, thioredoxin donates electrons to the transmembrane domain, DsbDβ. DsbDβ then transfers the electrons to the periplasmic thioredoxin‐like domain DsbDγ, which in turn passes electrons to the active site cysteines of DsbDα. In the final step of the electron transport process, reduced DsbDα specifically interacts with the oxidized form of the three known periplasmic substrate proteins, DsbC, DsbG and CcmG, reducing their active sites (Katzen and Beckwith, 2000; Krupp et al., 2001).
We have recently shown that DsbDα alone can activate DsbC in vitro (Goldstone et al., 2001), suggesting that these two proteins interact directly in a thiol–disulfide exchange reaction and that no other periplasmic components are required. The thiol–disulfide exchange reaction can be trapped at the level of the covalent reaction intermediate between DsbC and DsbDα by substituting the reaction partners with their active site mutants, DsbC C101A/S and DsbDα C103A (Goldstone et al., 2001; Krupp et al., 2001). These mutants lack local free cysteines able to resolve the intermolecular disulfide bond that forms between DsbDα Cys103 and DsbC Cys98.
The disulfide bond isomerization pathway requires electrons to be transported into the periplasm, while the disulfide bond formation pathway depends on the transport of electrons out of the periplasm. To maintain the opposite in vivo redox states of DsbA and DsbC, the electron transport interactions of the two pathways must be distinguished, although DsbA and DsbC interact with numerous folding substrates. How the electron transport processes are separated, even though both DsbA and DsbC have a thioredoxin fold with very similar biochemical properties, is an intriguing question.
To improve our understanding of the electron transport process associated with disulfide bond isomerization, the crystal structures of oxidized DsbDα, DsbC C101S and the DsbC–DsbDα complex were determined. The structure of the trapped DsbC–DsbDα complex shows DsbDα binding into the central cleft of the V‐shaped DsbC dimer. It provides insights into a novel electron transport mechanism across the inner bacterial membrane and suggests a model for DsbC‐catalyzed disulfide bond isomerization. Data from in vivo genetic analysis employing DsbDα mutants are consistent with the observed interactions between DsbDα and DsbC. The comparison of the reaction intermediate with the structures of DsbC C101S and oxidized DsbDα explains how DsbC is specifically activated by DsbD.
Results and discussion
Overview of the DsbC–DsbDα complex structure
The crystal structure of the DsbC–DsbDα complex shows that DsbDα binds into the central cleft of the V‐shaped DsbC homodimer (Figure 1A). Major conformational changes are observed in both molecules, allowing DsbDα to interact with each of the two catalytic domains of the DsbC dimer. The final step of the electron transport process between DsbDα and DsbC is mediated by the interaction of two different types of thiol oxidoreductases. DsbC belongs to the well characterized family of thioredoxin‐like oxidoreductases, while DsbDα is a novel type of oxidoreductase with an immunoglobulin (Ig) fold. The recognition of both DsbC active sites by DsbDα explains the observation that DsbDα selectively interacts with full‐length dimeric DsbC, but not with the separate monomeric catalytic domain (Goldstone et al., 2001). Electrostatic interactions in the primary and secondary binding regions suggest a mechanism by which DsbDα recognizes and specifically reduces the oxidized form of DsbC.
DsbDα is a novel thiol oxidoreductase with an Ig fold
The overall structure of DsbDα reveals an Ig fold consisting of a β‐sandwich formed by two antiparallel β‐sheets and a catalytic subdomain which is inserted in the antigen binding end of the Ig fold (Figure 1B). DsbDα has a classical c‐type Ig fold (Bork et al., 1994) with a four‐stranded β‐sheet (β1, β2, β8 and β5) that packs against a three‐stranded β‐sheet (β4, β9 and β12). The catalytic subdomain is inserted in loops 1, 3 and 5 of the Ig fold, forming a five‐stranded antiparallel β‐sheet. This sheet contains the active site cysteine residues that transport electrons by switching between reduced dithiol and oxidized disulfide bonded forms. The strand β3 in the center of the catalytic subdomain is flanked on one side by strands β10 and β11, which contain the active site cysteine pair. Residue Cys109, the more solvent‐accessible active site cysteine is located in strand β10 and residue Cys103, which forms the active site disulfide bond with Cys109, is on the neighboring strand β11. The catalytic β‐sheet is completed on the opposite side of β3 by strands β6 and β7. These strands together with the connecting loop form a cap structure over the active site as described below. The residues in the catalytic subdomain that surround the active site and the residues of the cap loop are highly conserved (Figure 1D). In a recent paper, Goulding et al. (2002) independently report the 1.65 Å structure of oxidized DsbDα, confirming that the α‐domain has an Ig fold with a catalytic subdomain.
The DsbDα active site is shielded
In the oxidized form of DsbDα, the disulfide bonded cysteines 103 and 109 are completely shielded from the environment by the active site cap (Figure 1B). The cap residue Phe70 inserts directly over Cys109 with the aromatic side chain forming close van der Waals interactions with the sulfur atom of Cys109. Oxidized DsbDα forms a dimer in the crystal and the dimer contacts are exclusively located in the catalytic subdomain of each monomer. The conserved β11 strands of two monomers meet in the dimer interface, forming an extended 10‐stranded antiparallel β‐sheet. The active site Cys109 residues of the two monomers make two backbone hydrogen bonds in the center of the β‐sheet. The dimer interface buries 1016 Å2 surface area, ∼7% of the total molecular surface. Since DsbDα is monomeric in solution (Goldstone et al., 2001), the biological relevance of the DsbDα dimer observed in this crystal structure is unclear. Cap closure and dimerization may function to protect the active site cysteines from non‐specific interactions with other periplasmic components.
The active form of DsbC (C101S) has a solvent‐accessible active site
The overall structure of the disulfide bond isomerase DsbC C101S, which mimics the active reduced form, shows a V‐shaped homodimer with a large central cleft. It closely resembles the structure of the oxidized wild‐type molecule (McCarthy et al., 2000). Each monomer consists of an N‐terminal dimerization domain (1–61) forming the dimer interface and a C‐terminal catalytic domain (78–216) with thioredoxin fold (Figure 1C). The two domains are joined by a flexible linker helix that allows for the movement of the domains.
The catalytic domain contains the active site Cys98‐Gly‐Tyr‐Cys101 motif. It catalyzes disulfide bond rearrangement by an attack of the Cys98 thiol group on a substrate disulfide, yielding a covalent DsbC–substrate complex. The intermolecular disulfide is subsequently resolved by a free substrate cysteine, resulting in a substrate with a rearranged disulfide bond. Alternatively, DsbC Cys101 can attack the intermolecular disulfide, yielding oxidized DsbC and a substrate with a broken disulfide bond.
A comparison between the active sites of oxidized DsbC and DsbC C101S shows that the side chain of Cys98 is rotated by ∼35° towards the solvent in the active form. This rotation exposes an area of 5.5 Å2 of the catalytic sulfur atom, making it accessible to substrates. The active reduced form of DsbC is mainly stabilized by hydrogen bonds of the Cys98 thiolate with backbone amide groups at the N‐terminus of the active site α‐helix.
The DsbC–DsbDα complex reveals two asymmetric binding sites
The crystal structure of the DsbC C101S–DsbDα C103A complex reveals that DsbDα binds into the central cleft of DsbC (Figures 1A, 2A and B). DsbDα interacts with both active sites of DsbC, forming two asymmetric binding sites. DsbDα exclusively binds to the two catalytic domains of the DsbC dimer, and no contacts are observed between DsbDα and the N‐terminal dimerization domains of DsbC.
The primary binding site involves interactions between residues surrounding the active sites of both DsbDα and DsbC (Figure 2C and D), and contains the two catalytic cysteine residues, DsbDα Cys109 and DsbC Cys98, which form a disulfide bond between the two molecules (Figure 1A). In the case of DsbDα, the primary binding region lies entirely in the catalytic subdomain and no primary binding site contacts are made with residues in the core of the DsbDα Ig fold. The residues in the primary binding site are highly conserved in both DsbC and DsbDα.
The secondary binding site includes contacts between the active site region of the second DsbC monomer and residues from strands β1 and β12 of the DsbDα Ig fold (Figure 2C). The recognition of both DsbC active sites explains why DsbDα selectively forms a complex with full‐length dimeric DsbC, but not with the truncated catalytic domain, which is monomeric in solution (Goldstone et al., 2001). On complex formation, 1922 Å2 of total accessible surface area are buried, of which two‐thirds (1268 Å2) can be attributed to the interactions in the primary binding site and one‐third (654 Å2) to the secondary binding site.
The DsbC cleft adjusts to the shape of the binding partner
DsbDα binding induces large conformational changes in DsbC. DsbC assumes a closed conformation with the arms of the V‐shaped dimer enclosing the DsbDα molecule. In the closed conformation, both catalytic domains of DsbC, located at the end of the arms, contact DsbDα (Figure 1A). Hinge movements essentially caused by a 30° rotation about the Ψ angle of Leu67 in the DsbC linker helices result in a shift of the catalytic domains by 13 Å from their positions in oxidized DsbC and DsbC C101S (Figure 3A). The width of the DsbC cleft between the two arms of the V is reduced to 29 Å in the closed conformation. In the open conformation, the width of the binding cleft is 38 Å, as observed in oxidized DsbC and DsbC C101S (Figure 3A). The flexibility of the molecule allows DsbC to adjust the binding cleft according to the size and shape of the binding partner.
The DsbDα cap controls access to the active site
Large conformational changes were also observed between complexed and oxidized DsbDα. In the DsbC–DsbDα complex, the active site cap is in an open conformation exposing the catalytic sulfur of Cys109 (Figure 3B). Residues Leu54–Gln59 are in a β‐strand conformation (β5), resulting in an extension of the first Ig fold β‐sheet.
After DsbC activation and DsbDα oxidation, the cap assumes a closed conformation, shielding the DsbDα active site. Part of the β5 strand separates from the β‐sheet, assuming a loop conformation, and the cap structure closes over the active site. The aromatic side chain of Phe70, which is distant from the active site in the DsbC–DsbDα complex, is displaced by 13 Å on oxidation and makes close van der Waals interactions with the active site disulfide.
In addition to this, several side chains of DsbDα (Phe11, Phe70, Tyr71 and Phe108) that form a complementary binding surface for DsbC in the complex (Figure 2C) change orientation on DsbDα oxidation.
The active sites interact in the conserved primary binding site
The primary binding site accounts for the majority of the interactions between DsbC and DsbDα and is highly conserved. The interactions observed are between either hydrophobic or uncharged polar groups, with the notable exception of DsbDα Asp68 and DsbC Arg125. The lifted active site cap of DsbDα reveals an aromatic pocket consisting of residues Tyr40, Tyr42, Phe70 and Tyr71, which surround the central negatively charged Asp68 (Figure 4A). The DsbC active site (Thr97, Cys98, Gly99), and in particular the highly conserved aromatic side chain of Tyr100, bind into the DsbDα pocket, and the OH groups of DsbC Tyr100 and DsbDα Tyr40 form a hydrogen bond. DsbC Cys98 is positioned just above the strand β11 of DsbDα, which contains Cys109 (Figure 4A). The active site residue Cys109 forms a disulfide bond with the DsbC active site residue Cys98 and it makes two hydrogen bonds with the conserved cis‐proline loop (Gly181–Pro183) of DsbC.
The positive dipole of the DsbC active site α‐helix interacts electrostatically with the complementary negative charge of DsbDα Asp68 via a tightly bound water molecule. The DsbDα active site β‐strand and the adjacent loops (Ala106–Pro112) contact the region surrounding the DsbC active site (Pro194–Tyr196, Gly181–Pro183 and Arg125–Gln126).
The second DsbC active site interacts with residues of the Ig fold
The DsbC–DsbDα interactions in the secondary binding site group around the active site α‐helix (Cys98, Gly99, Tyr100 and Lys103) of the second DsbC catalytic domain. The DsbDα residues involved in binding are Asp21 and Phe22 in the first strand β1, and Pro118 and Ser120 at the end of the last strand β12 of the molecule.
As with the primary binding site, a negatively charged residue (Asp21) interacts with the positive dipole of the N‐terminus of the active site α‐helix (Figure 4B). The following Phe22 interacts with the conserved Tyr100 of the DsbC active site (Figure 4B) by π–π stacking of the aromatic side chains in an edge‐to‐face orientation.
The secondary binding site is approximately half the size of the primary binding site and several water molecules are located in the interface region. Despite the low sequence conservation of DsbDα residues in the secondary binding region, the specific interactions with the second DsbC active site, which is highly conserved among the DsbC homologs, suggest that this binding site is of physiological importance. The existence of two DsbC binding sites on the DsbDα molecule explains why DsbDα preferentially interacts with dimeric DsbC, rather than with monomeric DsbC (Goldstone et al., 2001).
Recognition of inactive oxidized DsbC by DsbDα
The positive dipole at the N‐terminus of the DsbC active site α‐helix is one of the major factors stabilizing the reduced form of the catalytic Cys98 and lowering the pKa of the cysteine sulfur atom (Kortemme and Creighton, 1995; Zapun et al., 1995). In reduced DsbC, the negatively charged deprotonated sulfur atom (Cys98‐S−) neutralizes the positive dipole of the active site α‐helix, but in the oxidized form (Cys98‐S‐S‐Cys101) the uncharged disulfide bond has little effect on the helix dipole.
We propose that DsbDα exploits the changes in the charge distribution of the active site to distinguish between oxidized and reduced forms of DsbC. In the DsbC–DsbDα complex, two negatively charged Asp residues (Asp21 and Asp68) from DsbDα interact with the positive dipoles of each of the two DsbC active site α‐helices. In activated DsbC, the active sites cysteines are reduced and the thiolate groups of the Cys98 residues introduce negative charges at the N‐termini of the active site α‐helices. This results in a charge repulsion between the DsbC active sites and the DsbDα residues Asp68 and Asp21, decreasing the binding affinity of DsbDα for the reduced form of the disulfide bond isomerase. In this model, the interactions between DsbC and DsbDα primarily result from the large binding surfaces, but the binding affinity is modulated by the charge repulsion. DsbDα would preferentially interact with fully oxidized DsbC, followed by DsbC with one oxidized and one reduced active site, and the binding affinity would be weakest for fully reduced DsbC.
In vivo characterization of the DsbC–DsbDα interactions
To validate the significance of the observed interactions between DsbC and DsbDα, the function of mutant proteins was investigated by determining their in vivo redox state using reconstituted two‐ or three‐piece DsbD systems (Katzen and Beckwith, 2000). Ten amino acid substitutions corresponding to the primary (Figure 2C, F11A, Y40A, Y42A, D68R, F70R, Y71A, Q101N and F108A) and the secondary (Figure 2C, D21R and F22R) binding sites were chosen and incorporated individually into a His6‐tagged derivative of DsbDα.
Although the steady thiol redox state of DsbDα ranged between 50 and nearly 100% oxidized, depending on the mutation, no differences in the DsbC redox state were observed. We reasoned that stronger perturbations of DsbDα might cause a clearly observable effect on DsbC reduction. Pairs of mutations that alter the same binding site were combined and their effects on DsbC reduction were analyzed by employing the three separate domains α + β + γ in the context of a dsbD−, trxA− background strain. (This analysis is possible in a trxA− background because the overexpression of the DsbD domains generates enough reduced DsbDα to sustain DsbC reduction.)
DsbDα variants harboring two mutations in the primary binding site have modest effects on the redox state of DsbC (Figure 5A, compare lanes 3–8 with 2). However, the combination of two mutations of the secondary binding site showed a profound effect on the DsbC redox state, comparable to that seen when any domain of DsbD (in this case DsbDγ) is removed from the system (Figure 5A, compare lanes 1 and 9). All DsbDα mutants show less propensity to be reduced by DsbDγ compared with wild‐type DsbDα (Figure 5B, compare lanes 3–9 with 2). This is not surprising since DsbDγ is believed to have a thioredoxin‐like fold, so it is conceivable that both DsbDγ and DsbC interact with a similar set of DsbDα residues. Since the molar ratio of DsbDα/DsbC in the three‐piece system is much larger than the DsbDγ/DsbDα ratio, only a very small proportion of DsbDα is needed to be reduced in order to activate DsbC.
Model for selective activation of oxidized dimeric DsbC
The structure of the DsbDα–DsbC complex demonstrates that the transport process is mediated by a thiol–disulfide exchange reaction between DsbC and DsbDα. The electron transport reaction is initiated by binding of reduced DsbDα into the substrate binding cleft of oxidized DsbC. The binding induces major conformational changes and DsbC assumes a closed conformation allowing interactions between the two DsbC catalytic domains and DsbDα. The interaction with both catalytic domains explains the preferential binding of DsbDα to the dimeric form of DsbC, as observed in our previous in vitro studies (Goldstone et al., 2001).
We propose a model where DsbDα distinguishes oxidized from reduced DsbC by interacting with the positive dipoles of the two active site α‐helices in oxidized DsbC. The open conformation of the DsbDα active site cap exposes the DsbC binding pocket and the catalytic residue Cys109 of DsbDα. Our results show that the four sulfur atoms of the catalytic residues involved in the thiol–disulfide exchange reaction are appropriately aligned for the following nucleophilic attack of DsbDα Cys109 on the active site disulfide of oxidized DsbC. In the course of the reaction, Cys109 forms an intermolecular disulfide bond with Cys98 of DsbC. The intermediate disulfide bond is resolved by the nucleophilic attack of the free Cys103 from DsbDα, yielding reduced DsbC and oxidized DsbDα. In this model, the DsbC–DsbDα complex dissociates because of the charge repulsion between the DsbDα residue Asp68 and the Cys98 thiolate of reduced DsbC.
The overall reduction of DsbC involves a series of electron transfers across the inner membrane mediated by proteins that consistently alternate between thioredoxin family members (trx) and non‐family members: thioredoxin reductase to thioredoxin (trx) to DsbDβ to DsbDγ (trx) to DsbDα to DsbC (trx).
The structure of the DsbC–DsbDα complex also suggests how the electron transfer reactions of the disulfide bond formation and isomerization pathways are isolated. On one hand, DsbC dimerization increases its affinity for the two independent binding sites on DsbDα, while protecting it from oxidation by DsbB (Bader et al., 2001). On the other hand, steric hindrance due to the extended helical domain of DsbA, as observed in the superpositioned structures of DsbA and the DsbC–DsbDα complex, prevents DsbA from being unspecifically reduced by DsbD.
Implications for the isomerase function of DsbC
The crystal structure of the DsbC–DsbDα complex can serve as an initial model for the interactions of the disulfide bond isomerase DsbC with folding substrate proteins. The interactions between DsbC and DsbDα include a total of 13 aromatic residues (nine in the primary binding site). The DsbC residue with the largest contribution to both binding sites is the conserved Tyr100 found in the active site motif. A random mutagenesis screen of the active site dipeptide for increased isomerase activity has revealed the preference of an aromatic residue (Tyr/Phe) in this location (Bessette et al., 2001). This result is consistent with the structure of the DsbC–DsbDα complex, where residue Tyr100 inserts into an uncharged pocket next to the catalytic cysteine (Cys109) of DsbDα (Figure 4A). The complex is further stabilized by the hydrogen bonds of Cys109 with the conserved cis‐proline loop of DsbC.
During disulfide bond isomerization, similar interactions may occur. DsbC Tyr100 is likely to interact with aromatic or hydrophobic residues exposed by misfolded substrate proteins bound to the uncharged central cleft of DsbC. The cis‐proline loop orients the substrate disulfide for the nucleophilic attack by Cys98. The intermolecular disulfide formed between Cys98 of DsbC and the substrate can subsequently be resolved either by a free substrate cysteine or by Cys101 of DsbC, resulting in the isomerization or breakage of the substrate disulfide. Substrate refolding is further facilitated by the chaperone activity of DsbC.
The structures of the complex and of oxidized DsbDα demonstrate the principal ability of DsbC to catalyze the rearrangement of disulfide bonds even if they are buried in the final structure. During refolding, conformational rearrangements in the substrate are expected. The comparison of complexed with uncomplexed DsbC shows that the substrate binding cleft can adjust to the shape of the binding partner, allowing DsbC to interact with a broad range of substrate proteins in different conformations.
In this paper, we provide structural insights into the final step of a novel transmembrane electron transport process in Escherichia coli and discuss the implications of our results for the process of disulfide bond isomerization during oxidative protein folding. We trapped an electron transport intermediate and determined its crystal structure and those of the two reaction products, oxidized DsbDα and reduced DsbC, which is in this case represented by DsbC C101S.
The structure of the DsbC–DsbDα complex shows that the electron transport is mediated by two different families of thiol oxidoreductases. DsbC belongs to the thioredoxin‐fold oxidoreductases, while DsbDα is a new type of thiol oxidoreductase with an Ig fold. Our findings represent the first structure of a complex between thiol oxidoreductases of different families. Similar thiol–disulfide exchange reactions between alternating families of thiol oxidoreductases appear to be the common mode of electron transfer in related pathways (Katzen and Beckwith, 2000), i.e. the bacterial DsbA/DsbB pathway and the eukaryotic PDI/Ero1 pathway (Frand and Kaiser, 1998; Tu et al., 2000). The approach used (trapping mixed disulfides) and the structural features observed are essential for further elucidating the mechanism of transfer between such families. Furthermore, proteins with an Ig fold and appropriately positioned cysteines can now be regarded as candidates for novel oxidoreductases in genome searches for proteins exhibiting oxidoreductase activity, both in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The results presented also provide a first model for the interaction of the chaperone/protein disulfide bond isomerase DsbC with misfolded (misoxidized) substrate proteins. Previous evidence suggested that DsbDα exists in an unstable, unfolded state when it is fixed in the ‘reduced’ conformation by mutation of either of its cysteines (Katzen and Beckwith, 2000). Substrates with exposed hydrophobic patches are recognized by the uncharged cleft of DsbC and the two active Cys‐Xaa‐Xbb‐Cys motifs catalyze the rearrangement of incorrect disulfide bonds. The concurrent refolding of the substrate is facilitated by the chaperone activity of DsbC.
Materials and methods
Plasmid pFK119 encodes the cytoplasmic variant of DsbDα C103A with an N‐terminal His6 tag (Goldstone et al., 2001). The dsbC mutant C101S without signal sequence was amplified from DsbCC101S‐pET22 using the primers 5′‐GCTTTGCCATGGCTGATGACGC‐3′ and 5′‐CTAGTT ATTGCTCAGCGGTGGCAGC‐3′, and cloned into NcoI‐ and BamHI‐linearized pProEX HT (Life Technologies). The gene was inserted downstream of a His6 tag and a tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage site. Plasmid sequences were verified by DNA sequencing.
Protein expression, purification and complex preparation
DsbC C101S and native DsbDα were expressed and purified as described previously (McCarthy et al., 2000; Goldstone et al., 2001). His6‐DsbC C101S was expressed in E.coli BL21 DE3 cells and purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using a 5 ml Hi‐Trap Chelating column (Amersham Pharmacia) pre‐loaded with nickel. The His6 tag was removed by TEV digestion (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 0.5 mM EDTA and 2 mM β‐mercaptoethanol) and the protein purified by IMAC. His6‐DsbDα C103A was prepared as described previously (Goldstone et al., 2001) and the His6 tag was removed by TEV (Life Technologies) digestion.
The complex between DsbC C101S and DsbDα C103A was formed as described previously (Haebel et al., 2001) and the complex formation reaction was monitored by non‐reducing SDS–PAGE. The DsbC C101S–DsbDα C103A complex was purified by size‐exclusion chromatography using a Superdex75 column (Amersham Pharmacia).
Crystallization, data collection and processing
Purified DsbC C101S was dialyzed into 10 mM HEPES pH 7.0 and concentrated to 28 mg/ml. Crystals were grown by the hanging drop vapor diffusion method using microseeding. Crystals grew after 3–5 days from 25% PEG 550 MME and 100 mM Tris–HCl pH 9.0. After crystal dehydration (McCarthy et al., 2000), diffraction data for DsbC C101S crystals were collected under cryogenic conditions on beamline BL9‐2 at the SSRL (λ = 0.98 Å). Data were processed using DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski and Minor, 1997). The crystals belong to the space group P212121 with a = 59.4 Å, b = 78.3 Å and c = 95.6 Å, and the asymmetric unit contained two molecules.
Oxidized DsbDα (20 mg/ml) was crystallized from 23% PEG4000, 0.1 M NaCH3CO2 pH 4.6, 0.1 M (NH4)2SO4 using the hanging drop method. Diffraction data for oxidized DsbDα were collected under cryogenic conditions on beamline BL9‐2 at the SSRL (λ = 0.98 Å). Data were processed with DENZO and SCALEPACK, revealing that DsbDα crystallized in the space group C2221 with a = 53.1 Å, b = 54.6 Å and c = 102.5 Å, and one molecule in the asymmetric unit.
The DsbC C101S–DsbDα C103A complex was crystallized using the hanging drop method and streak seeding. The precipitant buffer contained 25% PEG5 k MME, 0.2 M NaCl, 0.05 M (NH4)2SO4, 5% glycerol, 0.2 M NaCH3CO2 pH 4.9. Needle‐shaped crystals were fragmented and dehydrated prior to flash cooling in liquid nitrogen (Haebel et al., 2001). Diffraction data were collected at 100 K on beamline ID29 at the ESRF (λ = 0.98 Å). The complex crystallized in space group P41212 with a = b = 68.9 Å and c = 230.3 Å, and contained one complex molecule consisting of a DsbC homodimer and a DsbDα monomer in the asymmetric unit. Data were processed using MOSFLM and SCALA (CCP4, 1994; Powell, 1999).
Crystallographic statistics are summarized in Table I.
Structure determination and refinement
The structure of DsbC C101S was solved by molecular replacement using AMORE (CCP4, 1994) with native DsbC [Protein Data Bank (PDB) access code 1eej] as the search model. DsbC C101S was build using program O (Jones et al., 1991) and refined with CNS (Brünger et al., 1998) using a maximum likelihood target function with bulk solvent correction. After the addition of water molecules, the refinement with 1.9 Å data converged at an R factor = 0.220 and Rfree = 0.246. The model contains residues A1–A215, B1–B216 and 247 water molecules. The side chains of residues 157–162 are poorly defined. The model shows excellent stereochemistry with all residues except Asp129 in most favored and additionally allowed regions of the Ramachandran plot.
The structure of the DsbC C101S–DsbDα C103A complex was determined by molecular replacement using MOLREP (Vagin and Teplyakov, 2000) at 4.5 Å resolution with one DsbC C101S monomer as search model. Two copies of DsbC C101S were found in the asymmetric unit. Rigid body refinement using CNS with each DsbC C101S monomer divided into two separate domains resulted in a model with R factor = 0.450 and Rfree = 0.485. ARP/wARP (Perrakis et al., 1999) helped to remove model bias and produced a high quality electron density map at 2.3 Å that allowed the building of DsbDα C103A in the program O. The structure was refined with CNS using simulated annealing with maximum likelihood target function and torsion angle dynamics. The final model refined to a final R factor = 0.234 and Rfree = 0.293. The structure contains residues A4–A215 and B1–B214 of the DsbC C101S dimer, residues C8–C125 of Dsbα C103A and 124 water molecules. The side chains of the DsbC loop 158–164 and the side chains of the last two C‐terminal residues of DsbDα are poorly defined in the density. The model has good stereochemistry and the DsbDα residue Asp79, which is in a disallowed region of the Ramachandran plot, assumes a γ‐loop conformation.
The structure of oxidized DsbDα was determined by molecular replacement with MOLREP using the structure of DsbDα C103A from the DsbC–DsbDα complex as search model. The structure was updated using ARP/wARP and refined to a final R factor = 0.216 and Rfree = 0.254 in CNS. The final model contains residues 10–125 and 87 water molecules and has excellent stereochemistry. Residue Asp79 is located in a γ‐loop, as observed in complexed DsbDα. The coordinates for DsbC C101S (PDB accession code 1jzo), oxidized DsbDα (PDB accession code 1jpe) and the DsbC C101S–DsbDα C103A complex (PDB accession code 1jzd) were deposited at the PDB.
In vivo thiol redox‐state analysis
To determine the in vivo redox state of DsbDα and DsbC, strains FED126 (MC1000 ΔdsbD) or FED161 (FED126 ΔtrxA) carrying the corresponding DsbD derivatives were grown and processed as described previously (Katzen and Beckwith, 2000). Free thiols were acid‐trapped and alkylated with the high molecular mass reagent AMS (4‐acetamido‐4′‐maleimidylstilbene‐2,2′‐disulfonic acid; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR).
DsbDα, DsbDβ, DsbDγ and DsbDβγ derivatives were expressed from plasmids pFK086, pFK060, pFK017 and pFK094, respectively (Katzen and Beckwith, 2000). When indicated, corresponding amino acids were mutated using the QuikChange site‐directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) as directed by the manufacturer. All the constructions were verified by DNA sequencing.
We thank G.Leonard and G.Sainz for assistance with data collection on the ESRF beamline ID29. A.Scheidig kindly facilitated access to beamline BW7B at DESY and P.Ellis provided assistance on beamline BL9‐2 at the SSRL. P.W.H. is supported by a Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds doctoral scholarship. D.G. is the recipient of a FRST Bright Future Scholarship and F.K. is a Charles A.King Trust fellow. J.B. is an American Cancer Society Research Professor and work in the J.B. laboratory is supported by Grant GM55090 from the NIH. Research in the Metcalf laboratory is funded by the New Zealand Health Research Council and the Auckland Medical Research Foundation.
- Copyright © 2002 European Molecular Biology Organization