The crystal structure of the phosphorylated, activated form of the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase in complex with a peptide substrate and an ATP analog has been determined at 1.9 Å resolution. The activation loop (A‐loop) of the kinase undergoes a major conformational change upon autophosphorylation of Tyr1158, Tyr1162 and Tyr1163 within the loop, resulting in unrestricted access of ATP and protein substrates to the kinase active site. Phosphorylated Tyr1163 (pTyr1163) is the key phosphotyrosine in stabilizing the conformation of the tris‐phosphorylated A‐loop, whereas pTyr1158 is completely solvent‐exposed, suggesting an availability for interaction with downstream signaling proteins. The YMXM‐containing peptide substrate binds as a short anti‐parallel β‐strand to the C‐terminal end of the A‐loop, with the methionine side chains occupying two hydrophobic pockets on the C‐terminal lobe of the kinase. The structure thus reveals the molecular basis for insulin receptor activation via autophosphorylation, and provides insights into tyrosine kinase substrate specificity and the mechanism of phosphotransfer.
Insulin stimulates numerous intracellular signaling pathways that regulate cellular metabolism and growth (White and Kahn, 1994). The physiological effects of insulin are mediated by its cell surface receptor, an α2β2 transmembrane glycoprotein with intrinsic protein tyrosine kinase activity (Ebina et al., 1985; Ullrich et al., 1985). Binding of insulin to the extracellular α‐chains results in autophosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic portion of the β‐chains: two in the juxtamembrane region, three in the kinase (catalytic) domain, and two in the C‐terminal tail (Tornqvist et al., 1987; Tavare et al., 1988; White et al., 1988; Feener et al., 1993; Kohanski, 1993). Autophosphorylation of Tyr1158, Tyr1162 and Tyr1163 in the activation loop (A‐loop) of the kinase domain is critical for stimulation of kinase activity and biological function (Rosen et al., 1983; Ellis et al., 1986).
The vast majority of receptor tyrosine kinases contain between one and three tyrosine residues in the kinase A‐loop, which comprises subdomains VII and VIII of the protein kinase catalytic core (Hanks et al., 1991). In addition to the insulin receptor, other receptor tyrosine kinases whose biological function has been shown to depend on tyrosine autophosphorylation in the A‐loop include insulin‐like growth factor 1 (IGF‐1) receptor (Kato et al., 1994), fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (Mohammadi et al., 1996a), hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) (Longati et al., 1994), nerve growth factor receptor (TRKA) (Mitra, 1991), and brain‐derived neurotrophic factor receptor (TRKB) (Middlemas et al., 1994).
The crystal structure of the unphosphorylated, low activity form of the insulin receptor kinase domain (IRK) has been reported previously (Hubbard et al., 1994). This structure suggested an autoinhibitory mechanism whereby Tyr1162 in the A‐loop competes with protein substrates for binding in the active site, while residues in the beginning of the A‐loop restrict access to ATP such that cis‐autophosphorylation of Tyr1162 is prevented. Here, the crystal structure at 1.9 Å resolution of the tris‐phosphorylated, activated form of IRK (IRK3P) in complex with a peptide substrate and an ATP analog is presented. The conformational changes that occur upon autophosphorylation provide an understanding at the molecular level of the role of autophosphorylation in the activation of the insulin receptor and presumably other receptor tyrosine kinases. Moreover, the structure reveals the mode of peptide substrate binding to the insulin receptor kinase, and affords insights into the phosphotransfer mechanism.
Results and discussion
A 306‐residue fragment of the β‐chain of the human insulin receptor which possesses tyrosine kinase activity was produced in a baculovirus/insect cell expression system (Wei et al., 1995). Cytoplasmic residues that are not included in the expressed protein are the first 25 (juxtamembrane region) and the last 72 (C‐terminal tail). Addition of MgATP to the purified kinase results in autophosphorylation of Tyr1158, Tyr1162 and Tyr1163 as confirmed by mass spectrometry and microsequencing of tryptic peptides (Wei et al., 1995). Crystals belonging to trigonal space group P3221 were obtained from a ternary complex consisting of IRK3P, an 18‐residue peptide substrate and a non‐hydrolyzable ATP analog, adenylyl imidodiphosphate (AMP‐PNP).
The structure of the ternary complex was solved by molecular replacement using the structure of IRK as a search model, and has been refined at 1.9 Å resolution with a crystallographic R‐value of 19.6% (6.0–1.9 Å, F>2σ). The atomic model includes all but the three N‐terminal residues of IRK3P, one AMP‐PNP molecule, two Mg2+ ions, six residues of the peptide substrate and 202 water molecules. An electron density map in the vicinity of the active site is shown in Figure 1, data collection and refinement statistics are given in Table I, and a ribbon diagram of ternary IRK3P is shown in Figure 2A.
Activation loop conformation
In the unliganded IRK structure determined previously (Hubbard et al., 1994), the A‐loop (residues 1149–1170) traverses the cleft between the N‐ and C‐terminal lobes such that both protein substrate and ATP binding sites are occupied. Tyr1162 in the A‐loop is bound in the active site, hydrogen‐bonded to the putative catalytic base (Asp1132), and residues of the protein kinase‐conserved 1150DFG sequence in the beginning of the A‐loop occupy the ATP binding site. Autophosphorylation of Tyr1158, Tyr1162 and Tyr1163 results in a dramatic change in the conformation of the A‐loop (Figures 2B and 4A). Tyr1158, for example, is displaced ∼30 Å from its position in the unphosphorylated A‐loop. The conformation of the tris‐phosphorylated A‐loop permits unrestricted access to the binding sites for ATP and protein substrates.
The tris‐phosphorylated A‐loop is stabilized to various extents by the phosphotyrosine (pTyr) residues (Figure 4B). The phosphate group of pTyr1163 bridges the A‐loop via hydrogen bonds to the side chain of Arg1155 on one side of the loop and to the backbone amide nitrogen of Gly1166 on the other side. In addition to the electrostatic interaction with Arg1155, the phenolic ring of pTyr1163 is packed against the aliphatic portion of the Arg1155 side chain. Arg1155 is also hydrogen‐bonded to the carbonyl oxygen of the preceding residue. Arginine or lysine is highly conserved in the tyrosine kinase family at this position. The phosphate group of pTyr1162 makes two hydrogen bonds to the side chain of Arg1164. For receptor tyrosine kinases with tandem tyrosine residues corresponding to Tyr1162 and Tyr1163 (e.g. TRK, FGF receptor), an arginine or lysine is often found at the Arg1164 position. The phosphate group of pTyr1158 makes no protein contacts and consequently is the least ordered of the three phosphate groups.
Two short β‐strand interactions also serve to stabilize the tris‐phosphorylated A‐loop. β9 in the A‐loop is paired with β6, which precedes the catalytic loop (residues 1130–1137), and β10 in the A‐loop is paired with β12 between αEF and αF (Figures 2A and 3). This pairing scheme leaves β11, which in IRK was paired with β10, available for interaction with a protein substrate. Compared with the unphosphorylated A‐loop, which was poorly ordered for residues 1152–1157, the tris‐phosphorylated A‐loop is relatively well ordered.
The conformation of the tris‐phosphorylated A‐loop is in general similar to that of the mono‐phosphorylated A‐loop of cyclic AMP‐dependent protein kinase (cAPK) (Knighton et al., 1991), cyclin‐dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) (Russo et al., 1996) and the Src‐family tyrosine kinase LCK (Yamaguchi and Hendrickson, 1996). A comparison with these kinase structures reveals that pTyr1163 in the IRK A‐loop is structurally related to phosphothreonine (pThr)197 in cAPK, pThr160 in CDK2 and pTyr394 in LCK (Figure 4B–D).
Although pTyr1163 is in a spatial position similar to pThr197/pThr160 in cAPK/CDK2, the number of hydrogen‐bonding interactions in which pTyr1163 participates is far fewer than for the pThr residues (Figure 4B and C). Arg1131, the residue which immediately precedes the putative catalytic base, Asp1132, is highly conserved in both the tyrosine and serine/threonine kinase families. In the cAPK and CDK2 structures (Knighton et al., 1991; Russo et al., 1996), the corresponding arginine is directly hydrogen‐bonded to the pThr. Arg1131, however, is not observed to interact directly with pTyr1163. In the LCK structure, pTyr394 is also engaged in relatively few interactions, differing somewhat from those seen for pTyr1163 (Figure 4D), which suggests a susceptibility of these pTyr residues to the action of tyrosine phosphatases (Yamaguchi and Hendrickson, 1996).
A comparison of the phosphorylated A‐loops of IRK3P and LCK (one residue shorter) shows that the conformation is similar at the beginning of the loop, which includes the conserved 1150DFG residues (382DFG), but diverges after pTyr1163 (pTyr394) (Figure 4B and D). Residues at the end of the LCK A‐loop, including kinase‐conserved Pro403 (Pro1172), are displaced further from the active site than the corresponding residues in IRK3P. Interestingly, based on the mode of peptide substrate binding observed in the present structure (discussed below), the C‐terminal end of the A‐loop in the unliganded LCK structure is not properly positioned for peptide binding.
The rearrangement of the insulin receptor A‐loop upon autophosphorylation facilitates a reorientation of the N‐ and C‐terminal lobes of the kinase, which is necessary for productive ATP binding. In the structure of the unphosphorylated kinase domain of the FGF receptor, the ATP binding site is accessible, yet full engagement of ATP by the kinase does not occur due to interactions that impede lobe rotation (Mohammadi et al., 1996b). In the IRK structure, the lobes are held apart by steric interactions between residues of the nucleotide‐binding loop (1003–1008) and the 1150DFG residues. When the C‐terminal lobes of IRK and ternary IRK3P are superimposed, a nearly pure rotation of the N‐terminal lobe of IRK by ∼21° aligns the five‐stranded β‐sheets (Figure 2B). The direction of the rotation is both towards the C‐terminal lobe and parallel to the long axis of the molecule. Three pivot points in the rotation can be identified: two in the loop between αC and β4 (near Phe1054 and Arg1061) and one near the last residue of β5 (Glu1077), just before the segment connecting the two lobes (between β5 and αD). The protein kinase‐conserved glycine in the connecting segment, Gly1082, does not appear to play a role in facilitating lobe movement.
With respect to cAPK, the only other protein kinase for which structures of a ternary complex (with nucleotide and peptide) have been reported (Bossemeyer et al., 1993; Zheng et al., 1993), the lobes of IRK3P are rotated by ∼17°. Despite this difference, the actual lobe separation in the IRK3P and cAPK structures is similar as measured by the Cα–Cα distance between Val1010 (Val57) and Met1139 (Leu173), which flank the ATP adenine. This distance is 12.8 Å in ternary IRK3P (15.0 Å in IRK) and 12.9 Å in ternary cAPK. The lobe configuration in unliganded LCK (Yamaguchi and Hendrickson, 1996) is ∼8° more open than that in ternary IRK3P, with a corresponding lobe–lobe separation of 13.9 Å.
Upon lobe closure, the β‐sheet in the N‐terminal lobe of IRK3P moves approximately as a rigid body. However, αC rotates an additional ∼35° towards the C‐terminal lobe (Figure 2C). This movement of αC places protein kinase‐conserved Glu1047 in proximity (4.4 Å) to conserved Lys1030 in the ATP binding site. Three hydrophobic residues which lie along the same face of αC, Leu1038, Ile1042 and Leu1045, are solvent‐exposed in the IRK3P structure, whereas the latter two residues are partially buried in the IRK structure (Figure 2C). These hydrophobic residues, which are not conserved in the tyrosine kinase family, are perhaps involved in protein–protein interactions specific to insulin receptor subfamily members.
The entire AMP‐PNP molecule is well ordered in the ternary IRK3P structure (Figure 1), indicative of a productive binding mode. The interactions of AMP‐PNP with IRK3P are illustrated in Figure 5. The adenine is situated between Val1010 and Met1139, and hydrogen‐bonded to backbone groups of Glu1077 and Met1079. One of the ribose hydroxyl groups (O2′) is hydrogen‐bonded to the side chain of Asp1083, and the other (O3′) is hydrogen‐bonded via a water molecule to the carbonyl oxygen of Arg1136 in the catalytic loop. The analogous interactions for the adenine and ribose are observed in the ternary cAPK structure (Bossemeyer et al., 1993; Zheng et al., 1993), except that O3′ is hydrogen‐bonded directly to the carbonyl oxygen of Glu170 (Arg1136).
The interactions of the nucleotide phosphate groups with IRK3P residues differ from those observed in the ternary cAPK structure. In cAPK, the nucleotide‐binding loop is hydrogen‐bonded via three backbone groups to the β‐ and γ‐phosphates of ATP (Bossemeyer et al., 1993; Zheng et al., 1993). In IRK3P, only one hydrogen bond is observed, between the backbone amide nitrogen of Ser1006 and the β‐phosphate (Figure 5). Moreover, in cAPK, protein kinase‐conserved Lys72 is hydrogen‐bonded to the α‐ and β‐phosphates, whereas in IRK3P, Lys1030 is hydrogen‐bonded to just the α‐phosphate.
The greater extension of the nucleotide‐binding loop over the phosphates in ternary cAPK is probably due to hydrogen‐bonding between the loop and the peptide inhibitor PKI (Bossemeyer et al., 1993). In the ternary IRK3P structure, no interactions are observed between the nucleotide‐binding loop and the peptide substrate. Owing to the longer side chain of tyrosine versus serine/threonine, the peptide substrate is positioned significantly further away from the N‐terminal lobe in IRK3P than in cAPK (Figure 4B and C). It is likely, therefore, that the lack of interaction with the nucleotide‐binding loop is a general feature of protein substrate–tyrosine kinase interactions.
Two well‐ordered Mg2+ ions have been included in the atomic model based on the heights of the electron density peaks and the number and distances of coordinating atoms (Figures 1 and 5). Mg1 shows nearly ideal octahedral coordination by six oxygen atoms (Mg…O = 2.0–2.2 Å): one from each of the β‐ and γ‐phosphates, one from each of the side chains of protein kinase‐conserved Asn1137 (catalytic loop) and Asp1150 (A‐loop), and two from well‐ordered water molecules (Figure 5). Mg2 has seven oxygen ligands (Mg…O = 2.4–2.6 Å): the same β‐phosphate oxygen that coordinates Mg1, both carboxylate oxygens of Asp1150, and four water molecules. Mg1 and Mg2 are in positions similar to those of the inhibitory and activating metal ions, respectively, in ternary cAPK (Bossemeyer et al., 1993; Zheng et al., 1993), but the coordination by the phosphate groups differs. Mg1 is coordinated by the β‐ and γ‐phosphates, whereas the inhibitory metal ion in ternary cAPK is coordinated by the α‐ and γ‐phosphates. Mg2 is coordinated by just the β‐phosphate, whereas the activating metal ion in ternary cAPK is coordinated by the β‐ and γ‐phosphates. The coordination environment of Mg1 is strikingly similar to that of the Mg2+ ion in the structures of GTPases such as Ras (with MgGMP‐PNP; Pai et al., 1990) and transducin‐α (with MgGTPγS; Noel et al., 1993), wherein the Mg2+ ion is octahedrally coordinated by the β‐ and γ‐phosphates, two side‐chain oxygens, and two water molecules, in the same spatial configuration as found in the ternary IRK3P structure.
Peptide substrate binding
The 18‐residue peptide substrate that was co‐crystallized with IRK3P and MgAMP‐PNP was derived from a putative insulin receptor phosphorylation site on rat IRS‐1, Tyr727 (Sun et al., 1991). This peptide, KKKLPATGDYMNMSPVGD, has a reported Km of 24 μM (Shoelson et al., 1992). Of the 18 residues, supporting electron density is seen for only six, from the P−2 to the P+3 residue [GDYMNM; P‐residue is the acceptor tyrosine, Tyr(P)]. The residues C‐terminal to Tyr(P) form a short β‐strand which pairs in an anti‐parallel manner with residues of β11 at the end of the A‐loop (Figures 2A and 6B). Backbone hydrogen‐bonding is observed between Met(P+1) and Leu1171, and between Met(P+3) and Gly1169.
Tyrosine residues in YMXM motifs are efficient substrates of the insulin receptor in vitro and in vivo (Shoelson et al., 1992; Sun et al., 1993; Songyang et al., 1995). In the ternary IRK3P structure, the methionine side chains of the peptide fit into two adjacent hydrophobic pockets on the surface of the C‐terminal lobe, composed of residues from the P+1 loop (1171–1176) and from αEF and αG (Figure 6). The pocket for Met(P+1) comprises Val1173, Leu1219 and the aliphatic portions of the Asn1215 and Glu1216 side chains. The pocket for Met(P+3) comprises Leu1171, Val1173, Met1176, Leu1181 and Leu1219. These pockets appear to be optimized for accommodating long hydrophobic side chains.
The ternary IRK3P structure provides a basis for understanding tyrosine kinase substrate specificity. In a study of substrate specificity using a degenerate peptide library, the cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase Fps was shown to have a strong preference for glutamic acid at the P+1 position of a peptide substrate (Songyang et al., 1995). Of the four insulin receptor residues that form the binding pocket for Met(P+1), three are identical or similar in Fps, while the fourth, Leu1219, is an arginine in Fps (Arg770). Modeling suggests that an arginine at the Leu1219 position could make a hydrogen bond with a glutamic acid at the P+1 position of a peptide substrate. In the receptor tyrosine kinase RET, the substitution Met918→Thr leads to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B (Hofstra et al., 1994), and is thought to alter the substrate specificity of RET (Songyang et al., 1995; Pandit et al., 1996). The corresponding methionine in the insulin receptor, Met1176, is a constituent of the Met(P+3) binding pocket.
Substrates of the insulin receptor and other tyrosine kinases often contain one or more acidic residues N‐terminal to the acceptor tyrosine (Hunter, 1982; Stadtmauer and Rosen, 1983; Songyang et al., 1995). The co‐crystallized peptide contains an aspartic acid at the P–1 position. In the crystal structure, Asp(P–1) is not directly hydrogen‐bonded to residues of the kinase, but instead makes a water‐mediated hydrogen bond to Lys1085 (Figure 6B). Two other positively charged residues, Arg1089 and Arg1092, extend from the same face of αD as Lys1085 towards the substrate binding region (Figure 6A). At the position corresponding to Arg1089, a large majority of tyrosine kinases contain a hydrogen‐bond donor which is often positively charged. This residue may play a role in the recognition of protein substrates with acidic residues at the P–3 or P–4 position.
The hydroxyl group of the substrate tyrosine, Tyr(P), is hydrogen‐bonded to the carboxylate group of Asp1132 (Oη…Oδ2 = 2.7 Å), and thus appears to be in position for proton abstraction by Asp1132 (Figures 4B and 5). The hydroxyl group is also hydrogen‐bonded to tyrosine kinase‐conserved Arg1136 in the catalytic loop (Oη…Nϵ = 3.1 Å). The phenolic ring of Tyr(P) is oriented in part by van der Waals interactions with tyrosine kinase‐conserved Pro1172 (P+1 loop), positioned 3.6 Å from the ring (Figures 4B and 6B).
Based on the autoinhibited IRK structure, a difference in the conformation of the P+1 loop near Pro1172 appeared to be a major determinant in conferring specificity for tyrosine versus serine/threonine (Hubbard et al., 1994; Taylor et al., 1995). This is confirmed by the ternary IRK3P structure, in which backbone hydrogen‐bonding between the peptide substrate and the P+1 loop of the kinase governs the distance between the peptide backbone and the kinase active site (Figure 6B); the side chain of tyrosine but not of serine/threonine is long enough to reach the active site.
In the ternary IRK3P structure, the γ‐phosphorus atom of AMP‐PNP is 5.0 Å from the hydroxyl oxygen of Tyr(P) (Figure 5), and is therefore not in position for direct in‐line (associative) phosphotransfer, the catalytic mechanism proposed for cAPK (Madhusudan et al., 1994). The use of AMP‐PNP in co‐crystallizations (to preclude substrate phosphorylation) could introduce a deviation in γ‐phosphate positioning, although no significant differences in nucleotide binding are seen in the structures of cAPK with ATP (Zheng et al., 1993) or with AMP‐PNP (Bossemeyer et al., 1993). The present structure is the first to be reported of a complex between a protein kinase, a peptide substrate, and a γ‐phosphate‐containing nucleotide. Trapping the enzyme with both the non‐transferable γ‐phosphate and acceptor hydroxyl in position for associative phosphotransfer may be inherently difficult. Alternatively, in view of the difference in the pKa values of tyrosine (∼10) and serine/threonine (∼13), and the presence in the catalytic loop of an arginine (tyrosine kinases) rather than a lysine (serine/threonine kinases), the structure may suggest a dissociative or mixed associative–dissociative phosphotransfer mechanism (Bramson et al., 1984) for tyrosine kinases.
The crystal structures of IRK and IRK3P afford an understanding at the molecular level of insulin receptor activation via autophosphorylation. The IRK structure, together with mutagenesis data showing that substitution of Tyr1162 with phenylalanine increases basal level kinase activity (Ellis et al., 1986), suggests that residues of the unphosphorylated A‐loop compete with ATP and protein substrates for binding at the kinase active site. Upon insulin‐triggered trans‐autophosphorylation of the tyrosine residues within the A‐loop, this peptide segment adopts a markedly different conformation which is stabilized by both pTyr and non‐pTyr interactions. For the insulin receptor and presumably other receptor tyrosine kinases, stimulation of kinase activity by autophosphorylation is evidently a consequence of stabilization of an A‐loop conformation that (i) allows unhindered access to ATP and protein substrates, and (ii) facilitates the correct positioning of the residues critical for MgATP binding and catalysis.
The bridging interactions of pTyr1163 with other A‐loop residues and its similar spatial position to pThr197 in cAPK imply that pTyr1163 is the key pTyr in stabilizing the conformation of the tris‐phosphorylated A‐loop. Although studies of Tyr→Phe substitutions in the insulin receptor A‐loop have not demonstrated a predominant role in kinase activation for a particular tyrosine (Tavare and Siddle, 1993), the tyrosine corresponding to Tyr1163 has been shown to be the critical autophosphorylation site in the FGF receptor (Mohammadi et al., 1996a) and in MET (Longati et al., 1994).
Autophosphorylation mapping experiments have indicated that Tyr1163 is the last of the three A‐loop sites to be phosphorylated (Dickens and Tavare, 1992; Wei et al., 1995). This result, together with the mutagenesis data and the structural results presented here, is consistent with a graded activation mechanism in which each autophosphorylation event in the A‐loop leads to partial stabilization of the active configuration of the A‐loop, with full activation achieved only upon autophosphorylation of pTyr1163. Conceivably, in partially activated (mono‐ and bis‐phosphorylated) states, pTyr1158 and pTyr1162 are engaged in a different set of interactions than those observed in the IRK3P structure. For example, pTyr1162 may substitute structurally for pTyr1163 in the bis‐phosphorylated state, though presumably less effectively.
The lack of engagement of pTyr1158 with other kinase residues and the solvent accessibility of the pTyr1162/Arg1164 pair suggests that these pTyr residues could potentially serve as docking sites for downstream signaling proteins. Several recent studies have provided evidence that one or more of the A‐loop pTyr residues are involved in protein–protein interactions. Yeast two‐hybrid experiments have identified an interaction between a region in IRS‐2 and the cytoplasmic domain of the insulin receptor, which is dependent on tyrosine phosphorylation in the A‐loop but not in the juxtamembrane region or C‐terminal tail (He et al., 1996; Sawka‐Verhelle et al., 1996). Other yeast two‐hybrid experiments together with in vitro binding studies have provided evidence for interactions between the cytoplasmic domain and the Src‐homology 2 (SH2) domains of GRB10/IR‐SV1 (O'Neill et al., 1996; Frantz et al., 1997) and SHP‐2 (Kharitonenkov et al., 1995), which are dependent on phosphorylation of one or more of the A‐loop tyrosine residues. The IRK3P structure provides evidence, albeit circumstantial, that one or more pTyr residues of the insulin receptor A‐loop may serve as targets for downstream signaling molecules.
Materials and methods
Expression, purification and crystallization of IRK3P
A recombinant baculovirus was engineered to encode residues 978–1283 of the human insulin receptor with the inclusion of two amino acid substitutions: Cys981→Ala and Tyr984→Phe (Wei et al., 1995). Expression and purification of IRK have been described previously (Hubbard et al., 1994). Typically, IRK3P was produced by adding ATP and MgCl2 (10 mM and 25 mM final, respectively) to IRK (∼1 mg/ml final) at 4°C. After 20–30 min, the autophosphorylation reaction was terminated by the addition of EDTA (50 mM final). The reaction mixture was passed over a Superdex 75 (Pharmacia) gel filtration column to remove nucleotides, Mg2+ and EDTA. The mainly tris‐phosphorylated kinase species was separated from the bis‐phosphorylated species by Mono Q (Pharmacia) ion exchange chromatography. Purified IRK3P was concentrated to 10–15 mg/ml using a Centricon‐10 (Amicon) in 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl and 200 μM Na3VO4. Solid‐phase synthesis of the 18‐residue peptide substrate was performed on an Applied Biosystems model 741A synthesizer using Fmoc chemistry, and AMP‐PNP was purchased from Boehringer‐Mannheim.
Crystals were grown at 4°C by vapor diffusion in hanging drops containing 2.0 μl of protein solution (10 mg/ml IRK3P, 2 mM AMP‐PNP, 6 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 mM peptide substrate) and 2.0 μl of reservoir solution [22% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000, 100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, and 2% ethylene glycol]. The crystals belong to trigonal space group P3221 and have unit cell dimensions of a = b = 66.5 Å, c = 139.1 Å when frozen. There is one molecule in the asymmetric unit and the solvent content is 50% (assuming a partial specific volume of 0.74 cm3/g).
Data collection, structure determination and analysis
One cryo‐cooled crystal was used for data collection. The crystal was transferred into a cryo‐protectant containing 25% PEG 8000, 1 mM AMP‐PNP, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM peptide substrate, 100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5 and 15% ethylene glycol. After ∼1 min in the cryo‐protectant, the crystal was flash‐cooled in liquid nitrogen and then transferred to the goniostat, which was bathed in a dry nitrogen stream at −160°C. Data were collected at beamline X4A at the National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven National Laboratory, on Fuji image plates and digitized with a Fuji scanner. All data were processed using DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski, 1993).
A molecular replacement solution was found with a search molecule consisting of IRK residues 981–1283, excluding 1149–1170 (A‐loop), for which the N‐terminal lobe (residues 981–1081) was rotated and translated as a rigid body so that the relative orientation of the N‐ and C‐terminal lobes was similar to that in closed‐form cAPK (Zheng et al., 1993). An initial 3.0 Å data set collected on a Rigaku R‐AXIS IIC image plate detector was used for molecular replacement (data not shown). With AMoRe (Navaza, 1994), using 80% of the structure factor amplitudes between 15.0 and 3.5 Å, the correlation coefficient for the correct solution in space group P3221 was 0.46 versus 0.34 for the highest incorrect solution in the enantiomeric space group P3121. The AMoRe solution was refined in X‐PLOR (Brünger, 1992), first as one rigid‐body unit, then as two units each comprising a lobe of the kinase (981–1081, 1082–1283), resulting in a relative rotation of the two lobes of ∼13° and an increase of the correlation coefficient from 0.33 to 0.41 (10.0–3.4 Å, F>2σ). Simulated annealing and conjugate‐gradient minimization were performed using X‐PLOR, and model building was performed using TOM/FRODO (Jones, 1985).
The average atomic B‐factors are 18.5 Å2 for protein, 15.8 Å2 for MgAMP‐PNP, 21.9 Å2 for peptide and 25.3 Å2 for water molecules. Due to poor supporting electron density, residues 978–980 are not included in the atomic model, nor are the side chains indicated in Figure 3. Atomic superpositions were performed with TOSS (Hendrickson, 1979). Per residue solvent accessible surface calculations were done with X‐PLOR with a probe radius of 1.4 Å. As defined in PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1993), the backbone torsion angles of the protein lie either in most favored regions (93%) or in additional allowed regions (7%).
I thank W.Hendrickson, in whose laboratory this work was initiated, for his support and encouragement; L.Ellis and L.Wei for the recombinant IRK baculovirus and discussions; M.Mohammadi, S.Li, E.Stein and C.Ogata for assistance in synchrotron data collection; M.Mohammadi and H.Yamaguchi for discussions; J.Schlessinger and W.Hendrickson for manuscript comments; R.Beavis for mass spectrometry; M.Jani for technical support; J.Weider for graphics support, and H.Yamaguchi and W.Hendrickson for the LCK coordinates. Equipment in the structural biology program at the Skirball Institute is partially supported by a grant from the Kresge Foundation. Beamline X4A at the National Synchrotron Light Source, a DOE facility, is supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Coordinates will be deposited in the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank. Correspondence and request for coordinates may be sent to.
- Copyright © 1997 European Molecular Biology Organization