Mex67p, a novel factor for nuclear mRNA export, binds to both poly(A)+ RNA and nuclear pores

Alexandra Segref, Kishore Sharma, Valérie Doye, Andrea Hellwig, Jochen Huber, Reinhard Lührmann, Ed Hurt

Author Affiliations

  1. Alexandra Segref1,
  2. Kishore Sharma2,
  3. Valérie Doye3,
  4. Andrea Hellwig1,
  5. Jochen Huber4,
  6. Reinhard Lührmann4 and
  7. Ed Hurt1
  1. 1 University of Heidelberg, BZH, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, D‐69120, Heidelberg, Germany
  2. 2 EMBL, Meyerhofstrasse 1, D‐69117, Heidelberg, Germany
  3. 3 Institut Curie, Section de recherche, CNRS UMR144, 2 rue Lhomond, F‐75231, Paris Cedex 05, France
  4. 4 Institut für Molekularbiologie und Tumorforschung, Philipps‐Universität Marburg, Emil‐Mannkopf‐Strasse 2, D‐35037, Marburg, Germany


An essential cellular factor for nuclear mRNA export called Mex67p which has homologous proteins in human and Caenorhabditis elegans was identified through its genetic interaction with nucleoporin Nup85p. In the thermosensitive mex67‐5 mutant, poly(A)+ RNA accumulates in intranuclear foci shortly after shift to the restrictive temperature, but NLS‐mediated nuclear protein import is not inhibited. In vivo, Mex67p tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) is found at the nuclear pores, but mutant mex67‐5–GFP accumulates in the cytoplasm. Upon purification of poly(A)+ RNA derived from of UV‐irradiated yeast cells, Mex67p, but not nucleoporins Nup85p and Nup57p, was crosslinked to mRNA. In a two‐hybrid screen, a putative RNA‐binding protein with RNP consensus motifs was found to interact with the Mex67p carboxy‐terminal domain. Thus, Mex67p is likely to participate directly in the export of mRNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm.


The translocation of molecules across the nuclear membrane occurs through the nuclear pore complexes (Fabre and Hurt, 1994; Görlich and Mattaj, 1996). Different transport routes were identified in the past and a picture is emerging that different transport cargoes use different transport vehicles (Gerace, 1995). For nuclear protein import, the nuclear localization sequence (NLS)–receptor complex consisting of importin/karyopherin α and β subunits binds to the NLS of karyophilic proteins in the cytoplasm (Görlich and Mattaj, 1996), followed by a docking step at the nuclear pore complexes, most likely at FXFG or GLFG repeat sequence containing nucleoporins (Rexach and Blobel, 1995). The translocation of the nuclear protein through the nuclear pore channel is then initiated by GTP hydrolysis, mediated by the small GTPase Ran/TC4 (Moore and Blobel, 1993).

RNA export from the nucleus into the cytoplasm is also a signal‐ and receptor‐mediated process (Görlich and Mattaj, 1996). Some of the players participating in the molecular events during RNA export have been recently identified; however, the underlying mechanisms of RNA export remain largely unknown. A cap‐binding complex (CBP) which recognizes the monomethylated 5′‐end of snRNAs and mRNAs has been shown to mediate U snRNA nuclear export (Izaurralde et al., 1995). Similar to the NLS found in karyophilic proteins, nuclear export sequences (NESs) were recently found in several proteins which shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (Gerace, 1995). In most cases, these NES‐containing proteins are RNA‐binding proteins and thus could be involved in the nuclear export of their cognate cargo RNA. This was most convincingly shown for the HIV Rev protein which associates with viral mRNA (Fischer et al., 1994; Bogerd et al., 1995; Stutz et al., 1995) and the hnRNP A1 protein which is bound to mRNA (Michael et al., 1995). HIV Rev transports unspliced and partially spliced viral mRNA from the nucleus into the cytoplasm, and it is the NES of Rev which retargets viral mRNA directly to a cellular export pathway bypassing the splicing machinery (Fischer et al., 1995). Whereas the NES in HIV Rev, PKI (protein kinase inhibitor) and TFIIIA is short (∼10 amino acids in length) and leucine‐rich with a typical spacing of the hydrophobic residues (Gerace, 1995), the NES of hnRNP A1 (called M9) is significantly longer and does not conform to this consensus (Michael et al., 1995). Interestingly, the M9 sequence also exhibits NLS activity and was recently shown to interact with a novel import receptor called transportin, which is an importin/karyopherin β homologue (Pollard et al., 1996). Since NESs can induce rapid export of attached passenger proteins (Fischer et al., 1995), a search was undertaken for cellular receptors interacting with the nuclear export signal. By using the yeast two‐hybrid system, two related proteins from human and yeast (called hRip and Rip1p, respectively), were identified which specifically interact with the HIV Rev NES (Bogerd et al., 1995; Fritz et al., 1995; Stutz et al., 1995). Interestingly, these Rip proteins share similarity to FG repeat‐containing nucleoporins which are also candidates for NES receptors that could facilitate transport of Rev‐associated RNPs through the NPC (Stutz et al., 1996). Interestingly, yeast Rip1p is not essential for cell growth, suggesting that additional NES receptors must exist in the cell which are essentially involved in RNA export reactions or have overlapping function. Recently, an essential RNA‐export mediator called Gle1p which contains a nuclear export signal and interacts with Rip1p and Nup100p has been identified in yeast (Murphy and Wente, 1996). Gle1p is identical to Rss1p (Del Priore et al., 1996) and Brr3p (Noble and Guthrie, 1996) which have been recently found in other genetic screens.

A complementary approach has been undertaken in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, exploiting its powerful genetics, to dissect the nucleocytoplasmic transport machinery (for review, see Doye and Hurt, 1995). In a genetic screen, a collection of temperature‐sensitive mutants was analysed by in situ hybridization for nuclear accumulation of poly(A)+ RNA. Many of the obtained mutants, called rat (mRNA trafficking) and mtr (mRNA transport) mutants (Amberg et al., 1992; Kadowaki et al., 1992), were blocked in nuclear mRNA export. Among the cloned RAT and MTR genes, some of them encode nuclear pore proteins (Doye et al., 1994; Heath et al., 1995; Li et al., 1995). In particular, RAT7/NUP159 (Gorsch et al., 1995) and MTR2 (Kadowaki et al., 1994) are promising candidates for a direct involvement in mRNA export reactions, since thermosensitive mutants show an intranuclear mRNA accumulation shortly after shift to the restrictive temperature. The yeast homologue of RCC1 (the guanine dinucleotide exchanger of Ran) has also been found in such a genetic screen, suggesting that Ran is involved in nuclear RNA export (Kadowaki et al., 1993); similarly, mammalian RCC1 was shown to be required for nuclear RNA export (Cheng et al., 1995). Furthermore, hnRNP proteins in yeast such as Npl3p, which shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, were also suggested to mediate mRNA export (Lee et al., 1996).

Genetic screens in yeast based on synthetic lethality have proven to be extremely useful in identifying a vast number of nuclear pore complex proteins with roles in nuclear pore biogenesis, nuclear pore structure and/or nucleocytoplasmic transport (Doye and Hurt, 1995). Among the many nucleoporins identified so far, some appear to have distinct roles in nuclear protein import, mRNA export and tRNA export, respectively (Simos et al., 1996). Other nucleoporin mutants not only have defects in nucleocytoplasmic transport reactions, but possess exhibit structural abnormalities of the nuclear envelope and NPCs (Doye and Hurt, 1995), making it difficult to assign the primary defect. Furthermore, in many of these nucleoporin mutants the manifestation of transport defects was not immediate after shifting cells to the restrictive condition, making it likely that observed transport defects could be pleiotropic.

Recently, a novel nucleoporin complex consisting of Nup120p, Nup85p, Nup84p, band IV, Sec13p and a Sec13 homologue (Seh1p) was identified in yeast and plays roles in coordinated nuclear membrane/NPC biogenesis and in nuclear export of mRNA and tRNA (Siniossoglou et al., 1996). We used a mutant of one member of this complex, Nup85p, which exhibits a poly(A)+ RNA export defect, to search for novel factors involved in nuclear mRNA export. Here, we report the identification of such a component, called Mex67p, which is essential for mRNA transport out of the nucleus. Our studies indicate that Mex67p is likely to be involved in nuclear mRNA export mechanisms.


A synthetic lethal screen with a mutant allele of NUP85 identifies the essential mRNA export factor Mex67p

A nucleoporin complex of six proteins which includes Nup85p is required for nuclear pore biogenesis and RNA export (Siniossoglou et al., 1996). Interestingly, a nup85 null mutant is impaired in both NPC organization and RNA export, whereas cells which express an amino‐terminally truncated Nup85p (nup85Δ) and are thermosensitive for growth at 37°C are mainly defective in poly(A)+ RNA export (Siniossoglou et al., 1996). This observation prompted us to perform a synthetic lethal (sl) screen with the nup85Δ allele to identify novel components of the mRNA export machinery (see Materials and methods). In total, 13 sl mutants were isolated which are synthetically lethal with nup85Δ, but not with NUP85. The wild‐type gene of a NUP85 interacting component was cloned by complementation of one of these sl mutants (sl102) with a yeast genomic library. The complementing activity was restricted to an uncharacterized yeast gene on chromosome XVI, which encodes a putative protein of 599 amino acids (Figure 1A). The deduced molecular weight of this novel protein is 67.351 kDa. Since this protein plays an essential role in mRNA export (see also later), it was named Mex67p and its gene MEX67 (for Messenger RNA EXport factor of 67 kDa molecular weight). A search in protein sequence data libraries for putative higher eukaryotic homologues of yeast Mex67p (accession No. Z73525) revealed three sequences with significant homology and a similar domain organization (Figure 1A and B); one is a human protein called TAP (accession No. D42085) and the other two are uncharacterized ORFs from C.elegans (accession Nos: C15H11.e/e275614; C15H11.d/e275615).

Figure 1.Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Structural organization and homology of Mex67p. (A) Domain organization and primary amino acid sequence of Mex67p and a homologous human protein called TAP (accession No. U80073). The various domains are highlighted with different colours including a Leucine‐Rich Repeat (LRR)‐domain (red), an uncharged proline/glutamine/glycine‐rich sequence (orange) and the carboxy‐terminal domain (blue). The LRR domain was aligned in a way that the four LRRs become evident. Conserved residues in the LRRs are at position 2, 5, 7, 10 and 12 and shown in black. LRRs occur in several other proteins including the ribonuclease inhibitor whose crystal structure has been recently solved. It was speculated that the LRR is involved in protein–protein interactions (Kobe and Deisenhofer, 1994). Within the Mex67p carboxy‐terminal domain, a short sequence is underlined, which resembles the HIV Rev NES. The point mutation H(400) to Y in ts mex67‐5 is indicated by a star. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of Mex67p with human TAP (accession No. U80073), and two C.elegans ORFs (C15H11.e/e275614; C15H11.d/e275615) using ClustalW1.6 (BCM Search Launcher).

Disruption of the MEX67 gene showed that it is essential for cell growth (data not shown). In order to study the in vivo role of Mex67p, thermosensitive mutants were generated by random mutagenesis of the isolated MEX67 gene. Among the three thermosensitive mutants obtained, ts mex67‐5 was chosen for further analysis, because it showed no apparent growth defect at 30°C, but completely stopped cell growth shortly after shifting the cells to 37°C (Figure 2A and B). This suggests that an essential cellular process is tightly controlled by Mex67p. Interestingly, ts mex67‐5 cells only arrest, but do not die at 37°C, which can be observed by the reversibility of the ts phenotype. Even after prolonged incubation of ts mex67‐5 cells at 37°C (e.g. 12 h), >50% of the cells are viable and can regrow if brought back to 30°C (Figure 2C). Thus, mex67‐5 is a thermoreversible ts allele. The mutation causing the ts phenotype in mex67‐5 is due to a single amino acid exchange, His400 to Tyr400 (Figure 1A).

Figure 2.

A reversible temperature‐sensitive mutant of Mex67p. (A) Growth of mutant mex67‐5 and wild‐type MEX67 cells at different temperatures. Precultures were diluted in liquid YPD medium and equivalent amounts of cells (undiluted or 1/10 diluted) were spotted onto YPD plates. Plates were incubated for 3 days at 23°C and 30°C, and for 3 days at 37°C. (B) Growth curves of wild‐type MEX67 and temperature‐sensitive mex67‐5 strains in YPD liquid medium at 30°C or 37°C. Cell growth was followed by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600). (C) Cell viability of mex67‐5 cells incubated at the restrictive condition. For each time point, the same number of mex67‐5 cells (∼1000 per plate) were plated on a YPD‐plate. Plates were incubated at 37°C for the indicated time points, before being brought back to 30°C. The number of colonies which formed after 3 days at 30°C were determined.

MEX67 was isolated on the basis of synthetic lethality with the mutated nup85Δ gene. When strain sl102 was transformed with plasmid‐borne MEX67 alleles, synthetic lethality was only complemented at 30°C by intact MEX67, but not mex67‐5 (data not shown). Furthermore, a haploid yeast strain was constructed in which the nup85Δ and the ts mex67‐5 allele were combined, but this strain was not viable when the pURA3–MEX67 plasmid was shuffled out on 5‐fluoro‐orotic acid (FOA) plates (data not shown). This demonstrates synthetic lethality between the two mutant alleles. When we analysed whether MEX67 is also linked to other members of the Nup85p complex or to other nucleoporins, no synthetic lethality was seen below 30°C between mex67‐5 and mutant alleles of nup84, seh1 and pom152 (see Materials and methods). However, the combination of mex67‐5 and nup84::HIS caused synthetic lethality at 33°C, a temperature at which the single mutants are still able to grow (data not shown). This genetic analysis thus revealed a strong genetic overlap between MEX67 and NUP85, and a weaker or no genetic interaction with mutant alleles of NUP84, SEH1 and POM152, respectively.

Since MEX67 was found in conjunction with the nup85Δ mutant allele which causes poly(A)+ RNA to accumulate inside the nucleus, we tested whether Mex67p on its own participates in mRNA export. By in situ hybridization using a FITC‐labelled oligonucleotide poly(dT)50 probe, poly(A)+ RNA was localized in the cytoplasm of mex67‐5 cells if grown at the permissive temperature (Figure 3A). After shifting the cells for 15–30 min to 37°C, however, poly(A)+ RNA strongly accumulated inside the nucleus in almost all of the mex67‐5 cells (Figure 3A). Strikingly, this intranuclear RNA was concentrated in several discrete spots which varied in number (Figure 3A and B). Concomitantly, the nucleolar marker Nop1p was also changed in its distribution in the ts mex67‐5 mutant, becoming clustered in several intranuclear spots (Figure 3B). Disintegration of the nucleolus was frequently observed in nucleoporin mutants including nup85 (Goldstein et al., 1996) and nup120 mutants (Aitchison et al., 1995b; Heath et al., 1995). However, the spots containing Nop1p did not co‐localize with the accumulated poly(A)+ RNA (Figure 3B), as opposed to two other mRNA export mutants, in which nucleolar antigens and mRNA co‐localize inside the nucleus (Kadowaki et al., 1994). In contrast, the distribution of nuclear pore antigens was normal in mex67‐5 cells with no tendency of NPC clustering (see also later). It thus appears that, in ts mex67‐5 cells, polyadenylated RNA accumulates in discrete intranuclear foci which are not in close contact with the nuclear pore complexes. To determine whether the mex67‐5 mutant exhibits morphological abnormalities of the nuclear envelope at the ultrastructural level, thin‐section electron microscopy was performed. In ts mex67‐5 cells shifted to 37°C, nuclear envelope and NPC morphology, as well as NPC number appeared normal, as judged from the inspection of electron micrographs (Figure 4); however, numerous electron‐dense aggregates were seen in the ts mex67‐5 mutant incubated at the restrictive temperature (Figure 4, arrows; see also Discussion). In addition, fragmentation of the nucleolus, which can be easily identified because of its typical fibrillar‐like appearance, was also visible by electron microscopy (Figure 4, arrowheads).

Figure 3.Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Analysis of nuclear RNA export of nuclear protein import in mex67‐5 cells. (A) Accumulation of polyadenylated RNA in the nucleus of ts mex67 cells. Subcellular localization of poly(A)+ RNA was analysed by in situ hybridization with a FITC‐labelled oligonucleotide poly(dT) probe. Ts mex67‐5 cells were either grown at 30°C or shifted for 30 min to 37°C in YPD‐medium. Nuclear DNA was stained by Hoechst 33258 and cells were viewed by Nomarski optics. (B) The fragmented nucleolus does not co‐localize with accumulated polyadenylated RNA in ts mex67‐5 cells. Thermosensitive mex67 cells were shifted for 30 min to 37°C before cells were fixed and processed for both, in situ hybridization with oligo(dT)‐FITC [poly(A)+ RNA] and indirect immunofluorescence using anti‐Nop1p antibodies (Nop1p). Both pictures which were obtained from the confocal microscope were merged [poly(A)+ RNA + Nop1p], indicating that poly(A)+ and Nop1p‐clusters generally do not co‐localize. (C) Analysis of nuclear protein import in ts mex67‐5 cells. Intracellular location of the NLS–GFP reporter protein in ts mex67 and MEX67 cells as revealed by fluorescence microscopy. Cells were preincubated for 1 h at 37°C before the in vivo nuclear import analysis was performed essentially after Shulga et al. (1996). − energy: indicates that cells were treated with azide and deoxyglucose. + energy (10′) and + energy (20′), cells after recovery from the drug treatment in glucose‐containing medium for 10 and 20 min, respectively. Note that nuclear re‐import of GFP–NLS which leaked out into the cytoplasm in energy‐depleted cells, is almost complete after 10 min of re‐energization, both in mex67‐5 and MEX67+ cells.

Figure 4.

Electron microscopic analysis of ts mex67‐5 cells. Wild‐type MEX67 and ts mex67‐5 cells were grown to the early logarithmic phase at 30°C or 37°C before processing them for thin‐section electron microscopic analysis as described under Materials and methods. (a) Wild‐type MEX67 cells grown for 2 h at 37°C; (b) ts mex67‐5 cells, grown at 30°C; (c and d) ts mex67‐5 cells grown for 2 h at 37°C. Small arrows point to nuclear pores, large arrows to electron‐dense intranuclear aggregates, which most likely are hRNP clusters, and arrowheads to the fragmented nucleolus. Bar, 0.2 μm.

It was further tested whether the biogenesis of other RNA species is altered in ts mex67‐5 cells. When rRNA processing was analysed by Northern analysis (Tollervey et al., 1993), no significant impairment of pre‐rRNA processing was seen in ts mex67‐5 cells after a 30 min shift to 37°C; however after prolonged incubation (e.g. 1 h) at 37°C, a decrease of the 32S and 27SA2 pre‐rRNA species, and the simultaneous appearance of the 23S precursor, was noticed. Processing of 20S to mature 18S rRNA, however, was not affected (data not shown). Accordingly, pre‐rRNA processing occurs at 37°C in the mex67‐5 mutant, but a delay in the cleavage at site A0, A1 and A2 can be measured at later time points of restrictive incubation. Processing and transport of tRNA was normal, since no defect in tRNA splicing and no loss of suppressor tRNA activity was observed in the mex67‐5 mutant (data not shown). Finally, mRNA splicing was also not inhibited in the mex67‐5 mutant when shifted to 37°C, as seen by the fact that no intron‐containing actin mRNA was found (data not shown).

To determine whether nuclear protein import is inhibited in ts mex67‐5 cells, we tested the nuclear import of the karyophilic reporter protein Matα2–lacZ (Nehrbass et al., 1993); however, no cytoplasmic accumulation was found at the restrictive temperature (data not shown). Since poly(A)+ RNA export is efficiently inhibited in ts mex67‐5 cells, one can not exclude that the nuclear reporter protein is no longer synthesized at the restrictive temperature due to the cytoplasmic depletion of reporter mRNA. Therefore, we used a recently developed assay for in vivo nuclear protein import which does not depend on ongoing mRNA synthesis and export (Shulga et al., 1996). In this assay, cells which express and accumulate a NLS–GFP reporter protein inside the nucleus are first poisoned with inhibitors of energy metabolism. This causes leakage of NLS–GFP into the cytoplasm. After washing and resuspending the cells in glucose‐containing medium, normal ATP levels are restored, allowing rapid nuclear re‐import of NLS–GFP. When the ts mex67‐5 mutant expressing NLS–GFP was shifted for 1 h to 37°C and then analysed according to this assay, no defect in nuclear re‐import of the NLS–GFP reporter protein was seen as compared with wild‐type cells (Figure 3C). In summary, the early onset of an mRNA export defect in ts mex67‐5 mutant cells with no apparent impairment in NLS‐mediated nuclear protein import suggests that Mex67p is directly involved in nuclear mRNA export reactions.

Mex67p is a nuclear pore‐associated protein which accumulates in the cytoplasm in ts mex67 cells

The functional interaction of Mex67p with nucleoporins and its essential role in nuclear mRNA export suggests that the protein might be localized at the nuclear pores. Therefore, Mex67p was tagged at its carboxy‐terminal end with different epitopes derived from Protein A or the Green Fluorescent Protein (see Materials and methods). These fusion proteins were functional since they could complement the lethal phenotype of the mex67 null mutant if expressed from yeast single‐copy plasmids (data not shown). Mex67p–ProtA showed a punctuate nuclear envelope staining in wild‐type cells and co‐clustering with nuclear pore antigens in nup133 cells (data not shown). Also, the in vivo location of GFP‐tagged Mex67p was predominantly at the nuclear pores, as seen by the ring‐like and punctuate staining of the nuclear envelope (Figure 5A). This staining closely resembles the in vivo labelling seen with a bona fide nucleoporin, NUP49–GFP (Belgareh and Doye, 1997). Finally, the fluorescence signals from Mex67–GFP and Nsp1p largely overlapped, as revealed by double immunofluorescence microscopy (data not shown). Thus, under steady‐state conditions, Mex67p shows a preferential location at the nuclear pores.

Figure 5.

Localization of GFP‐tagged Mex67p in living cells. (A) Confocal fluorescence microscopy of living MEX67–GFP cells. Two successive sections, each 0.5 μm thick, are shown for MEX67–GFP, and for comparison, NUP49–GFP cells. The insert shows a higher magnification of MEX67–GFP cells which reveals a typical nuclear pore labelling, with little staining in the nucleoplasm and cytoplasm, and no staining inside the vacuole. (B) Confocal fluorescence microscopy of thermosensitive mex67‐5–GFP cells. Living cells growing for the indicated time periods and temperatures in liquid medium were inspected in the confocal fluorescence microscope. The same mex67‐5–GFP cells which were immobilized on the microscopic slide, were viewed and photographed twice, once after 10 min shift to 37°C and a second time after a 20 min reshift to 23°C. For control reasons, also MEX67–GFP cells were grown for 15 min at 37°C.

A different intracellular location was seen when the mutant protein mex67‐5p tagged with GFP was analysed by fluorescence microscopy; mex67‐5–GFP complemented the lethal phenotype of the mex67 null disruption mutant at permissive temperatures, but cells were thermosensitive for growth at 37°C (data not shown). When cells were grown at 23°C, mex67‐5–GFP was found predominantly at the nuclear envelope; however, this location changed when cells were shifted for as little as 5–10 min to 37°C (Figure 5B). The mex67‐5–GFP fusion protein was no longer associated with the nuclear envelope, but detached from the nuclear pores and appeared in many dot‐like structures scattered throughout the cytoplasm. When the mutant was reshifted to 23°C, the cytoplasmic clusters disappeared and the nuclear envelope staining often resumed. Wild‐type Mex67–GFP did not show this behaviour and was always found at the NPCs, even at 37°C (Figure 5B). To determine whether the cytoplasmic localization of ts mex67‐5–GFP seen at 37°C is due to a general dissociation of nucleoporins from the nuclear pores, double indirect immunofluorescence of fixed and spheroplasted ts mex67‐5–GFP cells was performed using anti‐nucleoporin antibodies. Thermosensitive mex67‐5–GFP accumulated in dot‐like cytoplasmic structures, whereas nucleoporins recognized by the monoclonal antibody Mab414 remained associated with the NPCs (data not shown). We next tested whether ProtA–Nup85p becomes mislocalized in ts mex67‐5 cells shifted for 1 h to 37°C, but again this nucleoporin remained exclusively bound at the NPCs. Finally, Mex67p–GFP was strictly found at the nuclear pores in nup85Δ mutant cells, shifted for 2 h to the restrictive temperature (data not shown). Taken together, these data show that mutated mex67‐5–GFP, but not other nucleoporins, dissociates from the nuclear pores into the cytoplasm under restrictive conditions and is retargeted to the nuclear envelope when shifted to permissive temperature.

A short sequence in the carboxy‐terminal domain is essential for in vivo function of Mex67p

The sequence 549LELLNKLHL557 in the carboxy‐terminal domain of Mex67p resembles the NES of HIV Rev (Figure 6A; see also Figure 1A). We therefore coupled this NES‐resembling peptide (CLELLNKLHL) and a mutant form (CLELPNKLHL; see also later) to 125I‐labelled bovine serum albumin (BSA) and microinjected the conjugates into Xenopus oocyte nuclei. The NES‐mediated export was then followed by: (i) determining the amount of Mex67p NES–BSA in the nucleus and cytoplasm; and (ii) measuring competition of Rev‐mediated RNA export in the presence of Mex67p NES–peptides coupled to BSA. The NES‐like sequence of Mex67p, but not its mutant form, exhibits a nuclear export activity in the Xenopus oocyte system which is comparable in its efficiency to the activity of the Rev NES (Figure 7A). Furthermore, the Rev‐mediated export of pAd46 RNA, harbouring the Rev‐responsive element (RRE), and export of U1ΔSm RNA were also competitively inhibited by intact, but not mutated Mex67p NES–BSA (Figure 7B). This showed that the NES‐like sequence of Mex67p exhibits a nuclear export activity in the Xenopus oocyte system, but it is uncertain whether this sequence also has NES‐activity in the context of the native Mex67p protein (see also Discussion).

Figure 6.

Mutational analysis of a short essential sequence in the Mex67p carboxy‐terminal domain. (A) Comparison of HIV Rev NES with a short sequence in the Mex67p carboxy‐terminal domain. The conserved leucine residues at position 1, 4, 7 and 9 within the nine amino acid‐long NES and flanking residues are shown. Three mutations in the corresponding Mex67p sequence are shown in bold. (B) Left panel: strain MEX67 shuffle (mex67::HIS3/pURA3–MEX67) was transformed with pTRP1–mex67 [L→E] (1), pTRP1–mex67–D544‐559 (2), pLEU2–MEX67 (3) and pTRP1–mex67 [L→P] (4). Transformants were streaked on a 5‐FOA plate and further incubated at 23°C. The plate was grown for 5 days before the picture was taken. Right panel: growth of mex67 [L→E] and MEX67 cells at 37°C was analysed on YPD‐plates. (C) In vivo location of mex67–GFP proteins with mutations in the NES‐like motif. Fluorescence microscopy was performed with strains MEX67–GFP, mex67‐5–GFP, mex67 [L→E]–GFP and mex67 [LL→EE]–GFP, incubated for 1 h at 30°C. Pictures were taken with a Xillix Microimager CCD camera and exposure times and recording parameters were identical in all cases.

Figure 7.

Mex67p contains a short sequence which exhibits NES‐activity in the Xenopus oocyte system. (A) The NES motif of Mex67p targets BSA to the cytoplasm in Xenopus laevis oocytes. 125I‐labelled BSA‐R (lanes 1 and 2; R is the Rev NES coupled to BSA), BSA‐M67* (lanes 3 and 4; M67* is the Mex67p mutant NES peptide coupled to BSA: BSA‐CLELPNKLHL), or BSA‐M67 (lanes 5 and 6; M67 is the wild‐type Mex67p NES peptide coupled to BSA: BSA‐CLELLNKLHL) (0.25 mg/ml each) were injected into the nucleus of oocytes alone, or BSA‐M67 was injected with a 40‐fold molar excess of unlabelled BSA‐R (lanes 7 and 8). The nuclear export was analysed 60 min later by protein extraction from nuclear (N) and cytoplasmic (C) fractions and analysis on SDS–polyacrylamide gels. (B) Saturation of the Rev‐mediated RNA export by BSA‐M67. A mixture of 32P‐labelled in vitro transcribed pAd46 RNA, U1ΔSm RNA (both m7G‐capped), U6 snRNA (to monitor nuclear injection) and tRNA was injected into the nucleus of Xenopus laevis oocytes along with a 20‐fold molar excess of Rev protein either with water (lanes 1–3), BSA‐R (lanes 4–6), BSA‐M67 (lanes 7–9), or BSA‐M67* (lanes 10–12) at concentrations of 10 mg/ml. After the oocytes have been incubated for 90 min at 20°C, the nuclear export was analysed by extracting the RNAs from the nuclear (N), cytoplasmic (C) or both compartments (T) and separation on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The injected RNA was detected by autoradiography.

To find out about the in vivo role of this short sequence, it was deleted from Mex67p; however, yeast cells were not viable (Figure 6B, left panel). Therefore, more subtle mutations were made (Figure 6A). Whereas the L(552)→E mutation only partially impairs the in vivo function of Mex67p (i.e. yeast cells grow more slowly, particularly at 37°C as compared with wild‐type cells; see also Figure 6B, right panel), the L(552)→P mutation no longer allows cell growth at any temperature (Figure 6B, left panel). Thus, single amino acid exchanges in this short sequence can impair the in vivo function of Mex67p. Furthermore, RNA export was inhibited in these mutant cells (data not shown).

To test whether the mutations in the NES‐like sequence affect the intracellular location, the Mex67p [L→E] construct and another mutant, Mex67p [LL→EE] (see also Figure 6A) were GFP‐tagged and expressed in the mex67 null mutant. Also the Mex67p [LL→EE]–GFP construct is functional at permissive temperatures (e.g. at 30°C), but cells grow more slowly as compared with Mex67p [L→E]–GFP cells (data not shown). In the fluorescence microscope, these two GFP‐tagged mutant proteins no longer revealed a distinct nuclear envelope staining but, instead, an increased cytoplasmic labelling. Moreover, an intranuclear accumulation of Mex67p could also be seen in a few cells (Figure 6C). In contrast, wild‐type Mex67–GFP and ts mex67‐5–GFP were seen predominantly at the nuclear envelope under these conditions (Figure 6C). Strikingly, Mex67p [L→E]–GFP and Mex67p [LL→EE]–GFP cells exhibit a significantly increased cell size (Figure 6C).

Mex67p binds to poly(A)+ RNA

Since Mex67p participates in RNA export, we tested whether Mex67p is physically associated with poly(A)+ RNA. Since this interaction could be transient and only a minor pool of mRNA may be associated with Mex67p under steady‐state conditions (>90% of polyadenylated RNA is found in the cytoplasm; Anderson et al., 1993), yeast cells were UV‐irradiated before cell lysis to crosslink bound proteins to RNA prior to purification of polyadenylated RNA. Using this method it has been previously shown that several hnRNP proteins, including Nab1/Npl3/Nop3p, can be photo‐crosslinked to poly(A)+ RNA (Anderson et al., 1993; Russell and Tollervey, 1995). When polyadenylated RNA was isolated by oligo(dT)‐cellulose chromatography and tested for the presence of Mex67p by Western analysis, Mex67p was clearly UV‐crosslinked to poly(A)+ RNA (Figure 8, +UV light). However, the Mex67p band was completely absent from purified poly(A)+ RNA when isolated under the identical conditions from cells which have not been subjected to UV irradiation (Figure 8, −UV light). Similar results were also obtained with the hnRNP protein Nab1p/Npl3p (Figure 8; see also Anderson et al., 1993). On the contrary, the Nop1p band, which served as a well‐known negative control (Russell and Tollervey, 1995), was entirely absent from polyadenylated RNA (Figure 8). Finally, when probed for other nucleoporins such as Nup85p and Nup57p, no UV‐induced crosslink to poly(A)+ RNA was observed (Figure 8). This shows that Mex67p, in contrast to other tested nucleoporins, is associated with polyadenylated RNA.

Figure 8.

Mex67p is crosslinked to polyadenylated RNA by UV light. Immunoblot analysis of proteins, which were UV‐crosslinked to polyadenylated RNA. Affinity‐purified antibodies against Mex67p and Nup85p, and immune sera against Nop1p, Npl3p (Nab1p) and the carboxy‐terminal domain of Nup57p were used for the Western blot. 1, Flow‐through of a whole cell extract from strain BJ926 which passed over an oligo(dT)‐cellulose column; 2, second flow through derived from the prebound first oligo(dT)‐cellulose eluate (see Materials and methods); 3, purified poly(A)+ RNA‐associated proteins derived from UV‐irradiated and not UV‐irradiated BJ926 cells, respectively. Only the relevant area of the immunoblot is shown.

Two‐hybrid interaction between Mex67p and a putative RNA‐binding protein

In an attempt to identify proteins which interact with Mex67p, a two‐hybrid screen was performed. Different Mex67p baits were constructed. Whereas the full‐length Mex67p fused to the Gal4p binding domain was expressed at very low levels in the screening strain (data not shown), a construct called pAS2–MEX67 (II) which contained part of the P/Q/G domain plus the entire carboxy‐terminal domain (from residue 528–599; see also Figures 1A and 9A) yielded good bait expression and therefore was used in a two‐hybrid screen with a yeast genomic library. Among the 1.5×106 screened colonies, two Mips (Mex67‐interacting protein) were obtained. One clone, MIP6, which encodes a putative RNA‐binding protein, showed a strong two‐hybrid interaction with Mex67p as seen by the formation of blue lacZ+ colonies (Figure 9A, left panel); however, when Los1p (Simos et al., 1996) fused to the Gal4p DNA‐binding domain used as a bait, no two‐hybrid interaction with Mip6p was seen. Conversely, when pAS2–MEX67 (II) was tested as a bait and pACTII–NUP2 as a prey, no blue colonies formed (Figure 9A, left panel). Mip6p is an uncharacterized ORF in yeast which belongs to the superfamily of RNA‐binding proteins (Figure 9B; see also Discussion). The MIP6 two‐hybrid clone is fused to the GAL4 activating domain at amino acid F(273) which is between the second and third RNP domain (Figure 9B). However, the Mip6p carboxy‐terminal domain alone, lacking all RNP domains, can still interact with Mex67p, as seen by the strong two‐hybrid interaction between pACTII–Mip6p (385) and pAS2–MEX67 (II) (Figure 9A, right panel). To rule out that an artificial peptide sequence generated at the junction site between the Gal4p DNA‐binding domain and Mex67p was the cause for the two‐hybrid interaction with Mip6p, two other Mex67p bait constructs were tested: whereas a bait construct containing the entire P/Q/G region plus the carboxy‐terminal domain fused to the Gal4p DNA‐binding domain [called pAS2–MEX67 (I)] was positive in the two‐hybrid assay, another bait construct [pAS2–MEX67 (III)] starting exactly at the NES‐like sequence of Mex67p (Figure 9A, right panel) or the P/Q/G domain alone (data not shown) did not exhibit a two‐hybrid interaction with Mip6p. Thus, an intact Mex67p carboxy‐terminal domain which includes part of the P/Q/G domain is required for the two‐hybrid interaction with Mip6p.

Figure 9.

Two‐hybrid interaction between Mex67p and a putative RNA‐binding protein. (A) Growth and blue colour development on X‐Gal plates. Left panel: Re‐isolated pACTII–MIP6 (273) plasmid (prey; derived from the two‐hybrid screen) was co‐transformed with pAS2–MEX67 (II) construct (bait; corresponding to residues 528–599 of Mex67p) into strain Y190 (gal4, gal80, trp1, leu2, his3, UASGAL–LacZ). For control reasons, other bait/prey combinations were also tested, including pAS2–MEX67 (II)/pACTII–NUP2 and pAS2–LOS1/pACTII–MIP6 (273). In each case, four transformants growing on SDC (−leu −trp) were streaked on SDC (−leu −trp −his; + 15 mM 3‐AT; + X‐Gal) plates. Right panel: combination of different Mex67p bait and Mip6p prey constructs. (B) MIP6 encodes a putative RNA‐binding protein in yeast (accession No. YHR015W, 659 amino acids). The three RNP motifs are underlined. The MIP6 two‐hybrid clone initially isolated from the screen was fused to the GAL4 activating domain at position F (273). A second construct was made and tested in the two‐hybrid assay in which only the C‐domain of Mip6p starting at G (385) and lacking the RNP domains was fused to the Gal4p activating domain.


How cellular RNA is exported from the nucleus into the cytoplasm is still poorly understood. We report here the identification of a novel cellular factor for nuclear export of polyadenylated RNA. Mex67p was found genetically through a synthetic lethal screen using mutated nup85Δ. We showed recently that Nup85p, which is a member of the Nup84p complex, is not only involved in NPC biogenesis, but is also linked to the mRNA export machinery (Siniossoglou et al., 1996). A conditional allele of RAT9 which is allelic to NUP85 also causes a strong and fast inhibition of mRNA export (Goldstein et al., 1996). Therefore, the synergistic enhancement of defects in mRNA export, induced by mutations in both mex67 and nup85 could have caused synthetic lethality in the sl102 mutant. Conversely, Mex67p is not genetically interacting with Seh1p, another member of the Nup85p complex which does not participate in RNA transport (Siniossoglou et al., 1996). Thus, Mex67p is genetically linked to the Nup85p complex as far as its mRNA export function is concerned. Accordingly, mex67 mutant cells do not reveal structurally distorted NPCs. The genes of two other synthetic lethal mutants derived from the screen with the nup85Δ allele have been recently cloned and shown to encode Nup188p and Nup170p (H.Tekotte and H.Santos‐Rosa, unpublished data). Although both proteins were implicated to be involved in the organization of the structural core of the NPC (Aitchison et al., 1995a; Nehrbass et al., 1996; Zabel et al., 1996), recent evidence suggested that Nup170p/Nle3p (Kenna et al., 1996) and Nup188p (Anne de Bruyn Kops, personal communication) are also involved in mRNA export.

Evidence for a direct participation of Mex67p in nuclear mRNA export is: (i) the fast and efficient onset of an mRNA export defect in the ts mex67‐5 mutant after shift to the restrictive temperature, with no apparent impairment in NLS‐mediated nuclear protein import; and (ii) the physical interaction of Mex67p with the transport substrate which is polyadenylated RNA. The phenotype of nucleolar disintegration and partial inhibition of certain pre‐rRNA processing steps in the mex67‐5 mutant may be secondary, which could be due to a nucleolar depletion of newly synthesized ribosomal proteins or nucleolar components, as a cause of a general inhibition of mRNA export. It is known that a normal nucleolar structure requires ongoing ribosomal biogenesis (Oakes et al., 1993) and nucleolar organization and rRNA processing are very sensitive to pleiotropic perturbations of diverse cellular functions. However, we cannot exclude that Mex67p is also involved in other export reactions including rRNA and snRNA transport.

In the electron microscope, several electron‐dense aggregates scattered throughout the nucleoplasm can be seen in mex67‐5 cells. Whether these are clustered RNP particles and correspond to the poly(A)+ containing spots previously seen by in situ hybridization, is not clear. It will be interesting to determine whether in wild‐type cells these foci represent the actual sites at which nuclear hnRNP export originates. The observation that, in ts mex67 cells, polyadenylated RNA does not accumulate at the NPCs, suggests that a transport step somewhere between the site of RNA transcription and the nuclear envelope is inhibited. Whether Mex67p is also required for intranuclear transport requires further clarification.

It is also not clear whether Mex67p shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, in order to fulfil its transport function, or if it performs its essential role exclusively at the nuclear pore complex. Wild‐type Mex67p cannot be distinguished from a bona fide nucleoporin; however, mutant forms of Mex67p regain different subcellular locations and can be found both in the cytoplasm and nucleus; under these conditions of mislocalization, other tested nucleoporins such as Nsp1p and Nup85p remained bound to the NPCs. The association of Mex67p with the nuclear pores therefore could be transient and dynamic, and Mex67p may partition into the nucleus and cytoplasm. Similarly, Nup159p which is also involved in mRNA export in yeast has been reported to dissociate from NPCs when mutated (Gorsch et al., 1995). We found a fraction of Mex67p physically bound to the purified Nup85p complex. However, this is only a minor pool, suggesting that this interaction could be transient. Finally, Mex67p–GFP still localizes to the NPCs in the nup85Δ mutant, showing that the N‐domain of Nup85p is not involved in the targeting of Mex67p to the NPCs (A.Segref, unpublished results).

Recently, an RNA‐export factor in yeast named Gle1p which contains a NES‐like sequence active in heterologous systems has been identified and shown to interact with Rip1p and Nup100p (Murphy and Wente, 1996). Mex67p also contains a short peptide which not only resembles the NES of HIV Rev (Gerace, 1995; see also Figure 6A), but also acts as a NES in the Xenopus oocyte system. However, excess of Mex67p NES‐like peptides microinjected into Xenopus oocyte nuclei did not inhibit the cellular mRNA export pathway, whereas U1ΔSm RNA export and the RRE‐dependent RNA export was impaired. Therefore, the NES‐resembling sequence in its native context within the folded Mex67p protein may perform another or an additional role in yeast. It should be mentioned in this context that proteins in C.elegans and human which are homologous to Mex67p have corresponding peptides which do not conform to the NES consensus (Figure 1B). Thus, the NES‐resemblance and NES‐function in the Xenopus system may be fortuitous in the case of the Mex67p sequence. Nevertheless, this short essential sequence plays a crucial role for Mex67p function since it is required for both mRNA export and association with nuclear pores.

Mex67p is not only a nuclear pore‐associated protein, but has also physical contact to polyadenylated RNA in the living cell. One possibility is that Mex67p binds directly to RNA. However, Mex67p does not exhibit motifs indicative of an RNA‐binding protein. It is also conceivable that Mex67p associates with RNA via (a) bona fide RNA‐binding protein(s). HnRNP proteins, which shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, were implicated to be mediators of mRNA export (Piñol‐Roma and Dreyfuss, 1992; Michael et al., 1995; Lee et al., 1996). Several hnRNP proteins were identified in yeast, including Nab1p/Npl3p/Nop3p, Nab2p and Nab3p (Wilson et al., 1994; Russell and Tollervey, 1995; Lee et al., 1996). When affinity‐purified Mex67p–ProtA was analysed on Western blots, only trace amounts of Nab1p/Npl3 were present, and no Nab2p and Nab3p could be detected (data not shown). However, we can not exclude that Mex67p binds to these or other as yet unidentified hnRNP proteins, but this interaction is transient or not stable during biochemical purification. In an attempt to identify such proteins, a two‐hybrid screen was performed. In this screen, Mip6p (Mex67‐interacting protein) was found which is a putative RNA‐binding protein with three RNP consensus motifs in its central part (see also Figure 9B). Mip6p is highly homologous to another yeast RNA‐binding protein called Pes4p, which was found as a suppressor of DNA‐polymerase ε subunit (accession No. P39684).

Although we cannot exclude a three‐hybrid interaction between Mex67p and Mip6p involving a bridging RNA molecule, we find this less likely, because Mip6 lacking the putative RNA binding domains (i.e. the carboxy‐terminal part) still interacts with the Mex67p carboxy‐terminal domain in the two‐hybrid assay. We are currently investigating whether Mip6p represents a novel hnRNP or polyadenylate RNA binding protein in yeast which, together with Mex67p, is involved in nuclear mRNA export mechanisms.

The mex67‐5 protein mislocalizes to the cytoplasm under restrictive growth conditions, suggesting that its association with nuclear pores is inhibited. Interestingly, we found the CDC5 kinase gene as a high copy number suppressor of the mex67‐5 mutation (A.Segref and E.C.Hurt, unpublished results). It is therefore possible that the function of Mex67p is regulated by phosphorylation. Cdc5p may not be the genuine kinase involved in the regulation of Mex67p, since Cdc5p is a mitotic kinase which acts at the G2/M boundary and was frequently found in high‐copy suppressor screens (Kitada et al., 1993). However, it is possible that overproduced Cdc5p kinase can phosphorylate mutated mex67‐5p, thereby curing the thermosensitive growth phenotype. It will be interesting to find out whether phosphorylation/dephosphorylation is a mechanism to control the Mex67p function and/or location.

In summary, we have identified Mex67p as a novel component of the RNA transport machinery in yeast. This export factor for polyadenylated RNA, which has related proteins with similar domain organization in human and C.elegans, is associated with the nuclear pores and interacts physically with polyadenylated RNA. However, the location of Mex67p at the NPCs may be dynamic. Accordingly, Mex67p is likely to directly participate in the export of mRNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm.

Materials and methods

Yeast strains, DNA recombinant work and microbiological techniques

All strains used in this work are shown in Table I. Microbiological techniques, plasmid transformation, plasmid recovery, gene disruption, mating, sporulation of diploids and tetrad analysis were done essentially as described by Siniossoglou et al. (1996). Manipulation and analysis of DNA such as restriction analysis, end‐filling, ligations, PCR amplifications and DNA sequencing were performed according to Maniatis et al. (1982). When constructs were generated by PCR, DNA which was derived from a PCR amplification was routinely sequenced.

View this table:
Table 1. Yeast strains


The following plasmids were used in this study: pUN100: ARS1/CEN4 plasmid with the LEU2 marker (Elledge and Davis, 1988); pRS314 and pRS316: ARS4/CEN6 plasmids with the TRP1 and URA3 marker, respectively (Sikorski and Hieter, 1989); YDp‐H: pUC9‐based plasmid with the HIS3 marker (Berben et al., 1991); pHT4467–URA3–ADE3: the ADE3 gene derived from pCH1122 (Kranz and Holm, 1990) was inserted into the SmaI–SpeI site of plasmid pRS316; pHT4467–URA3–ADE3–NUP85: the NUP85 gene was inserted as a XbaI–SacI fragment into the XbaI–SacI site of the polylinker of pHT4467.

Further plasmids, which are described in the text, were:

pUN100–LEU2–MEX67, pUN100–LEU2–mex67‐5,

pUN100–LEU2–MEX67–ProtA, pUN100–LEU2–mex67‐5–ProtA,

pUN100–LEU2–mex67‐5–GFP, pUN100–LEU2–MEX67–GFP

pRS316–URA3–MEX67, pHT4467–URA3–mex67‐5

pRS316–URA3–mex67Δnes, pRS314–TRP1–MEX67,

pRS314–TRP1–mex67Δnes, pRS314–TRP1–mex67‐5,

pRS314–TRP1–mex67–nes1, pRS314–TRP1–mex67–nes2,

pRS314–TRP1–mex67–nes3, pRS314–TRP1–mex67–nes1–GFP,

pRS314–TRP1–mex67–nes3–GFP, pBluescript–HIS3::mex67,

pet8c–(HIS)6–MEX67, pRS316–URA3–Matα2–lacZ.

Isolation of synthetic lethal mutants starting with the nup85Δ allele and cloning of MEX67

A screening strain was constructed for the red/white colony sectoring assay (Wimmer et al., 1992) which contained the plasmid pHT4467–URA3–ADE3–NUP85 in a HIS3::nup85Δ/ade2/ade3 genetic background. This screening strain RW nup85Δ was generated by mating strains nup85Δ with CH1462 (Kranz and Holm, 1990) followed by tetrad analysis (Table I). UV‐mutagenesis was carried out as described earlier (Wimmer et al., 1992; Grandi et al., 1995). Approximately 15 000 surviving colonies were analysed for a red, non‐sectoring phenotype at 30°C. 13 colonies finally fulfilled the requirement to be synthetically lethal with nup85Δ, but not with wild‐type NUP85. Of the 13 sl mutants, sl102 (Table I) was transformed with a yeast genomic library inserted into pUN100–LEU2 as described earlier (Grandi et al., 1995), and the complementing plasmid was recovered from transformants which regained both a red/white colony sectoring phenotype and growth on 5‐FOA. The ORF of the MEX67 gene was completely disrupted by inserting the HIS3 gene (obtained as BamHI fragment from plasmid YDp‐H) between the ATG start codon and the stop codon. This insertion was possible, because BamHI restriction sites were previously generated by PCR‐mediated mutagenesis both at the start and stop codon. The linearized mex67::HIS3 construct was used to transform the diploid yeast strain RS453. Heterozygous mex67::HIS3 transformants with the integrated null allele were sporulated and tetrad analysis was done. No haploid progeny were growing which contained the mex67::HIS3 null allele. The non‐growing progeny normally germinated, but died in a 1–2 cell stage. However, haploid mex67::HIS3 cells formed colonies when they carried the URA3‐containing plasmid with the MEX67 gene. Finally, strain mex67::HIS3 complemented by pURA3–MEX67 died on 5‐FOA‐containing plates, proving that MEX67 is essential for vegetative growth.

Generation of thermosensitive mex67 mutants

Mutagenesis of double‐stranded plasmid DNA containing the MEX67 gene (pUN100–MEX67) was done with hydroxylamine essentially after Amberg et al. (1993). Mutagenized plasmid DNA was directly transformed into the MEX67 shuffle strain. A total of 3300 transformants were picked and plated at 23°C (permissive temperature) on 5‐FOA‐containing SDC plates. After 4 days, growing colonies (lacking pURA3–MEX67 and being complemented by a mutagenized pUN100–LEU2–mex67) were replica‐plated on glucose‐containing YPD plates both at 23°C and 37°C. From this screen, in total three ts mutants (ts mex67‐1, mex67‐4 and mex67‐5) were obtained. Recovery of plasmid DNA from the cells was achieved by isolating total DNA and re‐transformation of competent Escherichia coli MC1061 cells. The DNA corresponding to ts mex67 allele was entirely sequenced. All three plasmids pUN100–mex67‐1, pUN100–mex67‐4 and pUN100–mex67‐5 were retransformed in the MEX67 shuffle strain and after FOA‐selection, the phenotype of recovered mex67 ts alleles could be reproduced.

Construction of MEX67 fusion genes

The ProtA tag was derived from Staphylococcus aureus protein A and consisted of two IgG binding domains (Grandi et al., 1993, 1995). For the ProtA tagging of MEX67, a new BamHI site was generated at the 3′ end of MEX67 gene, six nucleotides before the stop codon. The DNA sequence around the stop codon is TTT GTG CAG TTC GGA TCC TAA TGA TAT TGT. A BamHI fragment encoding the ProtA tag (Siniossoglou et al., 1996) was inserted in frame and in the correct orientation at this newly generated BamHI site of MEX67. The fusion gene MEX67–ProtA was inserted into the pUN100–LEU2 vector. To tag MEX67 with the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), a BamHI DNA fragment was amplified by PCR which encodes the GFP tag and inserted in frame into the BamHI site previously generated at the stop codon of MEX67 (see also above). In a similar way, also the ts mex67‐5 allele was tagged with the GFP. The GFP used is a S65T/V163A variant exhibiting enhanced fluorescence properties (Kahana and Silver, 1996; Shibasaki et al., 1996).

Analysis of synthetic lethality between mex67 and other mutant alleles

To test for synthetic lethality with nup85 mutant alleles, sl 102 was transformed with pRS314–TRP1–mex67‐5 and transformants were streaked on 5‐FOA plates. To test for synthetic lethality with NUP84, a strain carrying the nup84::HIS3 null disruption was mated to MEX67 shuffle strain transformed with pRS314–TRP1–mex67‐5. After sporulation and tetrad analysis, complete tetrads revealing a 2:2 HIS+/his segregation and carrying both pRS316–URA3–MEX67 and pRS314–TRP1–mex67‐5 were plated on 5‐FOA‐containing plates. In a similar way, matings and tetrad analysis between the MEX67 shuffle strain with strains seh1::HIS3 (Siniossoglou et al., 1996) and pom152 (Wozniak et al., 1994) were performed to determine possible synthetic lethal interactions (data not shown).

In vivo analysis of the location Mex67–GFP

The in vivo fluorescence analysis of cells expressing GFP‐fusion proteins was done as recently described (Belgareh and Doye, 1997). Strains expressing GFP‐fusion proteins were also transformed with an ADE2‐containing pASZ11–ADE2 plasmid (obtained from B.Séraphin, EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany) to revert the red colour phenotype of ade2 strains which gives a strong vacuolar autofluorescence in the fluorescence microscope. Transformed cells growing in selective medium at the indicated temperatures were then examined for the GFP fluorescence signal in the fluorescein channel of a True Confocal Scanner LEICA TCS 4D confocal fluorescence microscope.

Mutational analysis of the NES‐resembling motif within the Mex67p carboxy‐terminal domain

The mutations within the sequence of Mex67p resembling the Rev NES were made by PCR‐mediated site‐specific mutagenesis. All PCR‐derived DNA sequences were sequenced to confirm the generation of the desired mutation and to exclude additional PCR errors. To tag the mutated Mex67p forms with GFP, a BamHI DNA fragment was amplified by PCR which encodes the GFP tag and inserted in frame into a BamHI site previously generated at the stop codon of MEX67 (see also above). The various fusion genes tagged with GFP were inserted into the pRS314–TRP1 vector and together with the pASZ11–ADE2 plasmid transformed into the MEX67 shuffle strain. Transformants were then selected on 5‐FOA plates before the in vivo location of the GFP‐fusion proteins was determined by fluorescence microscopy (see also above).

Generation of anti‐Mex67p antibodies

The MEX67 ORF was PCR‐amplified using two primers that generated a SalI site at the ATG start codon and a MluI site in the 3′‐untranslated region of the gene. This ORF was then cloned into a pET–HIS6 vector as described earlier (Simos et al., 1996). The recombinant Mex67p protein produced in E.coli was excised from SDS–polyacrylamide gels and injected into rabbits. From the immune serum, antibodies were affinity‐purified on nitrocellulose strips containing the recombinant Mex67p antigen.

UV crosslinking of Mex67p to polyadenylated RNA

Isolation of UV‐crosslinked polyadenylated RNA–RNP complexes from BJ926 yeast cells and analysis of crosslinked proteins including Mex67p, Nab1p/Npl3p, Nop1p, Nup85p and Nup57p by SDS–PAGE and Western blotting were done essentially as described (Anderson et al., 1993; Russell and Tollervey, 1995). 500 ml of BJ926 cells grown to OD600 of 1.0 were harvested by centrifugation and treated further as described in Anderson et al. (1993). In a first step, the oligo(dT)‐cellulose column which was loaded with either UV‐crosslinked or non‐crosslinked yeast cell lysate, was repeatedly washed with binding buffer before elution with 0.05% SDS‐buffer. This first eluate was heated up to 65°C for 10 min, before it was diluted to 40 ml with binding buffer. The eluted poly(A)+ RNA was reloaded on a second oligo(dT)‐cellulose column and a second flow‐through was collected. It was finally eluted with elution buffer and the RNA in the eluate was concentrated by butanol precipitation. After RNase T1/T2 treatment, aliquots of the first and second flow‐through and the final eluate were analysed by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting.

Two‐hybrid screen

A DNA fragment encoding part of the P/Q/G‐domain (starting at an internal NcoI site) plus the entire carboxy‐terminal domain of Mex67p [residues 528–599; called pAS2‐MEX67 (II)] was fused in frame to the GAL4‐DNA binding domain present in the pAS2–TRP1 bait vector (Durfee et al., 1993). As prey, a yeast genomic library fused to the GAL4 activating domain and inserted into pACTII–LEU2 (called FRYL library; Fromont‐Racine et al., 1997) was used in the two‐hybrid screen. It was screened in the yeast strain Y190 for colonies which can grow on SDC (−leu −trp −his) plates containing 15 mM 3‐AT and exhibit a LacZ+ phenotype (X‐Gal assay) according to Durfee et al. (1993). Of the 1.5×106 transformants, two clones finally fulfilled the requirements to specifically interact with Mex67p in the two‐hybrid screen. One of these two clones, called MIP6, was further analysed and shown to encode a putative RNA‐binding protein (accession No. YHR015W, 659 amino acids). The re‐isolated pACTII–MIP6 (273) plasmid (prey; derived from the two‐hybrid screen) was co‐transformed with pAS2–MEX67 (II) bait plasmid into strain Y190 (gal4, gal80, trp1, leu2, his3, UASGAL−LacZ). For control reasons, other bait/prey combinations were also tested, including pAS2–MEX67 (II)/pACTII–NUP2 and pAS2–LOS1/pACTII–MIP6 (273) (K.Hellmuth, unpublished data). In each case, four transformants growing on SDC (−leu −trp) were streaked on SDC (−leu −trp −his; + 15 mM 3‐AT; + X–Gal) plates. For control, further MEX67 constructs in pAS2 were made: (I) amino acids 483–599; (III), amino acids 549–599. Finally, a shortened MIP6 construct ranging from residues 385–659 was inserted into pACTII [called pACTII‐MIP6 (385)].


Analysis of poly(A)+ RNA export by in situ hybridization using fluorescently labelled oligo (dT) probes (Fabre et al., 1994) and of nuclear protein import using the Matα2–lacZ and GAL::L25 NLS–ProtA–DHFR nuclear reporter constructs was done as recently described (Nehrbass et al., 1993). Another assay for nuclear protein import was performed with the ts mex67‐5 mutant according to Shulga et al. (1996) which allows in vivo measurement of the rate of nuclear import of a GFP reporter fused to the SV40 NLS. Purification of Mex67–ProtA fusion proteins under non‐denaturing conditions and SDS–PAGE and Western blot analysis were performed essentially after Siniossoglou et al. (1996). To detect hnRNP proteins in eluates of the purified Mex67p–ProtA fusion protein by Western blotting, anti‐Nab1p/Npl3 antibodies (a rabbit polyclonal immune serum), monoclonal anti‐Nab2p and anti‐Nab3p antibodies were used in 1:1000, 1:400 and 1:400 dilutions, respectively. To detect ProtA‐fusion proteins and nucleoporins, goat anti‐rabbit IgG and mAB414 were used as first antibody (Siniossoglou et al., 1996). Electron microscopy of fixed and thin‐sectioned yeast cells was achieved according to Doye et al. (1994). The examination of rRNA processing defects in ts mex67 cells was done by Northern analysis (Tollervey et al., 1993). The in vivo assay for loss of suppressor tRNA activity and the analysis of tRNA splicing was identical to that described in Simos et al. (1996). NES‐activity measurements in the Xenopus oocyte system were done as described earlier (Fischer et al., 1995) and the peptides used to test for NES activity in Xenopus oocytes were synthesized and HPLC‐purified (R.Frank, ZMBH, Heidelberg, Germany).


We thank Cherichen Tekotte (EMBL, Heidelberg) for excellent technical assistance in the initial phase of this project, Klaus Hellmuth for the Los1p and Nup2p bait and prey constructs, David Tollervey (EMBL, Heidelberg) for help and advice, David Goldfarb (Rochester, New York, USA) for providing the reagents of the NLS–GFP in vivo import assay, Rick Wozniak (University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada) for the pom152::HIS3 strain, Maurice Swanson and Anette Obermann (University of Florida, Gainesville, USA) for monoclonal anti‐Nab2p (3F2) and Nab3p (AFL2) antibodies, Christian Siebel and Chris Guthrie (UCSF, San Francisco, USA) for polyclonal anti‐Nab1p/Npl3p antibodies, Dr Pierre Legrain (Pasteur Institute, Paris) for the FRYL yeast genomic library and Dr Brigitte Lavoie (University of Geneva, Switzerland) for critical reading of the manuscript. E.C.H. is the recipient of grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB352) and the Eurofan/TAPIR network. K.S. is supported by a predoctoral fellowship from Boehringer Ingelheim Foundation for biomedical research.